Cognitive framework for blended mathematical sensemaking in science

Abstract Background Blended mathematical sensemaking in science (“Math-Sci sensemaking”) involves deep conceptual understanding of quantitative relationships describing scientific phenomena and has been studied in various disciplines. However, no unified characterization of blended Math-Sci sensemak...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leonora Kaldaras, Carl Wieman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2023-03-01
Series:International Journal of STEM Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00409-8
_version_ 1827982815470288896
author Leonora Kaldaras
Carl Wieman
author_facet Leonora Kaldaras
Carl Wieman
author_sort Leonora Kaldaras
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Blended mathematical sensemaking in science (“Math-Sci sensemaking”) involves deep conceptual understanding of quantitative relationships describing scientific phenomena and has been studied in various disciplines. However, no unified characterization of blended Math-Sci sensemaking exists. Results We developed a theoretical cognitive model for blended Math-Sci sensemaking grounded in prior work. The model contains three broad levels representing increasingly sophisticated ways of engaging in blended Math-Sci sensemaking: (1) developing qualitative relationships among relevant variables in mathematical equations describing a phenomenon (“qualitative level”); (2) developing mathematical relationships among these variables (“quantitative level”); and (3) explaining how the mathematical operations used in the formula relate to the phenomenon (“conceptual level”). Each level contains three sublevels. We used PhET simulations to design dynamic assessment scenarios in various disciplines to test the model. We used these assessments to interview undergraduate students with a wide range of Math skills. Interview analysis provided validity evidence for the categories and preliminary evidence for the ordering of the categories comprising the cognitive model. It also revealed that students tend to perform at the same level across different disciplinary contexts, suggesting that blended Math-Sci sensemaking is a distinct cognitive construct, independent of specific disciplinary context. Conclusion This paper presents a first-ever published validated cognitive model describing proficiency in blended Math-Sci sensemaking which can guide instruction, curriculum, and assessment development.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T22:39:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-577e8548a61e4884a958cc72e0fb0e87
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2196-7822
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T22:39:16Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series International Journal of STEM Education
spelling doaj.art-577e8548a61e4884a958cc72e0fb0e872023-03-22T12:17:09ZengSpringerOpenInternational Journal of STEM Education2196-78222023-03-0110112510.1186/s40594-023-00409-8Cognitive framework for blended mathematical sensemaking in scienceLeonora Kaldaras0Carl Wieman1Stanford Graduate School of EducationStanford Graduate School of EducationAbstract Background Blended mathematical sensemaking in science (“Math-Sci sensemaking”) involves deep conceptual understanding of quantitative relationships describing scientific phenomena and has been studied in various disciplines. However, no unified characterization of blended Math-Sci sensemaking exists. Results We developed a theoretical cognitive model for blended Math-Sci sensemaking grounded in prior work. The model contains three broad levels representing increasingly sophisticated ways of engaging in blended Math-Sci sensemaking: (1) developing qualitative relationships among relevant variables in mathematical equations describing a phenomenon (“qualitative level”); (2) developing mathematical relationships among these variables (“quantitative level”); and (3) explaining how the mathematical operations used in the formula relate to the phenomenon (“conceptual level”). Each level contains three sublevels. We used PhET simulations to design dynamic assessment scenarios in various disciplines to test the model. We used these assessments to interview undergraduate students with a wide range of Math skills. Interview analysis provided validity evidence for the categories and preliminary evidence for the ordering of the categories comprising the cognitive model. It also revealed that students tend to perform at the same level across different disciplinary contexts, suggesting that blended Math-Sci sensemaking is a distinct cognitive construct, independent of specific disciplinary context. Conclusion This paper presents a first-ever published validated cognitive model describing proficiency in blended Math-Sci sensemaking which can guide instruction, curriculum, and assessment development.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00409-8Cognitive frameworkValidityBlended sensemakingMath sensemakingScience sensemaking
spellingShingle Leonora Kaldaras
Carl Wieman
Cognitive framework for blended mathematical sensemaking in science
International Journal of STEM Education
Cognitive framework
Validity
Blended sensemaking
Math sensemaking
Science sensemaking
title Cognitive framework for blended mathematical sensemaking in science
title_full Cognitive framework for blended mathematical sensemaking in science
title_fullStr Cognitive framework for blended mathematical sensemaking in science
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive framework for blended mathematical sensemaking in science
title_short Cognitive framework for blended mathematical sensemaking in science
title_sort cognitive framework for blended mathematical sensemaking in science
topic Cognitive framework
Validity
Blended sensemaking
Math sensemaking
Science sensemaking
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00409-8
work_keys_str_mv AT leonorakaldaras cognitiveframeworkforblendedmathematicalsensemakinginscience
AT carlwieman cognitiveframeworkforblendedmathematicalsensemakinginscience