A comparison of drone imagery and ground-based methods for estimating the extent of habitat destruction by lesser snow geese (Anser caerulescens caerulescens) in La Pérouse Bay.

Lesser snow goose (Anser caerulescens caerulescens) populations have dramatically altered vegetation communities through increased foraging pressure. In remote regions, regular habitat assessments are logistically challenging and time consuming. Drones are increasingly being used by ecologists to co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrew F Barnas, Brian J Darby, Gregory S Vandeberg, Robert F Rockwell, Susan N Ellis-Felege
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217049
_version_ 1828917245478174720
author Andrew F Barnas
Brian J Darby
Gregory S Vandeberg
Robert F Rockwell
Susan N Ellis-Felege
author_facet Andrew F Barnas
Brian J Darby
Gregory S Vandeberg
Robert F Rockwell
Susan N Ellis-Felege
author_sort Andrew F Barnas
collection DOAJ
description Lesser snow goose (Anser caerulescens caerulescens) populations have dramatically altered vegetation communities through increased foraging pressure. In remote regions, regular habitat assessments are logistically challenging and time consuming. Drones are increasingly being used by ecologists to conduct habitat assessments, but reliance on georeferenced data as ground truth may not always be feasible. We estimated goose habitat degradation using photointerpretation of drone imagery and compared estimates to those made with ground-based linear transects. In July 2016, we surveyed five study plots in La Pérouse Bay, Manitoba, to evaluate the effectiveness of a fixed-wing drone with simple Red Green Blue (RGB) imagery for evaluating habitat degradation by snow geese. Ground-based land cover data was collected and grouped into barren, shrub, or non-shrub categories. We compared estimates between ground-based transects and those made from unsupervised classification of drone imagery collected at altitudes of 75, 100, and 120 m above ground level (ground sampling distances of 2.4, 3.2, and 3.8 cm respectively). We found large time savings during the data collection step of drone surveys, but these savings were ultimately lost during imagery processing. Based on photointerpretation, overall accuracy of drone imagery was generally high (88.8% to 92.0%) and Kappa coefficients were similar to previously published habitat assessments from drone imagery. Mixed model estimates indicated 75m drone imagery overestimated barren (F2,182 = 100.03, P < 0.0001) and shrub classes (F2,182 = 160.16, P < 0.0001) compared to ground estimates. Inconspicuous graminoid and forb species (non-shrubs) were difficult to detect from drone imagery and were underestimated compared to ground-based transects (F2,182 = 843.77, P < 0.0001). Our findings corroborate previous findings, and that simple RGB imagery is useful for evaluating broad scale goose damage, and may play an important role in measuring habitat destruction by geese and other agents of environmental change.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T20:47:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-574b5b3134eb49adbac37ae77c5a7133
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T20:47:45Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-574b5b3134eb49adbac37ae77c5a71332022-12-21T23:31:57ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01148e021704910.1371/journal.pone.0217049A comparison of drone imagery and ground-based methods for estimating the extent of habitat destruction by lesser snow geese (Anser caerulescens caerulescens) in La Pérouse Bay.Andrew F BarnasBrian J DarbyGregory S VandebergRobert F RockwellSusan N Ellis-FelegeLesser snow goose (Anser caerulescens caerulescens) populations have dramatically altered vegetation communities through increased foraging pressure. In remote regions, regular habitat assessments are logistically challenging and time consuming. Drones are increasingly being used by ecologists to conduct habitat assessments, but reliance on georeferenced data as ground truth may not always be feasible. We estimated goose habitat degradation using photointerpretation of drone imagery and compared estimates to those made with ground-based linear transects. In July 2016, we surveyed five study plots in La Pérouse Bay, Manitoba, to evaluate the effectiveness of a fixed-wing drone with simple Red Green Blue (RGB) imagery for evaluating habitat degradation by snow geese. Ground-based land cover data was collected and grouped into barren, shrub, or non-shrub categories. We compared estimates between ground-based transects and those made from unsupervised classification of drone imagery collected at altitudes of 75, 100, and 120 m above ground level (ground sampling distances of 2.4, 3.2, and 3.8 cm respectively). We found large time savings during the data collection step of drone surveys, but these savings were ultimately lost during imagery processing. Based on photointerpretation, overall accuracy of drone imagery was generally high (88.8% to 92.0%) and Kappa coefficients were similar to previously published habitat assessments from drone imagery. Mixed model estimates indicated 75m drone imagery overestimated barren (F2,182 = 100.03, P < 0.0001) and shrub classes (F2,182 = 160.16, P < 0.0001) compared to ground estimates. Inconspicuous graminoid and forb species (non-shrubs) were difficult to detect from drone imagery and were underestimated compared to ground-based transects (F2,182 = 843.77, P < 0.0001). Our findings corroborate previous findings, and that simple RGB imagery is useful for evaluating broad scale goose damage, and may play an important role in measuring habitat destruction by geese and other agents of environmental change.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217049
spellingShingle Andrew F Barnas
Brian J Darby
Gregory S Vandeberg
Robert F Rockwell
Susan N Ellis-Felege
A comparison of drone imagery and ground-based methods for estimating the extent of habitat destruction by lesser snow geese (Anser caerulescens caerulescens) in La Pérouse Bay.
