EntreviSta com Manuel Carreiras (BCBL)
<p>At least since the eighties, proponents of two classes of models have been lively debating in Psycholinguistics, with interesting claims in the field of anaphoric resolution. On the one hand, structural models assume an early role for grammatical information in coreference resolution and, o...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Published: |
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
2015-05-01
|
| Series: | Revista Linguística |
| Online Access: | https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rl/article/view/4546 |
| _version_ | 1811328263307395072 |
|---|---|
| author | Marcus Maia |
| author_facet | Marcus Maia |
| author_sort | Marcus Maia |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>At least since the eighties, proponents of two classes of models have been lively debating in Psycholinguistics, with interesting claims in the field of anaphoric resolution. On the one hand, structural models assume an early role for grammatical information in coreference resolution and, on the other hand, interactive models predict early and simultaneous use of both grammatical and context-based information. How do you currently evaluate this debate? How does the debate stand in the light of the sophisticated methodologies now available?</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T15:22:11Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-57105dc539ff4e12931bacbe3bf5e79b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1808-835X 2238-975X |
| language | Portuguese |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T15:22:11Z |
| publishDate | 2015-05-01 |
| publisher | Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Revista Linguística |
| spelling | doaj.art-57105dc539ff4e12931bacbe3bf5e79b2022-12-22T02:41:36ZporUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroRevista Linguística1808-835X2238-975X2015-05-01823145EntreviSta com Manuel Carreiras (BCBL)Marcus Maia0UFRJ<p>At least since the eighties, proponents of two classes of models have been lively debating in Psycholinguistics, with interesting claims in the field of anaphoric resolution. On the one hand, structural models assume an early role for grammatical information in coreference resolution and, on the other hand, interactive models predict early and simultaneous use of both grammatical and context-based information. How do you currently evaluate this debate? How does the debate stand in the light of the sophisticated methodologies now available?</p>https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rl/article/view/4546 |
| spellingShingle | Marcus Maia EntreviSta com Manuel Carreiras (BCBL) Revista Linguística |
| title | EntreviSta com Manuel Carreiras (BCBL) |
| title_full | EntreviSta com Manuel Carreiras (BCBL) |
| title_fullStr | EntreviSta com Manuel Carreiras (BCBL) |
| title_full_unstemmed | EntreviSta com Manuel Carreiras (BCBL) |
| title_short | EntreviSta com Manuel Carreiras (BCBL) |
| title_sort | entrevista com manuel carreiras bcbl |
| url | https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rl/article/view/4546 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT marcusmaia entrevistacommanuelcarreirasbcbl |