Learning Curve for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing – the Experience of a Romanian Academic Center

Introduction: There is an increasing interest in the past decade for more physiological pacing strategies due to detrimental long-term right ventricular pacing. His bundle pacing is the most physiological one, but it has some drawbacks, mainly an increased pacing threshold. Left bundle branch area p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Catalin PESTREA, Alexandra GHERGHINA, Irina PINTILIE, Florin ORTAN
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2021-07-01
Series:Romanian Journal of Cardiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.romanianjournalcardiology.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/RRC_art-8-4.pdf
_version_ 1818179238887424000
author Catalin PESTREA
Alexandra GHERGHINA
Irina PINTILIE
Florin ORTAN
author_facet Catalin PESTREA
Alexandra GHERGHINA
Irina PINTILIE
Florin ORTAN
author_sort Catalin PESTREA
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: There is an increasing interest in the past decade for more physiological pacing strategies due to detrimental long-term right ventricular pacing. His bundle pacing is the most physiological one, but it has some drawbacks, mainly an increased pacing threshold. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) emerged in the recent years as the next step in conduction system pacing. We present our initial experience and learning curve with this latter procedure. Material and methods: During January 2019 and February 2021, 20 patients with pacing indications that failed initial permanent His bundle pacing underwent successful LBBAP. Results: The mean age was 65.9 ± 12.7 years. The indications for cardiac pacing were AV block in 14 patients(70%) and cardiac resynchronization therapy in 6 patients (30%). At baseline, normal QRS complex was noted in 9 patients, a left bundle branch block pattern in 10 patients and a right bundle branch block in one patient. A total of 18 dual-chamber and one single chamber pacemakers were implanted and a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) device. The acute pacing threshold was 0.56±0.2 V at 0.4ms, the sensing threshold was 10.3±3.9 mV and the impedance was 684.9±112.2 Ω. The overall QRS duration decreased after LBBAP from 128.5 ± 27ms to 103.6 ± 17.4ms (p= 0.001). In patients with baseline wide QRS complex there was a highly significant decrease from 148.2 ± 11.6 ms to 104.7 ± 19.4 ms (p<0.001). The fl uoroscopy time, including the time spent for His bundle location, was 13.8 ± 8.5 minutes. The pacing thresholds remained constant after three-months (0.6 ± 0.2 V vs. 0.56 ± 0.2 V at 0.4 ms). We had two intraprocedural septal perforations without any consequences and three micro dislodgements at follow-up with pure left septal capture. Conclusion: Left bundle branch area pacing is a feasible physiological pacing technique with a high success rate and the potential to overcome the limits of permanent His bundle pacing. It can be successfully performed virtually in all types of pacing indications, including cardiac resynchronization therapy as provides a rapid and synchronous activation of the left ventricle.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T21:00:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5704d717721a4c91b31369f0c6d4ea3b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1220-658X
2734-6382
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T21:00:42Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher Sciendo
record_format Article
series Romanian Journal of Cardiology
spelling doaj.art-5704d717721a4c91b31369f0c6d4ea3b2022-12-22T00:51:00ZengSciendoRomanian Journal of Cardiology1220-658X2734-63822021-07-01312327334https://doi.org/10.47803/rjc.2021.31.2.327Learning Curve for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing – the Experience of a Romanian Academic CenterCatalin PESTREA0Alexandra GHERGHINA1Irina PINTILIE2Florin ORTAN3Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, County Emergency Clinical Hospital, Brasov, RomaniaIntensive Cardiac Care Unit, County Emergency Clinical Hospital, Brasov, RomaniaInterventional Cardiology Unit, County Emergency Clinical Hospital, Brasov, RomaniaInterventional Cardiology Unit, County Emergency Clinical Hospital, Brasov, RomaniaIntroduction: There is an increasing interest in the past decade for more physiological pacing strategies due to detrimental long-term right ventricular pacing. His bundle pacing is the most physiological one, but it has some drawbacks, mainly an increased pacing threshold. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) emerged in the recent years as the next step in conduction system pacing. We present our initial experience and learning curve with this latter procedure. Material and methods: During January 2019 and February 2021, 20 patients with pacing indications that failed initial permanent His bundle pacing underwent successful LBBAP. Results: The mean age was 65.9 ± 12.7 years. The indications for cardiac pacing were AV block in 14 patients(70%) and cardiac resynchronization therapy in 6 patients (30%). At baseline, normal QRS complex was noted in 9 patients, a left bundle branch block pattern in 10 patients and a right bundle branch block in one patient. A total of 18 dual-chamber and one single chamber pacemakers were implanted and a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) device. The acute pacing threshold was 0.56±0.2 V at 0.4ms, the sensing threshold was 10.3±3.9 mV and the impedance was 684.9±112.2 Ω. The overall QRS duration decreased after LBBAP from 128.5 ± 27ms to 103.6 ± 17.4ms (p= 0.001). In patients with baseline wide QRS complex there was a highly significant decrease from 148.2 ± 11.6 ms to 104.7 ± 19.4 ms (p<0.001). The fl uoroscopy time, including the time spent for His bundle location, was 13.8 ± 8.5 minutes. The pacing thresholds remained constant after three-months (0.6 ± 0.2 V vs. 0.56 ± 0.2 V at 0.4 ms). We had two intraprocedural septal perforations without any consequences and three micro dislodgements at follow-up with pure left septal capture. Conclusion: Left bundle branch area pacing is a feasible physiological pacing technique with a high success rate and the potential to overcome the limits of permanent His bundle pacing. It can be successfully performed virtually in all types of pacing indications, including cardiac resynchronization therapy as provides a rapid and synchronous activation of the left ventricle.https://www.romanianjournalcardiology.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/RRC_art-8-4.pdfleft bundle branch areacardiac pacinglearning curve
spellingShingle Catalin PESTREA
Alexandra GHERGHINA
Irina PINTILIE
Florin ORTAN
Learning Curve for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing – the Experience of a Romanian Academic Center
Romanian Journal of Cardiology
left bundle branch area
cardiac pacing
learning curve
title Learning Curve for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing – the Experience of a Romanian Academic Center
title_full Learning Curve for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing – the Experience of a Romanian Academic Center
title_fullStr Learning Curve for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing – the Experience of a Romanian Academic Center
title_full_unstemmed Learning Curve for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing – the Experience of a Romanian Academic Center
title_short Learning Curve for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing – the Experience of a Romanian Academic Center
title_sort learning curve for left bundle branch area pacing the experience of a romanian academic center
topic left bundle branch area
cardiac pacing
learning curve
url https://www.romanianjournalcardiology.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/RRC_art-8-4.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT catalinpestrea learningcurveforleftbundlebranchareapacingtheexperienceofaromanianacademiccenter
AT alexandragherghina learningcurveforleftbundlebranchareapacingtheexperienceofaromanianacademiccenter
AT irinapintilie learningcurveforleftbundlebranchareapacingtheexperienceofaromanianacademiccenter
AT florinortan learningcurveforleftbundlebranchareapacingtheexperienceofaromanianacademiccenter