PLoS ONE
title A comparison of drone imagery and ground-based methods for estimating the extent of habitat destruction by lesser snow geese (Anser caerulescens caerulescens) in La Pérouse Bay.
title_full A comparison of drone imagery and ground-based methods for estimating the extent of habitat destruction by lesser snow geese (Anser caerulescens caerulescens) in La Pérouse Bay.
title_fullStr A comparison of drone imagery and ground-based methods for estimating the extent of habitat destruction by lesser snow geese (Anser caerulescens caerulescens) in La Pérouse Bay.
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of drone imagery and ground-based methods for estimating the extent of habitat destruction by lesser snow geese (Anser caerulescens caerulescens) in La Pérouse Bay.
title_short A comparison of drone imagery and ground-based methods for estimating the extent of habitat destruction by lesser snow geese (Anser caerulescens caerulescens) in La Pérouse Bay.
title_sort comparison of drone imagery and ground based methods for estimating the extent of habitat destruction by lesser snow geese anser caerulescens caerulescens in la perouse bay
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217049
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewfbarnas acomparisonofdroneimageryandgroundbasedmethodsforestimatingtheextentofhabitatdestructionbylessersnowgeeseansercaerulescenscaerulescensinlaperousebay
AT brianjdarby acomparisonofdroneimageryandgroundbasedmethodsforestimatingtheextentofhabitatdestructionbylessersnowgeeseansercaerulescenscaerulescensinlaperousebay
AT gregorysvandeberg acomparisonofdroneimageryandgroundbasedmethodsforestimatingtheextentofhabitatdestructionbylessersnowgeeseansercaerulescenscaerulescensinlaperousebay
AT robertfrockwell acomparisonofdroneimageryandgroundbasedmethodsforestimatingtheextentofhabitatdestructionbylessersnowgeeseansercaerulescenscaerulescensinlaperousebay
AT susannellisfelege acomparisonofdroneimageryandgroundbasedmethodsforestimatingtheextentofhabitatdestructionbylessersnowgeeseansercaerulescenscaerulescensinlaperousebay
AT andrewfbarnas comparisonofdroneimageryandgroundbasedmethodsforestimatingtheextentofhabitatdestructionbylessersnowgeeseansercaerulescenscaerulescensinlaperousebay
AT brianjdarby comparisonofdroneimageryandgroundbasedmethodsforestimatingtheextentofhabitatdestructionbylessersnowgeeseansercaerulescenscaerulescensinlaperousebay
AT gregorysvandeberg comparisonofdroneimageryandgroundbasedmethodsforestimatingtheextentofhabitatdestructionbylessersnowgeeseansercaerulescenscaerulescensinlaperousebay
AT robertfrockwell comparisonofdroneimageryandgroundbasedmethodsforestimatingtheextentofhabitatdestructionbylessersnowgeeseansercaerulescenscaerulescensinlaperousebay
AT susannellisfelege comparisonofdroneimageryandgroundbasedmethodsforestimatingtheextentofhabitatdestructionbylessersnowgeeseansercaerulescenscaerulescensinlaperousebay