Validation of nasal tracheal aspiration in children with lung disease

Abstract Background Nasal tracheal aspiration (NTA) is a frequently used diagnostic method to assess of infections in the lower airways. However, the validity of the method has not previously been compared to bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in non-intubated children with a lung disease. We hypothesised...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Louise Østergaard Andersen, Hanne Vebert Olesen, Anne Helene Spannow, Sune Leisgaard Mørck Rubak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-05-01
Series:BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-01992-2
_version_ 1818238724553572352
author Louise Østergaard Andersen
Hanne Vebert Olesen
Anne Helene Spannow
Sune Leisgaard Mørck Rubak
author_facet Louise Østergaard Andersen
Hanne Vebert Olesen
Anne Helene Spannow
Sune Leisgaard Mørck Rubak
author_sort Louise Østergaard Andersen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Nasal tracheal aspiration (NTA) is a frequently used diagnostic method to assess of infections in the lower airways. However, the validity of the method has not previously been compared to bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in non-intubated children with a lung disease. We hypothesised that NTA performed by health professionals using the nares vocal cord distance to be placed at the entrance of the trachea, will result in same finding of bacteria in the lower airways as the gold standard of BAL. Methods In a prospective study, 173 paired samples of NTA and BAL were obtained between June 2016 to August 2018. Samples were collected from all patients undergoing bronchoscopy with spontaneous breathing during general anaesthesia. This study compares the microbiological results from the cultures obtained by investigating complete concordance i.e. identical pathogenic bacteria and coherence i.e. absence or presence of pathogenic bacteria growth between NTA and BAL. Results Samples were collected in 164 patients, 158 children between 21 days and 18 years of age and six young adults still treated at the paediatric department. The overall similarity (complete agreement) was found in 49% [41–56], sensitivity was 35% [27–45], specificity was 66% [55–76], positive predictive value was 36% [27–46] and negative predictive value was 64% [54–64] concerning complete pathogenic bacteria concordance. If we only considered coherence growth of pathogenic bacteria, similarity was 71% [63–79], sensitivity was 74% [64–81], specificity was 66% [55–76], positive predictive value was 75% [65–82] and negative predictive value was 65% [54–75]. Patients with cystic fibrosis showed a similarity of 88% [73–95], a sensitivity of 92% [76–99], a specificity of 71% [36–95], a positive predictive value of 92% [76–99] and a negative predictive value of 71% [36–95] concerning coherence growth of pathogenic bacteria. Conclusion The study indicates that NTA compared to BAL as the gold standard is not clinically useful to assess positive findings of specific bacteria in the lower airway tract. Statistically significantly increased sensitivity and positive predictive value were found in cystic fibrosis patients concerning coherence growth. The clinical usage of NTA remains important as negative findings are of clinical value. However, BAL continues to be preferred as a significantly superior diagnostic tool.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T12:46:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-57b2edefc05d4883b906338c36a94bb6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2466
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T12:46:12Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pulmonary Medicine
spelling doaj.art-57b2edefc05d4883b906338c36a94bb62022-12-22T00:24:07ZengBMCBMC Pulmonary Medicine1471-24662022-05-0122111210.1186/s12890-022-01992-2Validation of nasal tracheal aspiration in children with lung diseaseLouise Østergaard Andersen0Hanne Vebert Olesen1Anne Helene Spannow2Sune Leisgaard Mørck Rubak3Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Center of Paediatric Pulmonology and Allergology, Aarhus University Hospital, SkejbyDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Center of Paediatric Pulmonology and Allergology, Aarhus University Hospital, SkejbyDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Center of Paediatric Pulmonology and Allergology, Aarhus University Hospital, SkejbyDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Center of Paediatric Pulmonology and Allergology, Aarhus University Hospital, SkejbyAbstract Background Nasal tracheal aspiration (NTA) is a frequently used diagnostic method to assess of infections in the lower airways. However, the validity of the method has not previously been compared to bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in non-intubated children with a lung disease. We hypothesised that NTA performed by health professionals using the nares vocal cord distance to be placed at the entrance of the trachea, will result in same finding of bacteria in the lower airways as the gold standard of BAL. Methods In a prospective study, 173 paired samples of NTA and BAL were obtained between June 2016 to August 2018. Samples were collected from all patients undergoing bronchoscopy with spontaneous breathing during general anaesthesia. This study compares the microbiological results from the cultures obtained by investigating complete concordance i.e. identical pathogenic bacteria and coherence i.e. absence or presence of pathogenic bacteria growth between NTA and BAL. Results Samples were collected in 164 patients, 158 children between 21 days and 18 years of age and six young adults still treated at the paediatric department. The overall similarity (complete agreement) was found in 49% [41–56], sensitivity was 35% [27–45], specificity was 66% [55–76], positive predictive value was 36% [27–46] and negative predictive value was 64% [54–64] concerning complete pathogenic bacteria concordance. If we only considered coherence growth of pathogenic bacteria, similarity was 71% [63–79], sensitivity was 74% [64–81], specificity was 66% [55–76], positive predictive value was 75% [65–82] and negative predictive value was 65% [54–75]. Patients with cystic fibrosis showed a similarity of 88% [73–95], a sensitivity of 92% [76–99], a specificity of 71% [36–95], a positive predictive value of 92% [76–99] and a negative predictive value of 71% [36–95] concerning coherence growth of pathogenic bacteria. Conclusion The study indicates that NTA compared to BAL as the gold standard is not clinically useful to assess positive findings of specific bacteria in the lower airway tract. Statistically significantly increased sensitivity and positive predictive value were found in cystic fibrosis patients concerning coherence growth. The clinical usage of NTA remains important as negative findings are of clinical value. However, BAL continues to be preferred as a significantly superior diagnostic tool.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-01992-2PaediatricsNasal tracheal aspirationBronchoalveolar lavageCronic lung diseaseCystic fibrosis
spellingShingle Louise Østergaard Andersen
Hanne Vebert Olesen
Anne Helene Spannow
Sune Leisgaard Mørck Rubak
Validation of nasal tracheal aspiration in children with lung disease
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Paediatrics
Nasal tracheal aspiration
Bronchoalveolar lavage
Cronic lung disease
Cystic fibrosis
title Validation of nasal tracheal aspiration in children with lung disease
title_full Validation of nasal tracheal aspiration in children with lung disease
title_fullStr Validation of nasal tracheal aspiration in children with lung disease
title_full_unstemmed Validation of nasal tracheal aspiration in children with lung disease
title_short Validation of nasal tracheal aspiration in children with lung disease
title_sort validation of nasal tracheal aspiration in children with lung disease
topic Paediatrics
Nasal tracheal aspiration
Bronchoalveolar lavage
Cronic lung disease
Cystic fibrosis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-01992-2
work_keys_str_mv AT louiseøstergaardandersen validationofnasaltrachealaspirationinchildrenwithlungdisease
AT hannevebertolesen validationofnasaltrachealaspirationinchildrenwithlungdisease
AT annehelenespannow validationofnasaltrachealaspirationinchildrenwithlungdisease
AT suneleisgaardmørckrubak validationofnasaltrachealaspirationinchildrenwithlungdisease