In defense of a «Spirit of Freedom»

The following essay aims to elaborate a comparative study between the political theories of Kant and Hobbes, based on the second part of the Kantian essay Theory and Practice. The first part of the essay studies the legitimizing sources suggested by Kant and Hobbes to explain the need for a civil s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Inês Beatriz Ferreira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Coimbra University Press 2024-03-01
Series:Revista Filosófica de Coimbra
Subjects:
Online Access:https://impactum-journals.uc.pt/rfc/article/view/13479
_version_ 1827307602784026624
author Inês Beatriz Ferreira
author_facet Inês Beatriz Ferreira
author_sort Inês Beatriz Ferreira
collection DOAJ
description The following essay aims to elaborate a comparative study between the political theories of Kant and Hobbes, based on the second part of the Kantian essay Theory and Practice. The first part of the essay studies the legitimizing sources suggested by Kant and Hobbes to explain the need for a civil state. The second part analyzes the three republican principles suggested by Kant and compares them with the Hobbesian proposal. The third part studies the direct critique of Kant to Hobbes; it shows how Kant presents his critique in a way that highlights his principle of independence, absent in Hobbes. Finally, starting from an important point of convergence between the authors – the defense of an absolute duty of obedience –, other interpretative possibilities are explored in order to investigate the possibility of finding a recognition or a prudent openness to the question of disobedience.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T18:41:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-575e76542832408f928e0d14c3bddbc6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0872-0851
2184-7584
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T18:41:56Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Coimbra University Press
record_format Article
series Revista Filosófica de Coimbra
spelling doaj.art-575e76542832408f928e0d14c3bddbc62024-03-27T10:19:24ZengCoimbra University PressRevista Filosófica de Coimbra0872-08512184-75842024-03-01336510.14195/0872-0851_65_4In defense of a «Spirit of Freedom»Inês Beatriz Ferreira0Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Letras The following essay aims to elaborate a comparative study between the political theories of Kant and Hobbes, based on the second part of the Kantian essay Theory and Practice. The first part of the essay studies the legitimizing sources suggested by Kant and Hobbes to explain the need for a civil state. The second part analyzes the three republican principles suggested by Kant and compares them with the Hobbesian proposal. The third part studies the direct critique of Kant to Hobbes; it shows how Kant presents his critique in a way that highlights his principle of independence, absent in Hobbes. Finally, starting from an important point of convergence between the authors – the defense of an absolute duty of obedience –, other interpretative possibilities are explored in order to investigate the possibility of finding a recognition or a prudent openness to the question of disobedience. https://impactum-journals.uc.pt/rfc/article/view/13479KantHobbescivil staterepublicanismobedienceprinciple of independence
spellingShingle Inês Beatriz Ferreira
In defense of a «Spirit of Freedom»
Revista Filosófica de Coimbra
Kant
Hobbes
civil state
republicanism
obedience
principle of independence
title In defense of a «Spirit of Freedom»
title_full In defense of a «Spirit of Freedom»
title_fullStr In defense of a «Spirit of Freedom»
title_full_unstemmed In defense of a «Spirit of Freedom»
title_short In defense of a «Spirit of Freedom»
title_sort in defense of a spirit of freedom
topic Kant
Hobbes
civil state
republicanism
obedience
principle of independence
url https://impactum-journals.uc.pt/rfc/article/view/13479
work_keys_str_mv AT inesbeatrizferreira indefenseofaspiritoffreedom