Evaluation of Cytotoxicity of Endoseal MTA Sealer as a Root Canal Perforation Restorative Material on Gingival Fibroblasts Compared to Iranian ProRoot MTA and CEM by MTT test

Introduction: Root canal perforation is a reason for root canal treatment failures. Cytocompatibility is an essential feature of a perforation restorative material. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the cytotoxicity of Endoseal MTA sealer as a root canal perforation restorative material on human...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Salma Omidi, Kosar Dadgar, Abbas Mesgarani, Mahmoud Moosazade, Fatemeh Zaghi Hosseinzadeh
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2022-12-01
Series:Journal of Mashhad Dental School
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jmds.mums.ac.ir/article_21406_4f2fadcc6578b60d13b00b6e2547d1e3.pdf
_version_ 1797978013590093824
author Salma Omidi
Kosar Dadgar
Abbas Mesgarani
Mahmoud Moosazade
Fatemeh Zaghi Hosseinzadeh
author_facet Salma Omidi
Kosar Dadgar
Abbas Mesgarani
Mahmoud Moosazade
Fatemeh Zaghi Hosseinzadeh
author_sort Salma Omidi
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Root canal perforation is a reason for root canal treatment failures. Cytocompatibility is an essential feature of a perforation restorative material. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the cytotoxicity of Endoseal MTA sealer as a root canal perforation restorative material on human gingival fibroblast cells in comparison to Iranian ProRoot MTA and CEM using tetrazolium-based colorimetric assay (MTT test). Materials and Methods: MTA, CEM, and Endoseal MTA were prepared and exposed (for 48 h) to cell culture media 72 h after setting. Human gingival fibroblasts were then cultivated and incubated for 24 h with different dilutions (1/2, 1/4, 1/8) of each sealer extract. Cell viability was evaluated using the MTT test. The data were compared using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.Result: There was a significant association between CEM cell viability and Endoseal MTA as well as between MTA and CEM in 1/2 dilution. No significant difference was found in 1/4 and 1/8 dilusions between the percentage of cell viability of different sealers.Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, although Endoseal MTA sealer is more toxic than CEM in ½ dilution, it has higher biocompatibility compared to MTA and can be considered as a perforation restorative material in terms of other favorable qualities.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T05:16:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-577e5090f37649d7a66c840c4bd91054
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1560-9286
2008-2347
language fas
last_indexed 2024-04-11T05:16:12Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Journal of Mashhad Dental School
spelling doaj.art-577e5090f37649d7a66c840c4bd910542022-12-24T10:16:47ZfasMashhad University of Medical SciencesJournal of Mashhad Dental School1560-92862008-23472022-12-0146430531510.22038/jmds.2022.58366.206321406Evaluation of Cytotoxicity of Endoseal MTA Sealer as a Root Canal Perforation Restorative Material on Gingival Fibroblasts Compared to Iranian ProRoot MTA and CEM by MTT testSalma Omidi0Kosar Dadgar1Abbas Mesgarani2Mahmoud Moosazade3Fatemeh Zaghi Hosseinzadeh4Assistant Professor, Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, IranAssistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran,Associate Professor, Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, IranAssistant Professor, Deapartment of Epidemiology, Health Sciences Research Center, Addiction Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran Gastrointestinal Cancer Research Centre, Non-communicable Diseases Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, IranDentist, Sari, IranIntroduction: Root canal perforation is a reason for root canal treatment failures. Cytocompatibility is an essential feature of a perforation restorative material. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the cytotoxicity of Endoseal MTA sealer as a root canal perforation restorative material on human gingival fibroblast cells in comparison to Iranian ProRoot MTA and CEM using tetrazolium-based colorimetric assay (MTT test). Materials and Methods: MTA, CEM, and Endoseal MTA were prepared and exposed (for 48 h) to cell culture media 72 h after setting. Human gingival fibroblasts were then cultivated and incubated for 24 h with different dilutions (1/2, 1/4, 1/8) of each sealer extract. Cell viability was evaluated using the MTT test. The data were compared using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.Result: There was a significant association between CEM cell viability and Endoseal MTA as well as between MTA and CEM in 1/2 dilution. No significant difference was found in 1/4 and 1/8 dilusions between the percentage of cell viability of different sealers.Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, although Endoseal MTA sealer is more toxic than CEM in ½ dilution, it has higher biocompatibility compared to MTA and can be considered as a perforation restorative material in terms of other favorable qualities.https://jmds.mums.ac.ir/article_21406_4f2fadcc6578b60d13b00b6e2547d1e3.pdfcemcytotoxicityendoseal mtamtt assaysealer
spellingShingle Salma Omidi
Kosar Dadgar
Abbas Mesgarani
Mahmoud Moosazade
Fatemeh Zaghi Hosseinzadeh
Evaluation of Cytotoxicity of Endoseal MTA Sealer as a Root Canal Perforation Restorative Material on Gingival Fibroblasts Compared to Iranian ProRoot MTA and CEM by MTT test
Journal of Mashhad Dental School
cem
cytotoxicity
endoseal mta
mtt assay
sealer
title Evaluation of Cytotoxicity of Endoseal MTA Sealer as a Root Canal Perforation Restorative Material on Gingival Fibroblasts Compared to Iranian ProRoot MTA and CEM by MTT test
title_full Evaluation of Cytotoxicity of Endoseal MTA Sealer as a Root Canal Perforation Restorative Material on Gingival Fibroblasts Compared to Iranian ProRoot MTA and CEM by MTT test
title_fullStr Evaluation of Cytotoxicity of Endoseal MTA Sealer as a Root Canal Perforation Restorative Material on Gingival Fibroblasts Compared to Iranian ProRoot MTA and CEM by MTT test
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Cytotoxicity of Endoseal MTA Sealer as a Root Canal Perforation Restorative Material on Gingival Fibroblasts Compared to Iranian ProRoot MTA and CEM by MTT test
title_short Evaluation of Cytotoxicity of Endoseal MTA Sealer as a Root Canal Perforation Restorative Material on Gingival Fibroblasts Compared to Iranian ProRoot MTA and CEM by MTT test
title_sort evaluation of cytotoxicity of endoseal mta sealer as a root canal perforation restorative material on gingival fibroblasts compared to iranian proroot mta and cem by mtt test
topic cem
cytotoxicity
endoseal mta
mtt assay
sealer
url https://jmds.mums.ac.ir/article_21406_4f2fadcc6578b60d13b00b6e2547d1e3.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT salmaomidi evaluationofcytotoxicityofendosealmtasealerasarootcanalperforationrestorativematerialongingivalfibroblastscomparedtoiranianprorootmtaandcembymtttest
AT kosardadgar evaluationofcytotoxicityofendosealmtasealerasarootcanalperforationrestorativematerialongingivalfibroblastscomparedtoiranianprorootmtaandcembymtttest
AT abbasmesgarani evaluationofcytotoxicityofendosealmtasealerasarootcanalperforationrestorativematerialongingivalfibroblastscomparedtoiranianprorootmtaandcembymtttest
AT mahmoudmoosazade evaluationofcytotoxicityofendosealmtasealerasarootcanalperforationrestorativematerialongingivalfibroblastscomparedtoiranianprorootmtaandcembymtttest
AT fatemehzaghihosseinzadeh evaluationofcytotoxicityofendosealmtasealerasarootcanalperforationrestorativematerialongingivalfibroblastscomparedtoiranianprorootmtaandcembymtttest