The Bondei object pronoun in clefts and pseudo-clefts.pdf

Verbs in Bondei, a Bantu language spoken in East Africa, have crossreferencing pronouns which agree in noun class with the subject and object of the clause. This paper will examine the distribution of the syntactic category object pronoun in four grammatical constructions: (a) basic affirmative decl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Elizabeth G. Weber
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: LibraryPress@UF 1988-08-01
Series:Studies in African Linguistics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.flvc.org/sal/article/view/107464
_version_ 1818402493709680640
author Elizabeth G. Weber
author_facet Elizabeth G. Weber
author_sort Elizabeth G. Weber
collection DOAJ
description Verbs in Bondei, a Bantu language spoken in East Africa, have crossreferencing pronouns which agree in noun class with the subject and object of the clause. This paper will examine the distribution of the syntactic category object pronoun in four grammatical constructions: (a) basic affirmative declarative clauses; (b) relative clauses; (c) clefts; and (d) pseudo-clefts. In declarative and relative clauses, the presence of the object pronoun does not require a definite interpretation of the object noun; the absence of the object pronoun does not preclude a definite interpretation of the object noun. In both cleft and pseudo-cleft constructions, however, the object pronoun obligatorily functions to grammatically mark clef ted and pseudo-clef ted objects as definite. In the cleft constructions, the definiteness of the clef ted NP forces a contrastive interpretation. Thus, a judgement concerning the function of this grammatical construction with regard to contrastive function will be made on the basis of the distribution of the syntactic category object pronoun. possible to make the same judgment. Contrastive function is unambiguously signaled by the relative morphology on the verb of the pseudo-cleft. In this constuction, the object pronoun serves only to force a definite interpretation of the NP. In the pseudo-cleft constructions, it is not possible to make the same judgment. Contrastive function is unambiguously signaled by the relative morphology on the verb of the pseudo-cleft. In this constuction, the object pronoun serves only to force a definite interpretation of the NP.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T08:09:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-570e0c31bd874852948575a3d1b95d36
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0039-3533
2154-428X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T08:09:15Z
publishDate 1988-08-01
publisher LibraryPress@UF
record_format Article
series Studies in African Linguistics
spelling doaj.art-570e0c31bd874852948575a3d1b95d362022-12-21T23:10:06ZengLibraryPress@UFStudies in African Linguistics0039-35332154-428X1988-08-0119210.32473/sal.v19i2.107464The Bondei object pronoun in clefts and pseudo-clefts.pdfElizabeth G. WeberVerbs in Bondei, a Bantu language spoken in East Africa, have crossreferencing pronouns which agree in noun class with the subject and object of the clause. This paper will examine the distribution of the syntactic category object pronoun in four grammatical constructions: (a) basic affirmative declarative clauses; (b) relative clauses; (c) clefts; and (d) pseudo-clefts. In declarative and relative clauses, the presence of the object pronoun does not require a definite interpretation of the object noun; the absence of the object pronoun does not preclude a definite interpretation of the object noun. In both cleft and pseudo-cleft constructions, however, the object pronoun obligatorily functions to grammatically mark clef ted and pseudo-clef ted objects as definite. In the cleft constructions, the definiteness of the clef ted NP forces a contrastive interpretation. Thus, a judgement concerning the function of this grammatical construction with regard to contrastive function will be made on the basis of the distribution of the syntactic category object pronoun. possible to make the same judgment. Contrastive function is unambiguously signaled by the relative morphology on the verb of the pseudo-cleft. In this constuction, the object pronoun serves only to force a definite interpretation of the NP. In the pseudo-cleft constructions, it is not possible to make the same judgment. Contrastive function is unambiguously signaled by the relative morphology on the verb of the pseudo-cleft. In this constuction, the object pronoun serves only to force a definite interpretation of the NP.https://journals.flvc.org/sal/article/view/107464BondeiBantupronounsnoun classrelative clausescleft
spellingShingle Elizabeth G. Weber
The Bondei object pronoun in clefts and pseudo-clefts.pdf
Studies in African Linguistics
Bondei
Bantu
pronouns
noun class
relative clauses
cleft
title The Bondei object pronoun in clefts and pseudo-clefts.pdf
title_full The Bondei object pronoun in clefts and pseudo-clefts.pdf
title_fullStr The Bondei object pronoun in clefts and pseudo-clefts.pdf
title_full_unstemmed The Bondei object pronoun in clefts and pseudo-clefts.pdf
title_short The Bondei object pronoun in clefts and pseudo-clefts.pdf
title_sort bondei object pronoun in clefts and pseudo clefts pdf
topic Bondei
Bantu
pronouns
noun class
relative clauses
cleft
url https://journals.flvc.org/sal/article/view/107464
work_keys_str_mv AT elizabethgweber thebondeiobjectpronounincleftsandpseudocleftspdf
AT elizabethgweber bondeiobjectpronounincleftsandpseudocleftspdf