Comparison of Self-Reported and Accelerometer-Assessed Physical Activity in Older Women.

Self-reported physical activity measures continue to be validated against accelerometers; however, the absence of standardized, accelerometer moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) definitions has made comparisons across studies difficult. Furthermore, recent accelerometer models assess accel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eric J Shiroma, Nancy R Cook, JoAnn E Manson, Julie E Buring, Eric B Rimm, I-Min Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4694656?pdf=render
_version_ 1828738683873787904
author Eric J Shiroma
Nancy R Cook
JoAnn E Manson
Julie E Buring
Eric B Rimm
I-Min Lee
author_facet Eric J Shiroma
Nancy R Cook
JoAnn E Manson
Julie E Buring
Eric B Rimm
I-Min Lee
author_sort Eric J Shiroma
collection DOAJ
description Self-reported physical activity measures continue to be validated against accelerometers; however, the absence of standardized, accelerometer moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) definitions has made comparisons across studies difficult. Furthermore, recent accelerometer models assess accelerations in three axes, instead of only the vertical axis, but validation studies have yet to take incorporate triaxial data.Participants (n = 10 115) from the Women's Health Study wore a hip-worn accelerometer (ActiGraph GT3X+) for seven days during waking hours (2011-2014). Women then completed a physical activity questionnaire. We compared self-reported with accelerometer-assessed MVPA, using four established cutpoints for MVPA: three using only vertical axis data (760, 1041 and 1952 counts per minute (cpm)) and one using triaxial data (2690 cpm).According to self-reported physical activity, 66.6% of women met the US federal physical activity guidelines, engaging in ≥150 minutes per week of MVPA. The percent of women who met guidelines varied widely depending on the accelerometer MVPA definition (760 cpm: 50.0%, 1041 cpm: 33.0%, 1952 cpm: 13.4%, and 2690 cpm: 19.3%).Triaxial count data do not substantially reduce the difference between self-reported and accelerometer-assessed MVPA.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T00:07:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-57300153e0cd4e32b9b495c8fbb75dcd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T00:07:55Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-57300153e0cd4e32b9b495c8fbb75dcd2022-12-22T03:11:10ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-011012e014595010.1371/journal.pone.0145950Comparison of Self-Reported and Accelerometer-Assessed Physical Activity in Older Women.Eric J ShiromaNancy R CookJoAnn E MansonJulie E BuringEric B RimmI-Min LeeSelf-reported physical activity measures continue to be validated against accelerometers; however, the absence of standardized, accelerometer moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) definitions has made comparisons across studies difficult. Furthermore, recent accelerometer models assess accelerations in three axes, instead of only the vertical axis, but validation studies have yet to take incorporate triaxial data.Participants (n = 10 115) from the Women's Health Study wore a hip-worn accelerometer (ActiGraph GT3X+) for seven days during waking hours (2011-2014). Women then completed a physical activity questionnaire. We compared self-reported with accelerometer-assessed MVPA, using four established cutpoints for MVPA: three using only vertical axis data (760, 1041 and 1952 counts per minute (cpm)) and one using triaxial data (2690 cpm).According to self-reported physical activity, 66.6% of women met the US federal physical activity guidelines, engaging in ≥150 minutes per week of MVPA. The percent of women who met guidelines varied widely depending on the accelerometer MVPA definition (760 cpm: 50.0%, 1041 cpm: 33.0%, 1952 cpm: 13.4%, and 2690 cpm: 19.3%).Triaxial count data do not substantially reduce the difference between self-reported and accelerometer-assessed MVPA.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4694656?pdf=render
spellingShingle Eric J Shiroma
Nancy R Cook
JoAnn E Manson
Julie E Buring
Eric B Rimm
I-Min Lee
Comparison of Self-Reported and Accelerometer-Assessed Physical Activity in Older Women.
PLoS ONE
title Comparison of Self-Reported and Accelerometer-Assessed Physical Activity in Older Women.
title_full Comparison of Self-Reported and Accelerometer-Assessed Physical Activity in Older Women.
title_fullStr Comparison of Self-Reported and Accelerometer-Assessed Physical Activity in Older Women.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Self-Reported and Accelerometer-Assessed Physical Activity in Older Women.
title_short Comparison of Self-Reported and Accelerometer-Assessed Physical Activity in Older Women.
title_sort comparison of self reported and accelerometer assessed physical activity in older women
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4694656?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT ericjshiroma comparisonofselfreportedandaccelerometerassessedphysicalactivityinolderwomen
AT nancyrcook comparisonofselfreportedandaccelerometerassessedphysicalactivityinolderwomen
AT joannemanson comparisonofselfreportedandaccelerometerassessedphysicalactivityinolderwomen
AT julieeburing comparisonofselfreportedandaccelerometerassessedphysicalactivityinolderwomen
AT ericbrimm comparisonofselfreportedandaccelerometerassessedphysicalactivityinolderwomen
AT iminlee comparisonofselfreportedandaccelerometerassessedphysicalactivityinolderwomen