Evaluation of the IAGOS-Core GHG package H<sub>2</sub>O measurements during the DENCHAR airborne inter-comparison campaign in 2011

<p>As part of the DENCHAR (Development and Evaluation of Novel Compact Hygrometer for Airborne Research) inter-comparison campaign in northern Germany in 2011, a commercial cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) based gas analyzer (G2401-m, Picarro Inc., US) was installed on a Learjet to meas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. Filges, C. Gerbig, C. W. Rella, J. Hoffnagle, H. Smit, M. Krämer, N. Spelten, C. Rolf, Z. Bozóki, B. Buchholz, V. Ebert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2018-09-01
Series:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Online Access:https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/11/5279/2018/amt-11-5279-2018.pdf
_version_ 1817998967162535936
author A. Filges
C. Gerbig
C. W. Rella
J. Hoffnagle
H. Smit
M. Krämer
N. Spelten
C. Rolf
Z. Bozóki
B. Buchholz
V. Ebert
author_facet A. Filges
C. Gerbig
C. W. Rella
J. Hoffnagle
H. Smit
M. Krämer
N. Spelten
C. Rolf
Z. Bozóki
B. Buchholz
V. Ebert
author_sort A. Filges
collection DOAJ
description <p>As part of the DENCHAR (Development and Evaluation of Novel Compact Hygrometer for Airborne Research) inter-comparison campaign in northern Germany in 2011, a commercial cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) based gas analyzer (G2401-m, Picarro Inc., US) was installed on a Learjet to measure atmospheric water vapor, CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, and CO. The CRDS components were identical to those chosen for integration aboard commercial airliners within the IAGOS (In-service Aircraft for a Global Observing System) project. Since the quantitative capabilities of the CRDS water vapor measurements were never evaluated and reviewed in detail in a publication before, the campaign allowed for an initial assessment of the long-term IAGOS water vapor measurements by CRDS against reference instruments with a long performance record (Fast In-situ Stratospheric Hygrometer (FISH) and CR-2 frost point hygrometer (Buck Research Instruments L.L.C., US), both operated by Research Centre Jülich).</p><p>For the initial water calibration of the instrument it was compared against a dew point mirror (Dewmet TDH, Michell Instruments Ltd., UK) in the range from 70&thinsp;000 to 25&thinsp;000&thinsp;ppm water vapor mole fraction. During the inter-comparison campaign the analyzer was compared on the ground over the range from 2 to 600&thinsp;ppm against the dew point hygrometer used for calibration of the FISH reference instrument. A new, independent calibration method based on the dilution effect of water vapor on CO<sub>2</sub> was evaluated.</p><p>Comparison of the in-flight data against the reference instruments showed that the analyzer is reliable and has a good long-term stability. The flight data suggest a conservative precision estimate for measurements made at 0.4&thinsp;Hz (2.5&thinsp;s measurement interval) of 4&thinsp;ppm for H<sub>2</sub>O&thinsp;&lt;&thinsp;10&thinsp;ppm, 20&thinsp;% or 10&thinsp;ppm (whichever is smaller) for 10&thinsp;ppm&thinsp;&lt;&thinsp;H<sub>2</sub>O&thinsp;&lt;&thinsp;100&thinsp;ppm, and 5&thinsp;% or 30&thinsp;ppm (whichever is smaller) for H<sub>2</sub>O&thinsp;&gt;&thinsp;100&thinsp;ppm. Accuracy of the CRDS instrument was estimated, based on laboratory calibrations, as 1&thinsp;% for the water vapor range from 25&thinsp;000&thinsp;ppm down to 7000&thinsp;ppm, increasing to 5&thinsp;% at 50&thinsp;ppm water vapor. Accuracy at water vapor mole fractions below 50&thinsp;ppm was difficult to assess, as the reference systems suffered from lack of data availability.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-14T03:01:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-579b8636d55b47e2ac19430d6f59c307
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1867-1381
1867-8548
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T03:01:27Z
publishDate 2018-09-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
spelling doaj.art-579b8636d55b47e2ac19430d6f59c3072022-12-22T02:15:53ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Measurement Techniques1867-13811867-85482018-09-01115279529710.5194/amt-11-5279-2018Evaluation of the IAGOS-Core GHG package H<sub>2</sub>O measurements during the DENCHAR airborne inter-comparison campaign in 2011A. Filges0C. Gerbig1C. W. Rella2J. Hoffnagle3H. Smit4M. Krämer5N. Spelten6C. Rolf7Z. Bozóki8B. Buchholz9V. Ebert10Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (MPI-BGC), 07747 Jena, GermanyMax Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (MPI-BGC), 07747 Jena, GermanyPicarro, Inc., Santa Clara, CA 95054, USAPicarro, Inc., Santa Clara, CA 95054, USAResearch Centre Jülich, Institute for Energy and Climate Research Troposphere (IEK-8), 52428 Jülich, GermanyResearch Centre Jülich, Institute for Energy and Climate Research Stratosphere (IEK-7), 52428 Jülich, GermanyResearch Centre Jülich, Institute for Energy and Climate Research Stratosphere (IEK-7), 52428 Jülich, GermanyResearch Centre Jülich, Institute for Energy and Climate Research Stratosphere (IEK-7), 52428 Jülich, GermanyHungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA) and University of Szeged (SZTE) Research Group on Photoacoustic Spectroscopy, Szeged, 6720, HungaryPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), 