Optimal cumulative dose of cisplatin for concurrent chemoradiotherapy among patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicenter analysis in Thailand

Abstract Background Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with high cumulative doses (CDs) of cisplatin has been considered the standard of care for non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, given most patients’ inability to tolerate high CDs due to cisplatin-related toxicities, the optimal CD of ci...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nuttapong Ngamphaiboon, Arunee Dechaphunkul, Jiraporn Setakornnukul, Tanadech Dechaphunkul, Rungarun Jiratrachu, Bhoom Suktitipat, Chuleeporn Jiarpinitnun, Poompis Pattaranutaporn, Pongwut Danchaivijitr
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-06-01
Series:BMC Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-020-07024-8
_version_ 1811333698644082688
author Nuttapong Ngamphaiboon
Arunee Dechaphunkul
Jiraporn Setakornnukul
Tanadech Dechaphunkul
Rungarun Jiratrachu
Bhoom Suktitipat
Chuleeporn Jiarpinitnun
Poompis Pattaranutaporn
Pongwut Danchaivijitr
author_facet Nuttapong Ngamphaiboon
Arunee Dechaphunkul
Jiraporn Setakornnukul
Tanadech Dechaphunkul
Rungarun Jiratrachu
Bhoom Suktitipat
Chuleeporn Jiarpinitnun
Poompis Pattaranutaporn
Pongwut Danchaivijitr
author_sort Nuttapong Ngamphaiboon
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with high cumulative doses (CDs) of cisplatin has been considered the standard of care for non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, given most patients’ inability to tolerate high CDs due to cisplatin-related toxicities, the optimal CD of cisplatin during CRT remains undetermined. Methods Patients with non-metastatic NPC who received CRT with cisplatin between 2007 and 2017 were identified through the Thai head and neck cancer multicenter database and then categorized according to cisplatin CD (mg/m2) received. All complications and cisplatin-related toxicities during CRT were recorded. Results We identified 779 non-metastatic NPC patients receiving low (≤150; n = 97), intermediate (151–250; n = 411), and high (> 250; n = 271) CDs of cisplatin. Low CD patients had significantly lower mean actual radiation dose (p < 0.001) and more radiotherapy delay (p = 0.010), while intermediate CD patients had the least hospitalization (p < 0.001). Overall, 39.3% of the patients experienced cisplatin-related toxicity, which was associated with poor overall survival (OS) (p = 0.001). Acute kidney injury was observed in 7% in all patients, which was highest among low CD patients (15.5%; p = 0.002). Intermediate CD patients had significantly longer median OS than the low and high groups (64 vs. 49.8 vs. 53.2, respectively; p = 0.015). Univariate, but not multivariate, analysis showed that CD of cisplatin was significantly associated with OS. Conclusion CD of cisplatin during CRT was not an independent prognostic factor for OS. An intermediate CD induced minimal toxicity without compromising survival and should be considered the optimal CD. Nonetheless, a randomized phase 3 study evaluating the optimal CD of cisplatin is warranted.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T16:56:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-579256eb56944e2c969acb113232ee16
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2407
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T16:56:48Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Cancer
spelling doaj.art-579256eb56944e2c969acb113232ee162022-12-22T02:38:47ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072020-06-0120111010.1186/s12885-020-07024-8Optimal cumulative dose of cisplatin for concurrent chemoradiotherapy among patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicenter analysis in ThailandNuttapong Ngamphaiboon0Arunee Dechaphunkul1Jiraporn Setakornnukul2Tanadech Dechaphunkul3Rungarun Jiratrachu4Bhoom Suktitipat5Chuleeporn Jiarpinitnun6Poompis Pattaranutaporn7Pongwut Danchaivijitr8Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol UniversityDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Songklanagarind Hospital, Prince of Songkla UniversityDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol UniversityDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Songklanagarind Hospital, Prince of Songkla UniversityDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Songklanagarind Hospital, Prince of Songkla UniversityDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol UniversityDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol UniversityDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol UniversityDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol UniversityAbstract Background Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with high cumulative doses (CDs) of cisplatin has been considered the standard of care for non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, given most patients’ inability to tolerate high CDs due to cisplatin-related toxicities, the optimal CD of cisplatin during CRT remains