Neuroenhancement as Instrumental Drug Use: Putting the Debate in a Different Frame
The use of performance-enhancing drugs to study or work better is often called “cognitive enhancement” or “neuroenhancement” and sparked a debate between scholars from many disciplines. I argue that such behavior can better be subsumed under the more general category of “instrumental drug use”. This...
Main Author: | Stephan Schleim |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychiatry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.567497/full |
Similar Items
-
How Realistic Are the Scientific Assumptions of the Neuroenhancement Debate? Assessing the Pharmacological Optimism and Neuroenhancement Prevalence Hypotheses
by: Stephan Schleim, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Drugs as instruments: Describing and testing a behavioral approach to the study of neuroenhancement
by: Ralf Brand, et al.
Published: (2016-08-01) -
Smart drugs and neuroenhancement: what do we know?
by: Massimiliano Esposito, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01) -
Episodic memories and their relevance for psychoactive drug use and addiction
by: Christian P. Müller
Published: (2013-05-01) -
Regional workshop on opiate drug consumption : opiate drug consumption patterns in Asia, 9-12 December, 1981, University of Science Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia /
by: Regional Workshop on Opiate Drug Consumption in Asia (1981 : Penang, Malaysia), et al.
Published: (1981)