Pathology after neoadjuvant treatment – How to assess residual disease

While systemic therapy for non-metastatic, invasive breast cancer is provided to minimize the risk of recurrence, neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is given prior to surgery to downstage the tumor and to evaluate treatment response. Downstaging the tumor may allow for less invasive surgery on the breast and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giuseppe Viale, Nicola Fusco
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-03-01
Series:Breast
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977621009905
_version_ 1817988716980862976
author Giuseppe Viale
Nicola Fusco
author_facet Giuseppe Viale
Nicola Fusco
author_sort Giuseppe Viale
collection DOAJ
description While systemic therapy for non-metastatic, invasive breast cancer is provided to minimize the risk of recurrence, neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is given prior to surgery to downstage the tumor and to evaluate treatment response. Downstaging the tumor may allow for less invasive surgery on the breast and axilla, thus avoiding the need for breast reconstruction, improving cosmetic outcomes, and reducing postoperative complications. With the rising number of NAT candidates, it is becoming increasingly important to standardize how tumor response is assessed after surgery. In the post-NAT setting, macroscopic assessment of surgical samples, extent of sampling for histology, and microscopic analysis require a different approach than in the primary surgery setting. In the neo-adjuvant setting, the close collaboration of pathologists, oncologists, surgeons, and radiologists within the multidisciplinary team is essential to ensure the best possible management of breast cancer patients. Here, we provide an update on the suggested procedures for an accurate assessment of tumor response to NAT, including the evaluation of all relevant parameters that correlate with long-term prognosis and inform the subsequent adjuvant interventions.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T00:37:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-57a1a50560514daf9450418d5f2ccfba
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1532-3080
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T00:37:41Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Breast
spelling doaj.art-57a1a50560514daf9450418d5f2ccfba2022-12-22T02:22:17ZengElsevierBreast1532-30802022-03-0162S25S28Pathology after neoadjuvant treatment – How to assess residual diseaseGiuseppe Viale0Nicola Fusco1Corresponding author. European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, University of Milan, Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 437, 20141, Milan, Italy.; Department of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, ItalyDepartment of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, ItalyWhile systemic therapy for non-metastatic, invasive breast cancer is provided to minimize the risk of recurrence, neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is given prior to surgery to downstage the tumor and to evaluate treatment response. Downstaging the tumor may allow for less invasive surgery on the breast and axilla, thus avoiding the need for breast reconstruction, improving cosmetic outcomes, and reducing postoperative complications. With the rising number of NAT candidates, it is becoming increasingly important to standardize how tumor response is assessed after surgery. In the post-NAT setting, macroscopic assessment of surgical samples, extent of sampling for histology, and microscopic analysis require a different approach than in the primary surgery setting. In the neo-adjuvant setting, the close collaboration of pathologists, oncologists, surgeons, and radiologists within the multidisciplinary team is essential to ensure the best possible management of breast cancer patients. Here, we provide an update on the suggested procedures for an accurate assessment of tumor response to NAT, including the evaluation of all relevant parameters that correlate with long-term prognosis and inform the subsequent adjuvant interventions.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977621009905Breast cancerNeoadjuvant therapyBiomarkersPathologic complete response
spellingShingle Giuseppe Viale
Nicola Fusco
Pathology after neoadjuvant treatment – How to assess residual disease
Breast
Breast cancer
Neoadjuvant therapy
Biomarkers
Pathologic complete response
title Pathology after neoadjuvant treatment – How to assess residual disease
title_full Pathology after neoadjuvant treatment – How to assess residual disease
title_fullStr Pathology after neoadjuvant treatment – How to assess residual disease
title_full_unstemmed Pathology after neoadjuvant treatment – How to assess residual disease
title_short Pathology after neoadjuvant treatment – How to assess residual disease
title_sort pathology after neoadjuvant treatment how to assess residual disease
topic Breast cancer
Neoadjuvant therapy
Biomarkers
Pathologic complete response
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977621009905
work_keys_str_mv AT giuseppeviale pathologyafterneoadjuvanttreatmenthowtoassessresidualdisease
AT nicolafusco pathologyafterneoadjuvanttreatmenthowtoassessresidualdisease