-

The present article deals with the emergent factors that have stabilized the historical cost including educational methods, of legal protection, inaccurate generalization of initial book-keeping, protection of syndicates, and non-existence of a complete market. It then proceeds to analyze the critic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: دکتر علی ثقفی
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: University of Tehran 2002-12-01
Series:بررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی
Online Access:https://acctgrev.ut.ac.ir/article_13225_2eac788a8a7e75b00bbe5c00a5d7819b.pdf
Description
Summary:The present article deals with the emergent factors that have stabilized the historical cost including educational methods, of legal protection, inaccurate generalization of initial book-keeping, protection of syndicates, and non-existence of a complete market. It then proceeds to analyze the criticisms leveled at the cost price which cover unreal assumptions, internal inconsistencies of rules, regulations and accords, absence of a physical entity for accounting terms and figures, irrelevancy of accounting information to the decision-making models and negative implications of the historical cost. In another section, the arguments supporting the historical cost such as the assessment of stewardship, historicism and decision-making, have been explained. The research also discusses the adverse effects of the cost price on investors, businesses, accounting professionalism and the institutes in charge of accounting standards accreditation. In conclusion, a new accounting model tailored to the needs of the information age is suggested and the role of each one of the interested groups applying this model is accordingly discussed.
ISSN:2645-8020
2645-8039