Clinimetric evaluation and clinical outcomes of the Dutch version of the Chronic Ear Survey

Abstract Background To validate and evaluate the reliability of the Dutch version of the Chronic Ear Survey (CES) in patients suffering from Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media (CSOM) and to evaluate clinical outcomes of surgery using this questionnaire. Methods We developed the Dutch version of the CE...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Geerse, R. J. de Haan, M. J. F. de Wolf, F. A. Ebbens, E. van Spronsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-06-01
Series:Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12955-019-1173-2
_version_ 1818262091003330560
author S. Geerse
R. J. de Haan
M. J. F. de Wolf
F. A. Ebbens
E. van Spronsen
author_facet S. Geerse
R. J. de Haan
M. J. F. de Wolf
F. A. Ebbens
E. van Spronsen
author_sort S. Geerse
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background To validate and evaluate the reliability of the Dutch version of the Chronic Ear Survey (CES) in patients suffering from Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media (CSOM) and to evaluate clinical outcomes of surgery using this questionnaire. Methods We developed the Dutch version of the CES (D-CES) using forward-backward translation of the original CES into the Dutch language. Next, patients with CSOM and controls completed the D-CES pre- and postoperatively. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, known-group validity and convergent validity were evaluated. In addition to the D-CES, the Short Form 36 (SF-36) was administered to all participants to correlate D-CES data to quality of life. Results A total of 29 patients with CSOM scheduled for ear surgery were included. Our control group consisted of 26 patients scheduled for eye surgery, all without signs and symptoms of CSOM. Cronbachs’ α of the complete questionnaire was 0.69. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs), reflecting test-retest reliability, ranged between 0.69 and 0.82. Scores differed significantly between CSOM patients and controls with substantial lower (more impaired) D-CES scores in the CSOM group. Duration of complaints preoperatively and the presence of a dry ear and/or improvement of hearing postoperatively all had a significant impact on D-CES improvement scores. Small to moderate correlations were found between D-CES subscales and matching subscales of the SF-36. Conclusion The D-CES is an appropriate disease specific questionnaire to assess a patient’s perceived functional health in CSOM.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T18:57:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-572696615a734e00b5ab9354394cae1c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1477-7525
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T18:57:36Z
publishDate 2019-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
spelling doaj.art-572696615a734e00b5ab9354394cae1c2022-12-22T00:15:12ZengBMCHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes1477-75252019-06-011711710.1186/s12955-019-1173-2Clinimetric evaluation and clinical outcomes of the Dutch version of the Chronic Ear SurveyS. Geerse0R. J. de Haan1M. J. F. de Wolf2F. A. Ebbens3E. van Spronsen4Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam UMC, University of AmsterdamClinical Research Unit, Amsterdam UMC, University of AmsterdamDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam UMC, University of AmsterdamDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam UMC, University of AmsterdamDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam UMC, University of AmsterdamAbstract Background To validate and evaluate the reliability of the Dutch version of the Chronic Ear Survey (CES) in patients suffering from Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media (CSOM) and to evaluate clinical outcomes of surgery using this questionnaire. Methods We developed the Dutch version of the CES (D-CES) using forward-backward translation of the original CES into the Dutch language. Next, patients with CSOM and controls completed the D-CES pre- and postoperatively. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, known-group validity and convergent validity were evaluated. In addition to the D-CES, the Short Form 36 (SF-36) was administered to all participants to correlate D-CES data to quality of life. Results A total of 29 patients with CSOM scheduled for ear surgery were included. Our control group consisted of 26 patients scheduled for eye surgery, all without signs and symptoms of CSOM. Cronbachs’ α of the complete questionnaire was 0.69. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs), reflecting test-retest reliability, ranged between 0.69 and 0.82. Scores differed significantly between CSOM patients and controls with substantial lower (more impaired) D-CES scores in the CSOM group. Duration of complaints preoperatively and the presence of a dry ear and/or improvement of hearing postoperatively all had a significant impact on D-CES improvement scores. Small to moderate correlations were found between D-CES subscales and matching subscales of the SF-36. Conclusion The D-CES is an appropriate disease specific questionnaire to assess a patient’s perceived functional health in CSOM.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12955-019-1173-2Surveys and questionnairesTranslationsOutcome assessmentQuality of lifeOtitis media, Suppurative
spellingShingle S. Geerse
R. J. de Haan
M. J. F. de Wolf
F. A. Ebbens
E. van Spronsen
Clinimetric evaluation and clinical outcomes of the Dutch version of the Chronic Ear Survey
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Surveys and questionnaires
Translations
Outcome assessment
Quality of life
Otitis media, Suppurative
title Clinimetric evaluation and clinical outcomes of the Dutch version of the Chronic Ear Survey
title_full Clinimetric evaluation and clinical outcomes of the Dutch version of the Chronic Ear Survey
title_fullStr Clinimetric evaluation and clinical outcomes of the Dutch version of the Chronic Ear Survey
title_full_unstemmed Clinimetric evaluation and clinical outcomes of the Dutch version of the Chronic Ear Survey
title_short Clinimetric evaluation and clinical outcomes of the Dutch version of the Chronic Ear Survey
title_sort clinimetric evaluation and clinical outcomes of the dutch version of the chronic ear survey
topic Surveys and questionnaires
Translations
Outcome assessment
Quality of life
Otitis media, Suppurative
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12955-019-1173-2
work_keys_str_mv AT sgeerse clinimetricevaluationandclinicaloutcomesofthedutchversionofthechronicearsurvey
AT rjdehaan clinimetricevaluationandclinicaloutcomesofthedutchversionofthechronicearsurvey
AT mjfdewolf clinimetricevaluationandclinicaloutcomesofthedutchversionofthechronicearsurvey
AT faebbens clinimetricevaluationandclinicaloutcomesofthedutchversionofthechronicearsurvey
AT evanspronsen clinimetricevaluationandclinicaloutcomesofthedutchversionofthechronicearsurvey