Comparison of survival and adverse effect profile in patients with esophageal cancer treated with the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel vs. 5-flourouracil and cisplatin

Objective: Esophageal cancer (EC) is a form of gastrointestinal cancer with the worst malignant potential and poor prognosis. This study sought to compare the survival and adverse effect profile in patients with EC treated with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel or 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and Cisplatin regime...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. Nisar, M. Maqbool Lone, N. Tabassum
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Verduci Editore 2022-09-01
Series:World Cancer Research Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.wcrj.net/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2022/09/e2399.pdf
_version_ 1797980670976327680
author N. Nisar
M. Maqbool Lone
N. Tabassum
author_facet N. Nisar
M. Maqbool Lone
N. Tabassum
author_sort N. Nisar
collection DOAJ
description Objective: Esophageal cancer (EC) is a form of gastrointestinal cancer with the worst malignant potential and poor prognosis. This study sought to compare the survival and adverse effect profile in patients with EC treated with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel or 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and Cisplatin regimen.  Patients and Methods: The study was conducted at the Regional Cancer Centre (RCC), Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS), Soura, Srinagar, J&K, India for a period of 7 months. A total of 251 patients were included in this retrospective study, of which 177 (Group I) had been treated with the combination of Carboplatin and Paclitaxel while 74 patients (Group II) had been treated with 5-FU and Cisplatin combination. Results: The median overall survival (OS) was 20.7 months for patients in Group I and 17.1 months for patients in Group II (HR: 1.200; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], p=0.176). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.26 months for subjects of Group I and 12.33 months for Group II subjects (HR: 0.609; 95% CI; p=0.909). Haematological toxicity (≥ grade III) in terms of anaemia, leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia in Carboplatin and Paclitaxel group (1.7%, 8%, and 18%) was significantly higher than in the 5-FU and Cisplatin group (1.36%, 0%, and 38%) (95% CI; p<0.05). Among non-haematological toxicities, bradycardia was the most notable side-effect of 5-FU and Cisplatin group (18.9%) followed by diarrhoea/vomiting (6.75%) and cough (2.7%). The major side-effect seen in patients treated with the combination of Carboplatin and Paclitaxel was diarrhoea/vomiting (4.52%), followed by mucositis (3.39%) and cough (2.25%) (95% CI; p<0.05). Conclusions: Results suggest that Carboplatin and Paclitaxel regimen is the preferred regimen for patients with potentially curable EC and has higher patient compliance compared to 5-FU and Cisplatin regimen. Toxicity, excluding haematological events, occurred less frequently in the group that received Carboplatin and Paclitaxel compared to toxicity rates in patients who received 5-FU and Cisplatin regimen.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T05:58:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5789e6ab488c442f91a7cdf4dbc6619d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2372-3416
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T05:58:32Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Verduci Editore
record_format Article
series World Cancer Research Journal
spelling doaj.art-5789e6ab488c442f91a7cdf4dbc6619d2022-12-22T04:41:49ZengVerduci EditoreWorld Cancer Research Journal2372-34162022-09-01910.32113/wcrj_20229_23992399Comparison of survival and adverse effect profile in patients with esophageal cancer treated with the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel vs. 5-flourouracil and cisplatinN. Nisar0M. Maqbool Lone1N. Tabassum2Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Kashmir, Hazratbal Srinagar, IndiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, J&K, India, IndiaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Kashmir, Hazratbal Srinagar, IndiaObjective: Esophageal cancer (EC) is a form of gastrointestinal cancer with the worst malignant potential and poor prognosis. This study sought to compare the survival and adverse effect profile in patients with EC treated with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel or 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and Cisplatin regimen.  Patients and Methods: The study was conducted at the Regional Cancer Centre (RCC), Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS), Soura, Srinagar, J&K, India for a period of 7 months. A total of 251 patients were included in this retrospective study, of which 177 (Group I) had been treated with the combination of Carboplatin and Paclitaxel while 74 patients (Group II) had been treated with 5-FU and Cisplatin combination. Results: The median overall survival (OS) was 20.7 months for patients in Group I and 17.1 months for patients in Group II (HR: 1.200; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], p=0.176). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.26 months for subjects of Group I and 12.33 months for Group II subjects (HR: 0.609; 95% CI; p=0.909). Haematological toxicity (≥ grade III) in terms of anaemia, leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia in Carboplatin and Paclitaxel group (1.7%, 8%, and 18%) was significantly higher than in the 5-FU and Cisplatin group (1.36%, 0%, and 38%) (95% CI; p<0.05). Among non-haematological toxicities, bradycardia was the most notable side-effect of 5-FU and Cisplatin group (18.9%) followed by diarrhoea/vomiting (6.75%) and cough (2.7%). The major side-effect seen in patients treated with the combination of Carboplatin and Paclitaxel was diarrhoea/vomiting (4.52%), followed by mucositis (3.39%) and cough (2.25%) (95% CI; p<0.05). Conclusions: Results suggest that Carboplatin and Paclitaxel regimen is the preferred regimen for patients with potentially curable EC and has higher patient compliance compared to 5-FU and Cisplatin regimen. Toxicity, excluding haematological events, occurred less frequently in the group that received Carboplatin and Paclitaxel compared to toxicity rates in patients who received 5-FU and Cisplatin regimen.https://www.wcrj.net/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2022/09/e2399.pdfesophageal cancercarboplatinpaclitaxelcisplatin5-fusurvival
spellingShingle N. Nisar
M. Maqbool Lone
N. Tabassum
Comparison of survival and adverse effect profile in patients with esophageal cancer treated with the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel vs. 5-flourouracil and cisplatin
World Cancer Research Journal
esophageal cancer
carboplatin
paclitaxel
cisplatin
5-fu
survival
title Comparison of survival and adverse effect profile in patients with esophageal cancer treated with the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel vs. 5-flourouracil and cisplatin
title_full Comparison of survival and adverse effect profile in patients with esophageal cancer treated with the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel vs. 5-flourouracil and cisplatin
title_fullStr Comparison of survival and adverse effect profile in patients with esophageal cancer treated with the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel vs. 5-flourouracil and cisplatin
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of survival and adverse effect profile in patients with esophageal cancer treated with the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel vs. 5-flourouracil and cisplatin
title_short Comparison of survival and adverse effect profile in patients with esophageal cancer treated with the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel vs. 5-flourouracil and cisplatin
title_sort comparison of survival and adverse effect profile in patients with esophageal cancer treated with the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel vs 5 flourouracil and cisplatin
topic esophageal cancer
carboplatin
paclitaxel
cisplatin
5-fu
survival
url https://www.wcrj.net/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2022/09/e2399.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nnisar comparisonofsurvivalandadverseeffectprofileinpatientswithesophagealcancertreatedwiththecombinationofcarboplatinandpaclitaxelvs5flourouracilandcisplatin
AT mmaqboollone comparisonofsurvivalandadverseeffectprofileinpatientswithesophagealcancertreatedwiththecombinationofcarboplatinandpaclitaxelvs5flourouracilandcisplatin
AT ntabassum comparisonofsurvivalandadverseeffectprofileinpatientswithesophagealcancertreatedwiththecombinationofcarboplatinandpaclitaxelvs5flourouracilandcisplatin