Publication bias in psychology: a diagnosis based on the correlation between effect size and sample size.
The p value obtained from a significance test provides no information about the magnitude or importance of the underlying phenomenon. Therefore, additional reporting of effect size is often recommended. Effect sizes are theoretically independent from sample size. Yet this may not hold true empirical...
Main Authors: | Anton Kühberger, Astrid Fritz, Thomas Scherndl |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4156299?pdf=render |
Similar Items
-
Publication bias in psychology: A closer look at the correlation between sample size and effect size.
by: Audrey Helen Linden, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Publication bias in psychology: A closer look at the correlation between sample size and effect size
by: Audrey Helen Linden, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Self-correction in science: The effect of retraction on the frequency of citations.
by: Anton Kühberger, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01) -
Self-correction in science: The effect of retraction on the frequency of citations
by: Anton Kühberger, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01) -
Reaction Time and Cognitive Psychology: Two procedures to avoid sample size bias.
by: Perea M.
Published: (1999-01-01)