Argumentative interactions between Brazilian Supreme Court and other courts
<p>This paper examines the argumentative interactions between the Brazilian Supreme Court (Supremo Tribunal Federal - STF) and other courts in order to clarify how the STF uses other court’s rulings. Using an analytical framework, the authors sought to identify whether the STF’s Justices build...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito
2015-01-01
|
Series: | Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.reedpesquisa.org/ojs-2.4.3/index.php/reed/article/view/59 |
_version_ | 1828423275439456256 |
---|---|
author | Luciana de Oliveira Ramos Aline Oliveira de Santana Marco Antonio Loschiavo Leme de Barros |
author_facet | Luciana de Oliveira Ramos Aline Oliveira de Santana Marco Antonio Loschiavo Leme de Barros |
author_sort | Luciana de Oliveira Ramos |
collection | DOAJ |
description | <p>This paper examines the argumentative interactions between the Brazilian Supreme Court (Supremo Tribunal Federal - STF) and other courts in order to clarify how the STF uses other court’s rulings. Using an analytical framework, the authors sought to identify whether the STF’s Justices build their reasoning based on arguments mentioned by other courts’ rulings, including foreign and transnational ones. Qualitative analysis revealed weak interactions between the STF and other courts since in most cases Brazilian Supreme Court’s Justices merely mention prior rulings, without necessarily discussing the reasoning of other courts’ decisions in order to use them as part of its own reasoning. Among the eleven cases analyzed, only in four cases we found some influence of the rulings mentioned in the definition of the legal issue and in the judicial response.</p> |
first_indexed | 2024-12-10T15:58:50Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-57a4bf67b006435a9017d673077d7a77 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2319-0817 2319-0817 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-10T15:58:50Z |
publishDate | 2015-01-01 |
publisher | Rede de Pesquisa Empírica em Direito |
record_format | Article |
series | Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies |
spelling | doaj.art-57a4bf67b006435a9017d673077d7a772022-12-22T01:42:31ZengRede de Pesquisa Empírica em DireitoBrazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies2319-08172319-08172015-01-012110.19092/reed.v2i1.5955Argumentative interactions between Brazilian Supreme Court and other courtsLuciana de Oliveira RamosAline Oliveira de SantanaMarco Antonio Loschiavo Leme de Barros<p>This paper examines the argumentative interactions between the Brazilian Supreme Court (Supremo Tribunal Federal - STF) and other courts in order to clarify how the STF uses other court’s rulings. Using an analytical framework, the authors sought to identify whether the STF’s Justices build their reasoning based on arguments mentioned by other courts’ rulings, including foreign and transnational ones. Qualitative analysis revealed weak interactions between the STF and other courts since in most cases Brazilian Supreme Court’s Justices merely mention prior rulings, without necessarily discussing the reasoning of other courts’ decisions in order to use them as part of its own reasoning. Among the eleven cases analyzed, only in four cases we found some influence of the rulings mentioned in the definition of the legal issue and in the judicial response.</p>http://www.reedpesquisa.org/ojs-2.4.3/index.php/reed/article/view/59Supremo Tribunal Federalargumentação jurídicaprecedentes judiciaistribunais constitucionaisinteração argumentativa |
spellingShingle | Luciana de Oliveira Ramos Aline Oliveira de Santana Marco Antonio Loschiavo Leme de Barros Argumentative interactions between Brazilian Supreme Court and other courts Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies Supremo Tribunal Federal argumentação jurídica precedentes judiciais tribunais constitucionais interação argumentativa |
title | Argumentative interactions between Brazilian Supreme Court and other courts |
title_full | Argumentative interactions between Brazilian Supreme Court and other courts |
title_fullStr | Argumentative interactions between Brazilian Supreme Court and other courts |
title_full_unstemmed | Argumentative interactions between Brazilian Supreme Court and other courts |
title_short | Argumentative interactions between Brazilian Supreme Court and other courts |
title_sort | argumentative interactions between brazilian supreme court and other courts |
topic | Supremo Tribunal Federal argumentação jurídica precedentes judiciais tribunais constitucionais interação argumentativa |
url | http://www.reedpesquisa.org/ojs-2.4.3/index.php/reed/article/view/59 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lucianadeoliveiraramos argumentativeinteractionsbetweenbraziliansupremecourtandothercourts AT alineoliveiradesantana argumentativeinteractionsbetweenbraziliansupremecourtandothercourts AT marcoantonioloschiavolemedebarros argumentativeinteractionsbetweenbraziliansupremecourtandothercourts |