Large-scale EEG neural network changes in response to therapeutic TMS

Background: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an effective therapy for patients with treatment-resistant depression. TMS likely induces functional connectivity changes in aberrant circuits implicated in depression. Electroencephalography (EEG) “microstates” are topographies hypothesized to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael C. Gold, Shiwen Yuan, Eric Tirrell, E. Frances Kronenberg, Jee Won D. Kang, Lauren Hindley, Mohamed Sherif, Joshua C. Brown, Linda L. Carpenter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-03-01
Series:Brain Stimulation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X22000080
_version_ 1818083602958647296
author Michael C. Gold
Shiwen Yuan
Eric Tirrell
E. Frances Kronenberg
Jee Won D. Kang
Lauren Hindley
Mohamed Sherif
Joshua C. Brown
Linda L. Carpenter
author_facet Michael C. Gold
Shiwen Yuan
Eric Tirrell
E. Frances Kronenberg
Jee Won D. Kang
Lauren Hindley
Mohamed Sherif
Joshua C. Brown
Linda L. Carpenter
author_sort Michael C. Gold
collection DOAJ
description Background: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an effective therapy for patients with treatment-resistant depression. TMS likely induces functional connectivity changes in aberrant circuits implicated in depression. Electroencephalography (EEG) “microstates” are topographies hypothesized to represent large-scale resting networks. Canonical microstates have recently been proposed as markers for major depressive disorder (MDD), but it is not known if or how they change following TMS. Methods: Resting EEG was obtained from 49 MDD patients at baseline and following six weeks of daily TMS. Polarity-insensitive modified k-means clustering was used to segment EEGs into constituent microstates. Microstates were localized via sLORETA. Repeated-measures mixed models tested for within-subject differences over time and t-tests compared microstate features between TMS responder and non-responder groups. Results: Six microstates (MS-1 - MS-6) were identified from all available EEG data. Clinical response to TMS was associated with increases in features of MS-2, along with decreased metrics of MS-3. Nonresponders showed no significant changes in any microstate. Change in occurrence and coverage of both MS-2 (increased) and MS-3 (decreased) correlated with symptom change magnitude over the course of TMS treatment. Conclusions: We identified EEG microstates associated with clinical improvement following a course of TMS therapy. Results suggest selective modulation of resting networks observable by EEG, which is inexpensive and easily acquired in the clinic setting.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T19:40:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-576a017496524c36817d9304467cffb0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1935-861X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T19:40:37Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Brain Stimulation
spelling doaj.art-576a017496524c36817d9304467cffb02022-12-22T01:36:01ZengElsevierBrain Stimulation1935-861X2022-03-01152316325Large-scale EEG neural network changes in response to therapeutic TMSMichael C. Gold0Shiwen Yuan1Eric Tirrell2E. Frances Kronenberg3Jee Won D. Kang4Lauren Hindley5Mohamed Sherif6Joshua C. Brown7Linda L. Carpenter8Butler Hospital TMS Clinic and Neuromodulation Research Facility, Providence, RI, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, USAButler Hospital TMS Clinic and Neuromodulation Research Facility, Providence, RI, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, USAButler Hospital TMS Clinic and Neuromodulation Research Facility, Providence, RI, USAButler Hospital TMS Clinic and Neuromodulation Research Facility, Providence, RI, USAButler Hospital TMS Clinic and Neuromodulation Research Facility, Providence, RI, USAButler Hospital TMS Clinic and Neuromodulation Research Facility, Providence, RI, USADepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, USA; Lifespan Physician Group, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USAButler Hospital TMS Clinic and Neuromodulation Research Facility, Providence, RI, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, USAButler Hospital TMS Clinic and Neuromodulation Research Facility, Providence, RI, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, USA; Corresponding author. 345 Blackstone Blvd, Providence, RI, 02906, USA.Background: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an effective therapy for patients with treatment-resistant depression. TMS likely induces functional connectivity changes in aberrant circuits implicated in depression. Electroencephalography (EEG) “microstates” are topographies hypothesized to represent large-scale resting networks. Canonical microstates have recently been proposed as markers for major depressive disorder (MDD), but it is not known if or how they change following TMS. Methods: Resting EEG was obtained from 49 MDD patients at baseline and following six weeks of daily TMS. Polarity-insensitive modified k-means clustering was used to segment EEGs into constituent microstates. Microstates were localized via sLORETA. Repeated-measures mixed models tested for within-subject differences over time and t-tests compared microstate features between TMS responder and non-responder groups. Results: Six microstates (MS-1 - MS-6) were identified from all available EEG data. Clinical response to TMS was associated with increases in features of MS-2, along with decreased metrics of MS-3. Nonresponders showed no significant changes in any microstate. Change in occurrence and coverage of both MS-2 (increased) and MS-3 (decreased) correlated with symptom change magnitude over the course of TMS treatment. Conclusions: We identified EEG microstates associated with clinical improvement following a course of TMS therapy. Results suggest selective modulation of resting networks observable by EEG, which is inexpensive and easily acquired in the clinic setting.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X22000080TMSEEGMicrostatesMDDNeuromodulation
spellingShingle Michael C. Gold
Shiwen Yuan
Eric Tirrell
E. Frances Kronenberg
Jee Won D. Kang
Lauren Hindley
Mohamed Sherif
Joshua C. Brown
Linda L. Carpenter
Large-scale EEG neural network changes in response to therapeutic TMS
Brain Stimulation
TMS
EEG
Microstates
MDD
Neuromodulation
title Large-scale EEG neural network changes in response to therapeutic TMS
title_full Large-scale EEG neural network changes in response to therapeutic TMS
title_fullStr Large-scale EEG neural network changes in response to therapeutic TMS
title_full_unstemmed Large-scale EEG neural network changes in response to therapeutic TMS
title_short Large-scale EEG neural network changes in response to therapeutic TMS
title_sort large scale eeg neural network changes in response to therapeutic tms
topic TMS
EEG
Microstates
MDD
Neuromodulation
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X22000080
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelcgold largescaleeegneuralnetworkchangesinresponsetotherapeutictms
AT shiwenyuan largescaleeegneuralnetworkchangesinresponsetotherapeutictms
AT erictirrell largescaleeegneuralnetworkchangesinresponsetotherapeutictms
AT efranceskronenberg largescaleeegneuralnetworkchangesinresponsetotherapeutictms
AT jeewondkang largescaleeegneuralnetworkchangesinresponsetotherapeutictms
AT laurenhindley largescaleeegneuralnetworkchangesinresponsetotherapeutictms
AT mohamedsherif largescaleeegneuralnetworkchangesinresponsetotherapeutictms
AT joshuacbrown largescaleeegneuralnetworkchangesinresponsetotherapeutictms
AT lindalcarpenter largescaleeegneuralnetworkchangesinresponsetotherapeutictms