Formalized Journal-Style Review Process: Improving the Quality of Students’ Work

Formalized Journal-Style Review Process: Improving the Quality of Students’ Work

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Panagiotis Tsigaris
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-01
Series:	Frontiers in Education
Subjects:	assessment feedback peer review quality term papers
Online Access:	https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2021.701978/full

Similar Items

Journals Need to Adapt Peer-Review Strictly
by: Ravin Bhandari, et al.
Published: (2022-08-01)

Improving the quality of academic reflective writing in Nursing: a comparison of three different interventions
by: Marion Bowman, et al.
Published: (2014-10-01)

Peer-review process in journals dealing with chemistry and related subjects published in Serbia
by: Dekanski Aleksandar, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)

How Digital and Oral Peer Feedback Improves High School Students’ Written Argumentation—A Case Study Exploring the Effectiveness of Peer Feedback in Geography
by: Michael Morawski, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01)

Understanding the Effects of Receiving Peer Feedback for Text Revision: Relations between Author and Reviewer Ability
by: Melissa M. Patchan, et al.
Published: (2016-10-01)

Final Year Medical Students’ Perspective on the Use of Peer Assessments in the Training of Future Doctors to Obtain and Provide Quality Feedback [Letter]
by: Hussain I, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01)

Unveiling the synergy of peer feedback and the Metaverse
by: Junjie Gavin Wu, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01)

Peer feedback: moving from assessment of learning to assessment for learning
by: Sigrun M Wagner
Published: (2016-05-01)

Natural Language Processing techniques for researching and improving peer feedback
by: Wenting Xiong, Diane Litman & Christian Schunn
Published: (2012-11-01)

Interactive Learning with Student Response System to Encourage Students to Provide Peer Feedback
by: Jirarat Sitthiworachart, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)

Meet the editors: cornerstones of publishing in peer reviewed journals
by: Mehmet Akman, et al.
Published: (2013-11-01)

Towards Sustainable Assessment in Higher Education: Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives
by: Makovskaya Liliya
Published: (2022-06-01)

Unfolding principles for student peer feedback: A comparative analysis across higher education contexts
by: Marianne Ellegaard, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01)

Redesigning educational peer review interactions using computer tools: An introduction
by: Ilya M. Goldin, Kevin D. Ashley & Christian D. Schunn
Published: (2012-11-01)

Process and quality of peer review in scientific Nursing journals
by: Wai Tong Chien
Published: (2011-09-01)

Application of peer review in a university course: are students good reviewers?
by: Maria Renza Guelfi, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01)

Questions for Assessment: A Guide for Tutors’ Practice and Student Development
by: Conor McKevitt
Published: (2015-01-01)

Tumor Biology's struggle to survive: A tough lesson for cancer and oncology research journals
by: Teixeira da Silva Jaime A.
Published: (2022-04-01)

WRITTEN PEER FEEDBACK APPERANCES OF C1 LEVEL TURKISH LEARNING FOREIGN STUDENTS
by: Ergün HAMZADAYI
Published: (2015-08-01)

Re-Thinking Peer Reviewing in the Virtual Context: The Roles of Giving and Receiving Online Feedback in L2 Spanish Classrooms
by: Emilia Illana-Mahiques
Published: (2021-09-01)

Applying online peer feedback via a peer review application in English academic writing
by: Nguyen Ngoc Ly
Published: (2023-06-01)

Learning through multiple lenses: analysis of self, peer, nearpeer, and faculty assessments of a clinical history-taking task in Australia
by: Kylie Fitzgerald, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01)

Assessment and Feedback for Large Classes in Transnational Engineering Education: Student–Staff Partnership-Based Innovative Approach
by: Sajjad Hussain, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01)

Peer reviewers' willingness to review, their recommendations and quality of reviews after the Finnish Medical Journal switched from single-blind to double-blind peer review
by: Piitu Parmanne, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01)

Understanding the Difference Between Self-Feedback and Peer Feedback: A Comparative Study of Their Effects on Undergraduate Students' Writing Improvement
by: Qi Lu, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01)

Scientific sinkhole: estimating the cost of peer review based on survey data with snowball sampling
by: Allana G. LeBlanc, et al.
Published: (2023-04-01)

The role of peer review on the improvement of the articles published in the Journal of Birjand University of Medical Sciences
by: Hossein Beydokhti, et al.
Published: (2014-11-01)

Best Practices in Peer Assessment: Training Tomorrow’s Physicians to Obtain and Provide Quality Feedback
by: Lerchenfeldt S, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01)

The Quality Assist: A Technology-Assisted Peer Review Based on Citation Functions to Predict the Paper Quality
by: Setio Basuki, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

Improving the quality of assessment grading tools in Master of Education courses: a comparative case study in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
by: Michael Francis Christie, et al.
Published: (2015-10-01)

Best Practices in Peer Assessment: Training Tomorrow’s Physicians to Obtain and Provide Quality Feedback [Response to Letter]
by: Lerchenfeldt S, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01)

Fostering Autonomous Learning Through Peer Feedback
by: Ema Wilianti Dewi, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01)

Self-Reflection and Peer-Assessments Effect on Pharmacy Students’ Performance at Simulated Counselling Sessions
by: Andrew Bartlett, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01)

IMPROVe: Six research-based principles to realise peer assessment in educational contexts
by: Anna Serbati, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01)

Peer partnerships in teaching: Evaluation of a voluntary model of professional development in tertiary education
by: Andrea Chester
Published: (2012-06-01)

Peer partnerships in teaching: Evaluation of a voluntary model of professional development in tertiary education
by: Andrea Chester
Published: (2012-06-01)

The journal impact factor contest leads to erosion of quality of peer review
by: David Wardle
Published: (2015-02-01)

Peer Instruction-Based Feedback Sessions Improve the Retention of Knowledge in Medical Students
by: Silvia Maria Riceto Ronchim Passeri, et al.
Published: (2019-05-01)

The Effect of Corrective Feedback on the Writing Accuracy of Feedback Givers and Receivers
by: Elnaz Azizian, et al.
Published: (2015-11-01)

Turnitin peer feedback: controversial vs. non-controversial essays
by: Mohammed Abdullah Alharbi, et al.
Published: (2020-05-01)