undetermined. Methods Patients with non-metastatic NPC who received CRT with cisplatin between 2007 and 2017 were identified through the Thai head and neck cancer multicenter database and then categorized according to cisplatin CD (mg/m2) received. All complications and cisplatin-related toxicities during CRT were recorded. Results We identified 779 non-metastatic NPC patients receiving low (≤150; n = 97), intermediate (151–250; n = 411), and high (> 250; n = 271) CDs of cisplatin. Low CD patients had significantly lower mean actual radiation dose (p < 0.001) and more radiotherapy delay (p = 0.010), while intermediate CD patients had the least hospitalization (p < 0.001). Overall, 39.3% of the patients experienced cisplatin-related toxicity, which was associated with poor overall survival (OS) (p = 0.001). Acute kidney injury was observed in 7% in all patients, which was highest among low CD patients (15.5%; p = 0.002). Intermediate CD patients had significantly longer median OS than the low and high groups (64 vs. 49.8 vs. 53.2, respectively; p = 0.015). Univariate, but not multivariate, analysis showed that CD of cisplatin was significantly associated with OS. Conclusion CD of cisplatin during CRT was not an independent prognostic factor for OS. An intermediate CD induced minimal toxicity without compromising survival and should be considered the optimal CD. Nonetheless, a randomized phase 3 study evaluating the optimal CD of cisplatin is warranted.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-020-07024-8Nasopharyngeal carcinomaCisplatinChemoradiotherapyCumulative doseNephrotoxicity
spellingShingle Nuttapong Ngamphaiboon
Arunee Dechaphunkul
Jiraporn Setakornnukul
Tanadech Dechaphunkul
Rungarun Jiratrachu
Bhoom Suktitipat
Chuleeporn Jiarpinitnun
Poompis Pattaranutaporn
Pongwut Danchaivijitr
Optimal cumulative dose of cisplatin for concurrent chemoradiotherapy among patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicenter analysis in Thailand
BMC Cancer
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Cisplatin
Chemoradiotherapy
Cumulative dose
Nephrotoxicity
title Optimal cumulative dose of cisplatin for concurrent chemoradiotherapy among patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicenter analysis in Thailand
title_full Optimal cumulative dose of cisplatin for concurrent chemoradiotherapy among patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicenter analysis in Thailand
title_fullStr Optimal cumulative dose of cisplatin for concurrent chemoradiotherapy among patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicenter analysis in Thailand
title_full_unstemmed Optimal cumulative dose of cisplatin for concurrent chemoradiotherapy among patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicenter analysis in Thailand
title_short Optimal cumulative dose of cisplatin for concurrent chemoradiotherapy among patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicenter analysis in Thailand
title_sort optimal cumulative dose of cisplatin for concurrent chemoradiotherapy among patients with non metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma a multicenter analysis in thailand
topic Nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Cisplatin
Chemoradiotherapy
Cumulative dose
Nephrotoxicity
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-020-07024-8
work_keys_str_mv AT nuttapongngamphaiboon optimalcumulativedoseofcisplatinforconcurrentchemoradiotherapyamongpatientswithnonmetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaamulticenteranalysisinthailand
AT aruneedechaphunkul optimalcumulativedoseofcisplatinforconcurrentchemoradiotherapyamongpatientswithnonmetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaamulticenteranalysisinthailand
AT jirapornsetakornnukul optimalcumulativedoseofcisplatinforconcurrentchemoradiotherapyamongpatientswithnonmetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaamulticenteranalysisinthailand
AT tanadechdechaphunkul optimalcumulativedoseofcisplatinforconcurrentchemoradiotherapyamongpatientswithnonmetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaamulticenteranalysisinthailand
AT rungarunjiratrachu optimalcumulativedoseofcisplatinforconcurrentchemoradiotherapyamongpatientswithnonmetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaamulticenteranalysisinthailand
AT bhoomsuktitipat optimalcumulativedoseofcisplatinforconcurrentchemoradiotherapyamongpatientswithnonmetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaamulticenteranalysisinthailand
AT chuleepornjiarpinitnun optimalcumulativedoseofcisplatinforconcurrentchemoradiotherapyamongpatientswithnonmetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaamulticenteranalysisinthailand
AT poompispattaranutaporn optimalcumulativedoseofcisplatinforconcurrentchemoradiotherapyamongpatientswithnonmetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaamulticenteranalysisinthailand
AT pongwutdanchaivijitr optimalcumulativedoseofcisplatinforconcurrentchemoradiotherapyamongpatientswithnonmetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaamulticenteranalysisinthailand