Repasi vs Plaumann
<p>On 10 October 2022 MEP René Repasi lodged an action for annulment against the complementary taxonomy delegated regulation 2022/1214. The same regulation is also challenged by Austria, a privileged applicant under Article 263 TFEU. This post focuses on the issue which MEP Repasi himself has...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
2022-10-01
|
| Series: | Verfassungsblog |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://verfassungsblog.de/repasi-vs-plaumann/ |
| _version_ | 1811182122841407488 |
|---|---|
| author | Merijn Chamon Mariolina Eliantonio Annalisa Volpato |
| author_facet | Merijn Chamon Mariolina Eliantonio Annalisa Volpato |
| author_sort | Merijn Chamon |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>On 10 October 2022 MEP René Repasi lodged an action for annulment against the complementary taxonomy delegated regulation 2022/1214. The same regulation is also challenged by Austria, a privileged applicant under Article 263 TFEU. This post focuses on the issue which MEP Repasi himself has noted is the most innovative of his action, namely the question whether an individual MEP has special legal standing to challenge an act (of the Commission) that affects how that MEP fulfils his parliamentary function.</p>
|
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T09:27:49Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-57eb2e6cdce64dc69ea8f535133c54ec |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2366-7044 |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T09:27:49Z |
| publishDate | 2022-10-01 |
| publisher | Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Verfassungsblog |
| spelling | doaj.art-57eb2e6cdce64dc69ea8f535133c54ec2022-12-22T04:31:59ZdeuMax Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbHVerfassungsblog2366-70442022-10-012366-7044Repasi vs PlaumannMerijn ChamonMariolina EliantonioAnnalisa Volpato<p>On 10 October 2022 MEP René Repasi lodged an action for annulment against the complementary taxonomy delegated regulation 2022/1214. The same regulation is also challenged by Austria, a privileged applicant under Article 263 TFEU. This post focuses on the issue which MEP Repasi himself has noted is the most innovative of his action, namely the question whether an individual MEP has special legal standing to challenge an act (of the Commission) that affects how that MEP fulfils his parliamentary function.</p> https://verfassungsblog.de/repasi-vs-plaumann/Art. 263, Art. 263 TFEU, CJEU, European Parliament, OLP, Plaumann |
| spellingShingle | Merijn Chamon Mariolina Eliantonio Annalisa Volpato Repasi vs Plaumann Verfassungsblog Art. 263, Art. 263 TFEU, CJEU, European Parliament, OLP, Plaumann |
| title | Repasi vs Plaumann |
| title_full | Repasi vs Plaumann |
| title_fullStr | Repasi vs Plaumann |
| title_full_unstemmed | Repasi vs Plaumann |
| title_short | Repasi vs Plaumann |
| title_sort | repasi vs plaumann |
| topic | Art. 263, Art. 263 TFEU, CJEU, European Parliament, OLP, Plaumann |
| url | https://verfassungsblog.de/repasi-vs-plaumann/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT merijnchamon repasivsplaumann AT mariolinaeliantonio repasivsplaumann AT annalisavolpato repasivsplaumann |