Anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: Clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-up

Introduction: Cervical stenosis and concurrent Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy (CSM) are prevalent in the elderly. Treatment options include Anterior Cervical Discectomy Fusion (ACDF) and Posterior Decompression and Fusion (PDF). Research question: This study aims to compare clinical outcomes and co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pavlina Lenga, Gelo Gülec, Karl Kiening, Andreas W. Unterberg, Basem Ishak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-01-01
Series:Brain and Spine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529423009712
_version_ 1797398898707267584
author Pavlina Lenga
Gelo Gülec
Karl Kiening
Andreas W. Unterberg
Basem Ishak
author_facet Pavlina Lenga
Gelo Gülec
Karl Kiening
Andreas W. Unterberg
Basem Ishak
author_sort Pavlina Lenga
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Cervical stenosis and concurrent Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy (CSM) are prevalent in the elderly. Treatment options include Anterior Cervical Discectomy Fusion (ACDF) and Posterior Decompression and Fusion (PDF). Research question: This study aims to compare clinical outcomes and complications between ACDF and PDF in patients aged 80 and above. Material and methods: Data from electronic medical records between 2005 and 2021 at a single institution were analyzed. Logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to explore risk factors and the relationship between comorbidities and neurological conditions. Results: 21 patients with ACDF and 26 with PDF were studied over 16 years. PDF patients had more operated levels, higher blood loss, and longer hospital stays, but mortality rates and mJOA improvements were similar in both groups. The presence of comorbidities was a unique risk factor for postoperative complications. Discussion and conclusion: ACDF and PDF led to neurological improvements in elderly CSM patients. However, the decision of surgical procedure should carefully consider the potential for postoperative complications, particularly in patients with comorbidities.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T01:32:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-57184bd156ff43ac86a14dcb1ed5651f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2772-5294
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T01:32:11Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Brain and Spine
spelling doaj.art-57184bd156ff43ac86a14dcb1ed5651f2023-12-09T06:09:15ZengElsevierBrain and Spine2772-52942023-01-013102683Anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: Clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-upPavlina Lenga0Gelo Gülec1Karl Kiening2Andreas W. Unterberg3Basem Ishak4Corresponding author. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.; Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, GermanyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, GermanyIntroduction: Cervical stenosis and concurrent Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy (CSM) are prevalent in the elderly. Treatment options include Anterior Cervical Discectomy Fusion (ACDF) and Posterior Decompression and Fusion (PDF). Research question: This study aims to compare clinical outcomes and complications between ACDF and PDF in patients aged 80 and above. Material and methods: Data from electronic medical records between 2005 and 2021 at a single institution were analyzed. Logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to explore risk factors and the relationship between comorbidities and neurological conditions. Results: 21 patients with ACDF and 26 with PDF were studied over 16 years. PDF patients had more operated levels, higher blood loss, and longer hospital stays, but mortality rates and mJOA improvements were similar in both groups. The presence of comorbidities was a unique risk factor for postoperative complications. Discussion and conclusion: ACDF and PDF led to neurological improvements in elderly CSM patients. However, the decision of surgical procedure should carefully consider the potential for postoperative complications, particularly in patients with comorbidities.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529423009712cervical myelopathyAnterior cervical discectomyposterior decompression
spellingShingle Pavlina Lenga
Gelo Gülec
Karl Kiening
Andreas W. Unterberg
Basem Ishak
Anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: Clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-up
Brain and Spine
cervical myelopathy
Anterior cervical discectomy
posterior decompression
title Anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: Clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-up
title_full Anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: Clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-up
title_fullStr Anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: Clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: Clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-up
title_short Anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: Clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-up
title_sort anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy clinical outcomes and complications with a 3 year follow up
topic cervical myelopathy
Anterior cervical discectomy
posterior decompression
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529423009712
work_keys_str_mv AT pavlinalenga anteriorcervicaldiscectomyfusionversusposteriordecompressionandfusioninoctogenarianswithcervicalmyelopathyclinicaloutcomesandcomplicationswitha3yearfollowup
AT gelogulec anteriorcervicaldiscectomyfusionversusposteriordecompressionandfusioninoctogenarianswithcervicalmyelopathyclinicaloutcomesandcomplicationswitha3yearfollowup
AT karlkiening anteriorcervicaldiscectomyfusionversusposteriordecompressionandfusioninoctogenarianswithcervicalmyelopathyclinicaloutcomesandcomplicationswitha3yearfollowup
AT andreaswunterberg anteriorcervicaldiscectomyfusionversusposteriordecompressionandfusioninoctogenarianswithcervicalmyelopathyclinicaloutcomesandcomplicationswitha3yearfollowup
AT basemishak anteriorcervicaldiscectomyfusionversusposteriordecompressionandfusioninoctogenarianswithcervicalmyelopathyclinicaloutcomesandcomplicationswitha3yearfollowup