Selecting a Biomass Pelleting Processing Depot Using a Data Driven Decision-Making Approach

Bioenergy is one of the potential solutions to satisfy the extensive demand for energy and reduce fossil fuel dependency. For biomass to be an efficient source of bioenergy, it must be converted to a usable form, one of which is pellets. This study compares three commonly used methods to produce pel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Siham Tazzit, Niamat Ullah Ibne Hossain, Farjana Nur, Fatine Elakramine, Raed Jaradat, Safae El Amrani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-05-01
Series:Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/9/2/32
_version_ 1797535074448572416
author Siham Tazzit
Niamat Ullah Ibne Hossain
Farjana Nur
Fatine Elakramine
Raed Jaradat
Safae El Amrani
author_facet Siham Tazzit
Niamat Ullah Ibne Hossain
Farjana Nur
Fatine Elakramine
Raed Jaradat
Safae El Amrani
author_sort Siham Tazzit
collection DOAJ
description Bioenergy is one of the potential solutions to satisfy the extensive demand for energy and reduce fossil fuel dependency. For biomass to be an efficient source of bioenergy, it must be converted to a usable form, one of which is pellets. This study compares three commonly used methods to produce pellets in a biomass depot and presents a framework to select the most effective and economic pelleting processes. The comparison is performed using a data driven decision-making method called the Preference Index Selection Method (PSI). We considered three main pelletization technologies and compared four of their most critical attributes. The three popular biomass pellet processing methods used for this study are the conventional pelleting process (CPP), the high moisture pelleting process (HMPP), and the ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX). These processes were evaluated from both economic and environmental perspectives. We used the state of Mississippi as a testing ground for our analyses. The results obtained through the PSI method were validated with the Grey relational analysis (GRA) method. The results revealed that of the three available pelleting processes, the conventional pelleting process and the high moisture pelleting process were the most economic and environmentally friendly.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T11:39:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-57a28685c403420e8941f683290d3482
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-8954
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T11:39:49Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Systems
spelling doaj.art-57a28685c403420e8941f683290d34822023-11-21T18:35:12ZengMDPI AGSystems2079-89542021-05-01923210.3390/systems9020032Selecting a Biomass Pelleting Processing Depot Using a Data Driven Decision-Making ApproachSiham Tazzit0Niamat Ullah Ibne Hossain1Farjana Nur2Fatine Elakramine3Raed Jaradat4Safae El Amrani5Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Bagley College of Engineering, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USADepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Bagley College of Engineering, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USADepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Bagley College of Engineering, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USADepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Bagley College of Engineering, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USADepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Bagley College of Engineering, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USADepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Bagley College of Engineering, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USABioenergy is one of the potential solutions to satisfy the extensive demand for energy and reduce fossil fuel dependency. For biomass to be an efficient source of bioenergy, it must be converted to a usable form, one of which is pellets. This study compares three commonly used methods to produce pellets in a biomass depot and presents a framework to select the most effective and economic pelleting processes. The comparison is performed using a data driven decision-making method called the Preference Index Selection Method (PSI). We considered three main pelletization technologies and compared four of their most critical attributes. The three popular biomass pellet processing methods used for this study are the conventional pelleting process (CPP), the high moisture pelleting process (HMPP), and the ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX). These processes were evaluated from both economic and environmental perspectives. We used the state of Mississippi as a testing ground for our analyses. The results obtained through the PSI method were validated with the Grey relational analysis (GRA) method. The results revealed that of the three available pelleting processes, the conventional pelleting process and the high moisture pelleting process were the most economic and environmentally friendly.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/9/2/32biomasspelleting processpreference selection indexgrey relational analysismulti-criteria decision making
spellingShingle Siham Tazzit
Niamat Ullah Ibne Hossain
Farjana Nur
Fatine Elakramine
Raed Jaradat
Safae El Amrani
Selecting a Biomass Pelleting Processing Depot Using a Data Driven Decision-Making Approach
Systems
biomass
pelleting process
preference selection index
grey relational analysis
multi-criteria decision making
title Selecting a Biomass Pelleting Processing Depot Using a Data Driven Decision-Making Approach
title_full Selecting a Biomass Pelleting Processing Depot Using a Data Driven Decision-Making Approach
title_fullStr Selecting a Biomass Pelleting Processing Depot Using a Data Driven Decision-Making Approach
title_full_unstemmed Selecting a Biomass Pelleting Processing Depot Using a Data Driven Decision-Making Approach
title_short Selecting a Biomass Pelleting Processing Depot Using a Data Driven Decision-Making Approach
title_sort selecting a biomass pelleting processing depot using a data driven decision making approach
topic biomass
pelleting process
preference selection index
grey relational analysis
multi-criteria decision making
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/9/2/32
work_keys_str_mv AT sihamtazzit selectingabiomasspelletingprocessingdepotusingadatadrivendecisionmakingapproach
AT niamatullahibnehossain selectingabiomasspelletingprocessingdepotusingadatadrivendecisionmakingapproach
AT farjananur selectingabiomasspelletingprocessingdepotusingadatadrivendecisionmakingapproach
AT fatineelakramine selectingabiomasspelletingprocessingdepotusingadatadrivendecisionmakingapproach
AT raedjaradat selectingabiomasspelletingprocessingdepotusingadatadrivendecisionmakingapproach
AT safaeelamrani selectingabiomasspelletingprocessingdepotusingadatadrivendecisionmakingapproach