IMPROVING PERSONNEL RELIABILITY CHECKS THROUGH THE HARMONIZATION OF NATIONAL AND EU LEGISLATION

Since 1 January 2022, the new Law on the Prevention of Corruption of the Republic of Lithuania (hereinafter – the Law on the Prevention of Corruption) entered into force, which obliged the public sector to be even more responsible for ensuring transparent activities and applying anti-corruption meas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Žaneta Navickienė, Artūras Kinkevičius
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mykolas Romeris University 2023-06-01
Series:Jurisprudencija
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.mruni.eu/ojs/jurisprudence/article/view/7688
_version_ 1797777266253496320
author Žaneta Navickienė
Artūras Kinkevičius
author_facet Žaneta Navickienė
Artūras Kinkevičius
author_sort Žaneta Navickienė
collection DOAJ
description Since 1 January 2022, the new Law on the Prevention of Corruption of the Republic of Lithuania (hereinafter – the Law on the Prevention of Corruption) entered into force, which obliged the public sector to be even more responsible for ensuring transparent activities and applying anti-corruption measures. In addition, ensuring national security is an integral part of the implementation of the provisions of the mentioned law. However, it is obvious that there is a lack of a unified approach to the need to review and harmonize the provisions of both laws: the Law on the Prevention of Corruption and the Law on the Protection of Important Objects for Ensuring National Security of the Republic of Lithuania (hereinafter – the Law on the Protection of Important Objects for Ensuring National Security), which are united by certain concepts and procedures. The purpose of the study is to evaluate legal regulation of the features of the personnel reliability check in the implementation of the Law on the Prevention of Corruption and The Law on the Protection of Important Objects for Ensuring National Security. In realizing the research goal, three main tasks were set: 1. To define and harmonize the concept of ensuring the reliability of personnel when comparing the provisions governing the reliability of the personnel of the laws mentioned above. 2. To evaluate the deadlines for submitting information about the inspected person established by provisions of mentioned laws. 3. To assess whether the personal data protection provisions applied in the personnel reliability verification procedures regulating the mentioned laws comply with the GDPR. When evaluating the provisions of both legal acts, the personnel reliability check was analysed in two main dimensions: firstly, the harmonization of concepts established in different legal acts; secondly, the terms during which information about the verified candidate is provided. During the research, it was identified that the provisions of the laws are not harmonized in themselves: different concepts are used to define the personnel reliability check (personnel due diligence), and the terms of the reliability check are not balanced. Furthermore, the provisions of the Law on the Protection of Important Objects for Ensuring National Security must be amended by refusing to collect consent from individuals, stating that the person must be informed about their verification, which is carried out in accordance with the legal obligation applicable to the Data Controller, which should be provided for in the law mentioned above. Therefore, proposals for improving the provisions of the law are presented. After conducting a comparative assessment of the content of the personnel reliability check, the synchronization of relevant concepts provided for in the aforementioned laws is proposed. Secondly, when evaluating the different deadlines for submitting information about the verified candidate, it is suggested to balance them in order to make it possible to make the final decision on the candidate’s employment more efficiently. Thirdly, when comparing the targeted provisions of the above-mentioned laws regulating the protection of personal data, the established justification of the different regulations is missing. Therefore, suggestions are made on how to harmonize the provisions for ensuring the protection of personal data in the laws mentioned above, so that they meet the requirements of the GDPR – the candidate’s consent to verification should not be taken, but the obligation to perform such a verification must be established, thus ensuring the supremacy of the universal good.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T23:01:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-57119505435d476eb5fc33f7b4311461
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1392-6195
2029-2058
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T23:01:41Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Mykolas Romeris University
record_format Article
series Jurisprudencija