38116 Braunschweig, GermanyPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), 38116 Braunschweig, Germany<p>As part of the DENCHAR (Development and Evaluation of Novel Compact Hygrometer for Airborne Research) inter-comparison campaign in northern Germany in 2011, a commercial cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) based gas analyzer (G2401-m, Picarro Inc., US) was installed on a Learjet to measure atmospheric water vapor, CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, and CO. The CRDS components were identical to those chosen for integration aboard commercial airliners within the IAGOS (In-service Aircraft for a Global Observing System) project. Since the quantitative capabilities of the CRDS water vapor measurements were never evaluated and reviewed in detail in a publication before, the campaign allowed for an initial assessment of the long-term IAGOS water vapor measurements by CRDS against reference instruments with a long performance record (Fast In-situ Stratospheric Hygrometer (FISH) and CR-2 frost point hygrometer (Buck Research Instruments L.L.C., US), both operated by Research Centre Jülich).</p><p>For the initial water calibration of the instrument it was compared against a dew point mirror (Dewmet TDH, Michell Instruments Ltd., UK) in the range from 70&thinsp;000 to 25&thinsp;000&thinsp;ppm water vapor mole fraction. During the inter-comparison campaign the analyzer was compared on the ground over the range from 2 to 600&thinsp;ppm against the dew point hygrometer used for calibration of the FISH reference instrument. A new, independent calibration method based on the dilution effect of water vapor on CO<sub>2</sub> was evaluated.</p><p>Comparison of the in-flight data against the reference instruments showed that the analyzer is reliable and has a good long-term stability. The flight data suggest a conservative precision estimate for measurements made at 0.4&thinsp;Hz (2.5&thinsp;s measurement interval) of 4&thinsp;ppm for H<sub>2</sub>O&thinsp;&lt;&thinsp;10&thinsp;ppm, 20&thinsp;% or 10&thinsp;ppm (whichever is smaller) for 10&thinsp;ppm&thinsp;&lt;&thinsp;H<sub>2</sub>O&thinsp;&lt;&thinsp;100&thinsp;ppm, and 5&thinsp;% or 30&thinsp;ppm (whichever is smaller) for H<sub>2</sub>O&thinsp;&gt;&thinsp;100&thinsp;ppm. Accuracy of the CRDS instrument was estimated, based on laboratory calibrations, as 1&thinsp;% for the water vapor range from 25&thinsp;000&thinsp;ppm down to 7000&thinsp;ppm, increasing to 5&thinsp;% at 50&thinsp;ppm water vapor. Accuracy at water vapor mole fractions below 50&thinsp;ppm was difficult to assess, as the reference systems suffered from lack of data availability.</p>https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/11/5279/2018/amt-11-5279-2018.pdf
spellingShingle A. Filges
C. Gerbig
C. W. Rella
J. Hoffnagle
H. Smit
M. Krämer
N. Spelten
C. Rolf
Z. Bozóki
B. Buchholz
V. Ebert
Evaluation of the IAGOS-Core GHG package H<sub>2</sub>O measurements during the DENCHAR airborne inter-comparison campaign in 2011
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
title Evaluation of the IAGOS-Core GHG package H<sub>2</sub>O measurements during the DENCHAR airborne inter-comparison campaign in 2011
title_full Evaluation of the IAGOS-Core GHG package H<sub>2</sub>O measurements during the DENCHAR airborne inter-comparison campaign in 2011
title_fullStr Evaluation of the IAGOS-Core GHG package H<sub>2</sub>O measurements during the DENCHAR airborne inter-comparison campaign in 2011
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the IAGOS-Core GHG package H<sub>2</sub>O measurements during the DENCHAR airborne inter-comparison campaign in 2011
title_short Evaluation of the IAGOS-Core GHG package H<sub>2</sub>O measurements during the DENCHAR airborne inter-comparison campaign in 2011
title_sort evaluation of the iagos core ghg package h sub 2 sub o measurements during the denchar airborne inter comparison campaign in 2011
url https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/11/5279/2018/amt-11-5279-2018.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT afilges evaluationoftheiagoscoreghgpackagehsub2subomeasurementsduringthedencharairborneintercomparisoncampaignin2011
AT cgerbig evaluationoftheiagoscoreghgpackagehsub2subomeasurementsduringthedencharairborneintercomparisoncampaignin2011
AT cwrella evaluationoftheiagoscoreghgpackagehsub2subomeasurementsduringthedencharairborneintercomparisoncampaignin2011
AT jhoffnagle evaluationoftheiagoscoreghgpackagehsub2subomeasurementsduringthedencharairborneintercomparisoncampaignin2011
AT hsmit evaluationoftheiagoscoreghgpackagehsub2subomeasurementsduringthedencharairborneintercomparisoncampaignin2011
AT mkramer evaluationoftheiagoscoreghgpackagehsub2subomeasurementsduringthedencharairborneintercomparisoncampaignin2011
AT nspelten evaluationoftheiagoscoreghgpackagehsub2subomeasurementsduringthedencharairborneintercomparisoncampaignin2011
AT crolf evaluationoftheiagoscoreghgpackagehsub2subomeasurementsduringthedencharairborneintercomparisoncampaignin2011
AT zbozoki evaluationoftheiagoscoreghgpackagehsub2subomeasurementsduringthedencharairborneintercomparisoncampaignin2011
AT bbuchholz evaluationoftheiagoscoreghgpackagehsub2subomeasurementsduringthedencharairborneintercomparisoncampaignin2011
AT vebert evaluationoftheiagoscoreghgpackagehsub2subomeasurementsduringthedencharairborneintercomparisoncampaignin2011