Multi-population comparison of resource exploitation by island foxes: Implications for conservation

Imperiled island foxes are inherently resource-limited by their insular ecology. We examined food use on all 6 islands where they occur to assess resource exploitation patterns. Over 40 different food items were identified with item use varying among islands. Sixteen items occurred with ≥10% frequen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B.L. Cypher, A.Y. Madrid, C.L. Van Horn Job, E.C. Kelly, S.W.R. Harrison, T.L. Westall
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2014-12-01
Series:Global Ecology and Conservation
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989414000493
_version_ 1828281804013961216
author B.L. Cypher
A.Y. Madrid
C.L. Van Horn Job
E.C. Kelly
S.W.R. Harrison
T.L. Westall
author_facet B.L. Cypher
A.Y. Madrid
C.L. Van Horn Job
E.C. Kelly
S.W.R. Harrison
T.L. Westall
author_sort B.L. Cypher
collection DOAJ
description Imperiled island foxes are inherently resource-limited by their insular ecology. We examined food use on all 6 islands where they occur to assess resource exploitation patterns. Over 40 different food items were identified with item use varying among islands. Sixteen items occurred with ≥10% frequency in annual fox diets: deer mice, birds, lizards, beetles, beetle larvae, Jerusalem crickets, silk-spinning sand crickets, grasshoppers, earwigs, snails, and fruits of toyon, manzanita, prickly pear cactus, ice plant, Australian saltbush, and summer holly. Foxes used a diversity of food items with variations among islands attributable to island-specific availabilities. Deer mice in particular appeared to be preferred. Foxes also exhibited extensive use of non-native items, such as ice plant fruits, European snails, and earwigs, and foxes may even be dependent on these items on some islands. To increase food security and promote population stability, we recommend (1) continuing and enhancing habitat restoration efforts on all islands, (2) increasing the abundance of native items in association with any removals of non-native species used by foxes, and (3) monitoring annual trends in abundance of key food items as well as periodic monitoring of item use by foxes to determine functional responses to changes in item availability. Keywords: Channel islands, Endangered species, Food-item selection, Foraging ecology, Island fox, Urocyon littoralis
first_indexed 2024-04-13T08:21:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-575c5bbbd6b04c348b8d4f5d31a810bb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2351-9894
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T08:21:08Z
publishDate 2014-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Global Ecology and Conservation
spelling doaj.art-575c5bbbd6b04c348b8d4f5d31a810bb2022-12-22T02:54:38ZengElsevierGlobal Ecology and Conservation2351-98942014-12-012255266Multi-population comparison of resource exploitation by island foxes: Implications for conservationB.L. Cypher0A.Y. Madrid1C.L. Van Horn Job2E.C. Kelly3S.W.R. Harrison4T.L. Westall5Correspondence to: California State University-Stanislaus, Endangered Species Recovery Program, P.O. Box 9622, Bakersfield, CA 93389, United States. Tel.: +1 661 835 7810.; California State University-Stanislaus, Endangered Species Recovery Program, One University Circle, Turlock, CA 93582, United StatesCalifornia State University-Stanislaus, Endangered Species Recovery Program, One University Circle, Turlock, CA 93582, United StatesCalifornia State University-Stanislaus, Endangered Species Recovery Program, One University Circle, Turlock, CA 93582, United StatesCalifornia State University-Stanislaus, Endangered Species Recovery Program, One University Circle, Turlock, CA 93582, United StatesCalifornia State University-Stanislaus, Endangered Species Recovery Program, One University Circle, Turlock, CA 93582, United StatesCalifornia State University-Stanislaus, Endangered Species Recovery Program, One University Circle, Turlock, CA 93582, United StatesImperiled island foxes are inherently resource-limited by their insular ecology. We examined food use on all 6 islands where they occur to assess resource exploitation patterns. Over 40 different food items were identified with item use varying among islands. Sixteen items occurred with ≥10% frequency in annual fox diets: deer mice, birds, lizards, beetles, beetle larvae, Jerusalem crickets, silk-spinning sand crickets, grasshoppers, earwigs, snails, and fruits of toyon, manzanita, prickly pear cactus, ice plant, Australian saltbush, and summer holly. Foxes used a diversity of food items with variations among islands attributable to island-specific availabilities. Deer mice in particular appeared to be preferred. Foxes also exhibited extensive use of non-native items, such as ice plant fruits, European snails, and earwigs, and foxes may even be dependent on these items on some islands. To increase food security and promote population stability, we recommend (1) continuing and enhancing habitat restoration efforts on all islands, (2) increasing the abundance of native items in association with any removals of non-native species used by foxes, and (3) monitoring annual trends in abundance of key food items as well as periodic monitoring of item use by foxes to determine functional responses to changes in item availability. Keywords: Channel islands, Endangered species, Food-item selection, Foraging ecology, Island fox, Urocyon littoralishttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989414000493
spellingShingle B.L. Cypher
A.Y. Madrid
C.L. Van Horn Job
E.C. Kelly
S.W.R. Harrison
T.L. Westall
Multi-population comparison of resource exploitation by island foxes: Implications for conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation
title Multi-population comparison of resource exploitation by island foxes: Implications for conservation
title_full Multi-population comparison of resource exploitation by island foxes: Implications for conservation
title_fullStr Multi-population comparison of resource exploitation by island foxes: Implications for conservation
title_full_unstemmed Multi-population comparison of resource exploitation by island foxes: Implications for conservation
title_short Multi-population comparison of resource exploitation by island foxes: Implications for conservation
title_sort multi population comparison of resource exploitation by island foxes implications for conservation
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989414000493
work_keys_str_mv AT blcypher multipopulationcomparisonofresourceexploitationbyislandfoxesimplicationsforconservation
AT aymadrid multipopulationcomparisonofresourceexploitationbyislandfoxesimplicationsforconservation
AT clvanhornjob multipopulationcomparisonofresourceexploitationbyislandfoxesimplicationsforconservation
AT eckelly multipopulationcomparisonofresourceexploitationbyislandfoxesimplicationsforconservation
AT swrharrison multipopulationcomparisonofresourceexploitationbyislandfoxesimplicationsforconservation
AT tlwestall multipopulationcomparisonofresourceexploitationbyislandfoxesimplicationsforconservation