Outcomes and Costs in Patients with Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Receiving Front-Line Versus Delayed Caplacizumab: A US Hospital Database Study

European real-world data indicate that front-line treatment with caplacizumab is associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with delayed caplacizumab treatment. The objective of the study was to describe the characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes in hospitalized patients with an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alix Arnaud MS, Samantha Schilsky PhD, MPH, Jackie Lucia BS, Marta Maia MS, Fernando Laredo MS, Ana Paula Marques MD, Hikaru Okada MD, PhD, Andrew W. Roberts PharmD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2024-03-01
Series:Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/10760296241241525
_version_ 1797246449086365696
author Alix Arnaud MS
Samantha Schilsky PhD, MPH
Jackie Lucia BS
Marta Maia MS
Fernando Laredo MS
Ana Paula Marques MD
Hikaru Okada MD, PhD
Andrew W. Roberts PharmD, PhD
author_facet Alix Arnaud MS
Samantha Schilsky PhD, MPH
Jackie Lucia BS
Marta Maia MS
Fernando Laredo MS
Ana Paula Marques MD
Hikaru Okada MD, PhD
Andrew W. Roberts PharmD, PhD
author_sort Alix Arnaud MS
collection DOAJ
description European real-world data indicate that front-line treatment with caplacizumab is associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with delayed caplacizumab treatment. The objective of the study was to describe the characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes in hospitalized patients with an immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) episode treated with front-line versus delayed caplacizumab in the US. This retrospective cohort analysis of a US hospital database included adult patients (≥18 years) with an acute iTTP episode (a diagnosis of thrombotic microangiopathy and ≥1 therapeutic plasma exchange [TPE] procedure) from January 21, 2019, to February 28, 2021. Unadjusted baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs were compared between patients who received front-line versus delayed (<2 vs ≥2 days after TPE initiation) caplacizumab treatment. Out of 39 patients, 16 (41.0%) received front-line and 23 (59.0%) received delayed treatment with caplacizumab. Baseline characteristics and symptoms were similar between the two groups. Patients who received front-line caplacizumab treatment had significantly fewer TPE administrations (median: 5.0 vs 12.0); and a significantly shorter hospital stay (median: 9.0 days vs 16.0 days) than patients receiving delayed caplacizumab therapy. Both of these were significantly lower in comparison of means (t-test P  < .01). Median inpatient costs (inclusive of caplacizumab costs) were 54% higher in the delayed treated patients than in the front-line treated patients (median: $112 711 vs $73 318). TPE-specific cost was lower in the front-line treated cohort (median: $6 989 vs $10 917). In conclusion, front-line treatment with caplacizumab had shorter hospitalizations, lower healthcare resource utilization, and lower costs than delayed caplacizumab treatment after TPE therapy.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T19:42:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-57ed4bbdb186466689910ea32b319189
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1938-2723
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T19:42:58Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
spelling doaj.art-57ed4bbdb186466689910ea32b3191892024-03-25T10:04:50ZengSAGE PublishingClinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis1938-27232024-03-013010.1177/10760296241241525Outcomes and Costs in Patients with Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Receiving Front-Line Versus Delayed Caplacizumab: A US Hospital Database StudyAlix Arnaud MS0Samantha Schilsky PhD, MPH1Jackie Lucia BS2Marta Maia MS3Fernando Laredo MS4Ana Paula Marques MD5Hikaru Okada MD, PhD6Andrew W. Roberts PharmD, PhD7 Sanofi, Boston, MA, USA Aetion, Inc., New York, NY, USA Aetion, Inc., New York, NY, USA , Lisbon, Portugal Sanofi, São Paulo, Brazil Sanofi, São Paulo, Brazil Sanofi K.K., Tokyo, Japan Aetion, Inc., New York, NY, USAEuropean real-world data indicate that front-line treatment with caplacizumab is associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with delayed caplacizumab treatment. The objective of the study was to describe the characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes