Crop and Tillage Effects on Water Productivity of Dryland Agriculture in Argentina

Rising demands for food and uncertainties about climate change call for a paradigm shift in water management with a stronger focus on rainfed agriculture. The objective here was to estimate water productivity of different crops under no-till (NT) and conventional till (CT), in order to identify rota...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elke Noellemeyer, Romina Fernández, Alberto Quiroga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2013-01-01
Series:Agriculture
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/3/1/1
_version_ 1818732801380319232
author Elke Noellemeyer
Romina Fernández
Alberto Quiroga
author_facet Elke Noellemeyer
Romina Fernández
Alberto Quiroga
author_sort Elke Noellemeyer
collection DOAJ
description Rising demands for food and uncertainties about climate change call for a paradigm shift in water management with a stronger focus on rainfed agriculture. The objective here was to estimate water productivity of different crops under no-till (NT) and conventional till (CT), in order to identify rotations that improve the water productivity of dryland agriculture. We hypothesized that NT and cereal crops would have a positive effect on overall water productivity. Crop yield and water use data were obtained from a 15 year experiment (1993 to 2008) on an entic Haplustoll in the semiarid Pampa, Argentina, with a rotation of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), corn (Zea mays L.), sunflower (Helianthus annus), and soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). The results indicated an improved water productivity of all crops under NT compared with that of CT; however, the response of cereals (corn +1.0 kg ha−1 mm−1, wheat +1.3 kg ha−1 mm−1) was higher than that of sunflower (+0.3 kg ha−1 mm−1) and soybean (+0.5 kg ha−1 mm−1). Crop type had a higher impact on water productivity than did tillage system. In agreement with our hypothesis, cereal crops were more efficient (corn 9.8 and wheat 6.9 kg ha−1 mm−1) compared with soybean 2.4 and sunflower 3.9 kg mm−1, but the economic water productivity of sunflower (0.9 US$ ha−1 mm−1) almost equaled that of wheat (1.1 US$ ha−1mm−1) and corn (1.2 US$ ha−1 mm−1). We concluded that the use of the synergy between NT and water efficient crops could be a promising step towards improving food production in semiarid regions.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T23:39:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-57a07a9a26964954ab74ee2b652a567c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0472
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T23:39:21Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Agriculture
spelling doaj.art-57a07a9a26964954ab74ee2b652a567c2022-12-21T21:28:29ZengMDPI AGAgriculture2077-04722013-01-013111110.3390/agriculture3010001Crop and Tillage Effects on Water Productivity of Dryland Agriculture in ArgentinaElke NoellemeyerRomina FernándezAlberto QuirogaRising demands for food and uncertainties about climate change call for a paradigm shift in water management with a stronger focus on rainfed agriculture. The objective here was to estimate water productivity of different crops under no-till (NT) and conventional till (CT), in order to identify rotations that improve the water productivity of dryland agriculture. We hypothesized that NT and cereal crops would have a positive effect on overall water productivity. Crop yield and water use data were obtained from a 15 year experiment (1993 to 2008) on an entic Haplustoll in the semiarid Pampa, Argentina, with a rotation of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), corn (Zea mays L.), sunflower (Helianthus annus), and soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). The results indicated an improved water productivity of all crops under NT compared with that of CT; however, the response of cereals (corn +1.0 kg ha−1 mm−1, wheat +1.3 kg ha−1 mm−1) was higher than that of sunflower (+0.3 kg ha−1 mm−1) and soybean (+0.5 kg ha−1 mm−1). Crop type had a higher impact on water productivity than did tillage system. In agreement with our hypothesis, cereal crops were more efficient (corn 9.8 and wheat 6.9 kg ha−1 mm−1) compared with soybean 2.4 and sunflower 3.9 kg mm−1, but the economic water productivity of sunflower (0.9 US$ ha−1 mm−1) almost equaled that of wheat (1.1 US$ ha−1mm−1) and corn (1.2 US$ ha−1 mm−1). We concluded that the use of the synergy between NT and water efficient crops could be a promising step towards improving food production in semiarid regions.http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/3/1/1water productivitycerealsoilseedstrade priceenergy contents
spellingShingle Elke Noellemeyer
Romina Fernández
Alberto Quiroga
Crop and Tillage Effects on Water Productivity of Dryland Agriculture in Argentina
Agriculture
water productivity
cereals
oilseeds
trade price
energy contents
title Crop and Tillage Effects on Water Productivity of Dryland Agriculture in Argentina
title_full Crop and Tillage Effects on Water Productivity of Dryland Agriculture in Argentina
title_fullStr Crop and Tillage Effects on Water Productivity of Dryland Agriculture in Argentina
title_full_unstemmed Crop and Tillage Effects on Water Productivity of Dryland Agriculture in Argentina
title_short Crop and Tillage Effects on Water Productivity of Dryland Agriculture in Argentina
title_sort crop and tillage effects on water productivity of dryland agriculture in argentina
topic water productivity
cereals
oilseeds
trade price
energy contents
url http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/3/1/1
work_keys_str_mv AT elkenoellemeyer cropandtillageeffectsonwaterproductivityofdrylandagricultureinargentina
AT rominafernandez cropandtillageeffectsonwaterproductivityofdrylandagricultureinargentina
AT albertoquiroga cropandtillageeffectsonwaterproductivityofdrylandagricultureinargentina