Radiative forcing bias of simulated surface albedo modifications linked to forest cover changes at northern latitudes

In the presence of snow, the bias in the prediction of surface albedo by many climate models remains difficult to correct due to the difficulties of separating the albedo parameterizations from those describing snow and vegetation cover and structure. This can be overcome by extracting the albedo pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R. M. Bright, G. Myhre, R. Astrup, C. Antón-Fernández, A. H. Strømman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2015-04-01
Series:Biogeosciences
Online Access:http://www.biogeosciences.net/12/2195/2015/bg-12-2195-2015.pdf
_version_ 1811234877642637312
author R. M. Bright
G. Myhre
R. Astrup
C. Antón-Fernández
A. H. Strømman
author_facet R. M. Bright
G. Myhre
R. Astrup
C. Antón-Fernández
A. H. Strømman
author_sort R. M. Bright
collection DOAJ
description In the presence of snow, the bias in the prediction of surface albedo by many climate models remains difficult to correct due to the difficulties of separating the albedo parameterizations from those describing snow and vegetation cover and structure. This can be overcome by extracting the albedo parameterizations in isolation, by executing them with observed meteorology and information on vegetation structure, and by comparing the resulting predictions to observations. Here, we employ an empirical data set of forest structure and daily meteorology for three snow cover seasons and for three case regions in boreal Norway to compute and evaluate predicted albedo to those based on daily MODIS retrievals. Forest and adjacent open area albedos are subsequently used to estimate bias in top-of-the-atmosphere (TOA) radiative forcings (RF) from albedo changes (&Delta;&alpha;, Open–Forest) connected to land use and land cover changes (LULCC). <br><br> As expected, given the diversity of approaches by which snow masking by tall-statured vegetation is parameterized, the magnitude and sign of the albedo biases varied considerably for forests. Large biases at the open sites were also detected, which was unexpected given that these sites were snow-covered throughout most of the analytical time period, therefore eliminating potential biases linked to snow-masking parameterizations. Biases at the open sites were mostly positive, exacerbating the strength of vegetation masking effects and hence the simulated LULCC &Delta;&alpha; RF. Despite the large biases in both forest and open area albedos by some schemes in some months and years, the mean &Delta;&alpha; RF bias over the 3-year period (November–May) was considerably small across models (−2.1 ± 1.04 Wm<sup>−2</sup>; 21 ± 11%); four of six models had normalized mean absolute errors less than 20%. Identifying systematic sources of the albedo prediction biases proved challenging, although for some schemes clear sources were identified.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T11:43:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5700ae9441fe41af9bea65b44843ac93
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1726-4170
1726-4189
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T11:43:51Z
publishDate 2015-04-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Biogeosciences
spelling doaj.art-5700ae9441fe41af9bea65b44843ac932022-12-22T03:34:27ZengCopernicus PublicationsBiogeosciences1726-41701726-41892015-04-011272195220510.5194/bg-12-2195-2015Radiative forcing bias of simulated surface albedo modifications linked to forest cover changes at northern latitudesR. M. Bright0G. Myhre1R. Astrup2C. Antón-Fernández3A. H. Strømman4Industrial Ecology Program, Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Høgskoleringen 5, E-1, 7491 Trondheim, NorwayCenter for International Climate and Environmental Research – Oslo (CICERO), P.O. Box 1129, Blindern, 0318 Oslo, NorwayNorwegian Forest and Landscape Institute, P.O. Box 115, 1431 Ås, NorwayNorwegian Forest and Landscape Institute, P.O. Box 115, 1431 Ås, NorwayIndustrial Ecology Program, Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Høgskoleringen 5, E-1, 7491 Trondheim, NorwayIn the presence of snow, the bias in the prediction of surface albedo by many climate models remains difficult to correct due to the difficulties of separating the albedo parameterizations from those describing snow and vegetation cover and structure. This can be overcome by extracting the albedo parameterizations in isolation, by executing them with observed meteorology and information on vegetation structure, and by comparing the resulting predictions to observations. Here, we employ an empirical data set of forest structure and daily meteorology for three snow cover seasons and for three case regions in boreal Norway to compute and evaluate predicted albedo to those based on daily MODIS retrievals. Forest and adjacent open area albedos are subsequently used to estimate bias in top-of-the-atmosphere (TOA) radiative forcings (RF) from albedo changes (&Delta;&alpha;, Open–Forest) connected to land use and land cover changes (LULCC). <br><br> As expected, given the diversity of approaches by which snow masking by tall-statured vegetation is parameterized, the magnitude and sign of the albedo biases varied considerably for forests. Large biases at the open sites were also detected, which was unexpected given that these sites were snow-covered throughout most of the analytical time period, therefore eliminating potential biases linked to snow-masking parameterizations. Biases at the open sites were mostly positive, exacerbating the strength of vegetation masking effects and hence the simulated LULCC &Delta;&alpha; RF. Despite the large biases in both forest and open area albedos by some schemes in some months and years, the mean &Delta;&alpha; RF bias over the 3-year period (November–May) was considerably small across models (−2.1 ± 1.04 Wm<sup>−2</sup>; 21 ± 11%); four of six models had normalized mean absolute errors less than 20%. Identifying systematic sources of the albedo prediction biases proved challenging, although for some schemes clear sources were identified.http://www.biogeosciences.net/12/2195/2015/bg-12-2195-2015.pdf
spellingShingle R. M. Bright
G. Myhre
R. Astrup
C. Antón-Fernández
A. H. Strømman
Radiative forcing bias of simulated surface albedo modifications linked to forest cover changes at northern latitudes
Biogeosciences
title Radiative forcing bias of simulated surface albedo modifications linked to forest cover changes at northern latitudes
title_full Radiative forcing bias of simulated surface albedo modifications linked to forest cover changes at northern latitudes
title_fullStr Radiative forcing bias of simulated surface albedo modifications linked to forest cover changes at northern latitudes
title_full_unstemmed Radiative forcing bias of simulated surface albedo modifications linked to forest cover changes at northern latitudes
title_short Radiative forcing bias of simulated surface albedo modifications linked to forest cover changes at northern latitudes
title_sort radiative forcing bias of simulated surface albedo modifications linked to forest cover changes at northern latitudes
url http://www.biogeosciences.net/12/2195/2015/bg-12-2195-2015.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT rmbright radiativeforcingbiasofsimulatedsurfacealbedomodificationslinkedtoforestcoverchangesatnorthernlatitudes
AT gmyhre radiativeforcingbiasofsimulatedsurfacealbedomodificationslinkedtoforestcoverchangesatnorthernlatitudes
AT rastrup radiativeforcingbiasofsimulatedsurfacealbedomodificationslinkedtoforestcoverchangesatnorthernlatitudes
AT cantonfernandez radiativeforcingbiasofsimulatedsurfacealbedomodificationslinkedtoforestcoverchangesatnorthernlatitudes
AT ahstrømman radiativeforcingbiasofsimulatedsurfacealbedomodificationslinkedtoforestcoverchangesatnorthernlatitudes