in hospitalized patients with an immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) episode treated with front-line versus delayed caplacizumab in the US. This retrospective cohort analysis of a US hospital database included adult patients (≥18 years) with an acute iTTP episode (a diagnosis of thrombotic microangiopathy and ≥1 therapeutic plasma exchange [TPE] procedure) from January 21, 2019, to February 28, 2021. Unadjusted baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs were compared between patients who received front-line versus delayed (<2 vs ≥2 days after TPE initiation) caplacizumab treatment. Out of 39 patients, 16 (41.0%) received front-line and 23 (59.0%) received delayed treatment with caplacizumab. Baseline characteristics and symptoms were similar between the two groups. Patients who received front-line caplacizumab treatment had significantly fewer TPE administrations (median: 5.0 vs 12.0); and a significantly shorter hospital stay (median: 9.0 days vs 16.0 days) than patients receiving delayed caplacizumab therapy. Both of these were significantly lower in comparison of means (t-test P  < .01). Median inpatient costs (inclusive of caplacizumab costs) were 54% higher in the delayed treated patients than in the front-line treated patients (median: $112 711 vs $73 318). TPE-specific cost was lower in the front-line treated cohort (median: $6 989 vs $10 917). In conclusion, front-line treatment with caplacizumab had shorter hospitalizations, lower healthcare resource utilization, and lower costs than delayed caplacizumab treatment after TPE therapy.https://doi.org/10.1177/10760296241241525
spellingShingle Alix Arnaud MS
Samantha Schilsky PhD, MPH
Jackie Lucia BS
Marta Maia MS
Fernando Laredo MS
Ana Paula Marques MD
Hikaru Okada MD, PhD
Andrew W. Roberts PharmD, PhD
Outcomes and Costs in Patients with Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Receiving Front-Line Versus Delayed Caplacizumab: A US Hospital Database Study
Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
title Outcomes and Costs in Patients with Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Receiving Front-Line Versus Delayed Caplacizumab: A US Hospital Database Study
title_full Outcomes and Costs in Patients with Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Receiving Front-Line Versus Delayed Caplacizumab: A US Hospital Database Study
title_fullStr Outcomes and Costs in Patients with Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Receiving Front-Line Versus Delayed Caplacizumab: A US Hospital Database Study
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes and Costs in Patients with Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Receiving Front-Line Versus Delayed Caplacizumab: A US Hospital Database Study
title_short Outcomes and Costs in Patients with Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Receiving Front-Line Versus Delayed Caplacizumab: A US Hospital Database Study
title_sort outcomes and costs in patients with immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura receiving front line versus delayed caplacizumab a us hospital database study
url https://doi.org/10.1177/10760296241241525
work_keys_str_mv AT alixarnaudms outcomesandcostsinpatientswithimmunethromboticthrombocytopenicpurpurareceivingfrontlineversusdelayedcaplacizumabaushospitaldatabasestudy
AT samanthaschilskyphdmph outcomesandcostsinpatientswithimmunethromboticthrombocytopenicpurpurareceivingfrontlineversusdelayedcaplacizumabaushospitaldatabasestudy
AT jackieluciabs outcomesandcostsinpatientswithimmunethromboticthrombocytopenicpurpurareceivingfrontlineversusdelayedcaplacizumabaushospitaldatabasestudy
AT martamaiams outcomesandcostsinpatientswithimmunethromboticthrombocytopenicpurpurareceivingfrontlineversusdelayedcaplacizumabaushospitaldatabasestudy
AT fernandolaredoms outcomesandcostsinpatientswithimmunethromboticthrombocytopenicpurpurareceivingfrontlineversusdelayedcaplacizumabaushospitaldatabasestudy
AT anapaulamarquesmd outcomesandcostsinpatientswithimmunethromboticthrombocytopenicpurpurareceivingfrontlineversusdelayedcaplacizumabaushospitaldatabasestudy
AT hikaruokadamdphd outcomesandcostsinpatientswithimmunethromboticthrombocytopenicpurpurareceivingfrontlineversusdelayedcaplacizumabaushospitaldatabasestudy
AT andrewwrobertspharmdphd outcomesandcostsinpatientswithimmunethromboticthrombocytopenicpurpurareceivingfrontlineversusdelayedcaplacizumabaushospitaldatabasestudy