spelling doaj.art-57119505435d476eb5fc33f7b43114612023-07-19T10:40:00ZengMykolas Romeris UniversityJurisprudencija1392-61952029-20582023-06-0130110.13165/JUR-23-30-1-05 IMPROVING PERSONNEL RELIABILITY CHECKS THROUGH THE HARMONIZATION OF NATIONAL AND EU LEGISLATIONŽaneta NavickienėArtūras KinkevičiusSince 1 January 2022, the new Law on the Prevention of Corruption of the Republic of Lithuania (hereinafter – the Law on the Prevention of Corruption) entered into force, which obliged the public sector to be even more responsible for ensuring transparent activities and applying anti-corruption measures. In addition, ensuring national security is an integral part of the implementation of the provisions of the mentioned law. However, it is obvious that there is a lack of a unified approach to the need to review and harmonize the provisions of both laws: the Law on the Prevention of Corruption and the Law on the Protection of Important Objects for Ensuring National Security of the Republic of Lithuania (hereinafter – the Law on the Protection of Important Objects for Ensuring National Security), which are united by certain concepts and procedures. The purpose of the study is to evaluate legal regulation of the features of the personnel reliability check in the implementation of the Law on the Prevention of Corruption and The Law on the Protection of Important Objects for Ensuring National Security. In realizing the research goal, three main tasks were set: 1. To define and harmonize the concept of ensuring the reliability of personnel when comparing the provisions governing the reliability of the personnel of the laws mentioned above. 2. To evaluate the deadlines for submitting information about the inspected person established by provisions of mentioned laws. 3. To assess whether the personal data protection provisions applied in the personnel reliability verification procedures regulating the mentioned laws comply with the GDPR. When evaluating the provisions of both legal acts, the personnel reliability check was analysed in two main dimensions: firstly, the harmonization of concepts established in different legal acts; secondly, the terms during which information about the verified candidate is provided. During the research, it was identified that the provisions of the laws are not harmonized in themselves: different concepts are used to define the personnel reliability check (personnel due diligence), and the terms of the reliability check are not balanced. Furthermore, the provisions of the Law on the Protection of Important Objects for Ensuring National Security must be amended by refusing to collect consent from individuals, stating that the person must be informed about their verification, which is carried out in accordance with the legal obligation applicable to the Data Controller, which should be provided for in the law mentioned above. Therefore, proposals for improving the provisions of the law are presented. After conducting a comparative assessment of the content of the personnel reliability check, the synchronization of relevant concepts provided for in the aforementioned laws is proposed. Secondly, when evaluating the different deadlines for submitting information about the verified candidate, it is suggested to balance them in order to make it possible to make the final decision on the candidate’s employment more efficiently. Thirdly, when comparing the targeted provisions of the above-mentioned laws regulating the protection of personal data, the established justification of the different regulations is missing. Therefore, suggestions are made on how to harmonize the provisions for ensuring the protection of personal data in the laws mentioned above, so that they meet the requirements of the GDPR – the candidate’s consent to verification should not be taken, but the obligation to perform such a verification must be established, thus ensuring the supremacy of the universal good. https://ojs.mruni.eu/ojs/jurisprudence/article/view/7688corruption preventiondue diligenceensuring the reliability of personnelnational securitydata protection
spellingShingle Žaneta Navickienė
Artūras Kinkevičius
IMPROVING PERSONNEL RELIABILITY CHECKS THROUGH THE HARMONIZATION OF NATIONAL AND EU LEGISLATION
Jurisprudencija
corruption prevention
due diligence
ensuring the reliability of personnel
national security
data protection
title IMPROVING PERSONNEL RELIABILITY CHECKS THROUGH THE HARMONIZATION OF NATIONAL AND EU LEGISLATION
title_full IMPROVING PERSONNEL RELIABILITY CHECKS THROUGH THE HARMONIZATION OF NATIONAL AND EU LEGISLATION
title_fullStr IMPROVING PERSONNEL RELIABILITY CHECKS THROUGH THE HARMONIZATION OF NATIONAL AND EU LEGISLATION
title_full_unstemmed IMPROVING PERSONNEL RELIABILITY CHECKS THROUGH THE HARMONIZATION OF NATIONAL AND EU LEGISLATION
title_short IMPROVING PERSONNEL RELIABILITY CHECKS THROUGH THE HARMONIZATION OF NATIONAL AND EU LEGISLATION
title_sort improving personnel reliability checks through the harmonization of national and eu legislation
topic corruption prevention
due diligence
ensuring the reliability of personnel
national security
data protection
url https://ojs.mruni.eu/ojs/jurisprudence/article/view/7688
work_keys_str_mv AT zanetanavickiene improvingpersonnelreliabilitychecksthroughtheharmonizationofnationalandeulegislation
AT arturaskinkevicius improvingpersonnelreliabilitychecksthroughtheharmonizationofnationalandeulegislation