Outcomes and Costs in Patients with Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Receiving Front-Line Versus Delayed Caplacizumab: A US Hospital Database Study
European real-world data indicate that front-line treatment with caplacizumab is associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with delayed caplacizumab treatment. The objective of the study was to describe the characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes in hospitalized patients with an...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2024-03-01
|
Series: | Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/10760296241241525 |
_version_ | 1797246449086365696 |
---|---|
author | Alix Arnaud MS Samantha Schilsky PhD, MPH Jackie Lucia BS Marta Maia MS Fernando Laredo MS Ana Paula Marques MD Hikaru Okada MD, PhD Andrew W. Roberts PharmD, PhD |
author_facet | Alix Arnaud MS Samantha Schilsky PhD, MPH Jackie Lucia BS Marta Maia MS Fernando Laredo MS Ana Paula Marques MD Hikaru Okada MD, PhD Andrew W. Roberts PharmD, PhD |
author_sort | Alix Arnaud MS |
collection | DOAJ |
description | European real-world data indicate that front-line treatment with caplacizumab is associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with delayed caplacizumab treatment. The objective of the study was to describe the characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes in hospitalized patients with an immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) episode treated with front-line versus delayed caplacizumab in the US. This retrospective cohort analysis of a US hospital database included adult patients (≥18 years) with an acute iTTP episode (a diagnosis of thrombotic microangiopathy and ≥1 therapeutic plasma exchange [TPE] procedure) from January 21, 2019, to February 28, 2021. Unadjusted baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs were compared between patients who received front-line versus delayed (<2 vs ≥2 days after TPE initiation) caplacizumab treatment. Out of 39 patients, 16 (41.0%) received front-line and 23 (59.0%) received delayed treatment with caplacizumab. Baseline characteristics and symptoms were similar between the two groups. Patients who received front-line caplacizumab treatment had significantly fewer TPE administrations (median: 5.0 vs 12.0); and a significantly shorter hospital stay (median: 9.0 days vs 16.0 days) than patients receiving delayed caplacizumab therapy. Both of these were significantly lower in comparison of means (t-test P < .01). Median inpatient costs (inclusive of caplacizumab costs) were 54% higher in the delayed treated patients than in the front-line treated patients (median: $112 711 vs $73 318). TPE-specific cost was lower in the front-line treated cohort (median: $6 989 vs $10 917). In conclusion, front-line treatment with caplacizumab had shorter hospitalizations, lower healthcare resource utilization, and lower costs than delayed caplacizumab treatment after TPE therapy. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-24T19:42:58Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-57ed4bbdb186466689910ea32b319189 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1938-2723 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-24T19:42:58Z |
publishDate | 2024-03-01 |
publisher | SAGE Publishing |
record_format | Article |
series | Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis |
spelling | doaj.art-57ed4bbdb186466689910ea32b3191892024-03-25T10:04:50ZengSAGE PublishingClinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis1938-27232024-03-013010.1177/10760296241241525Outcomes and Costs in Patients with Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Receiving Front-Line Versus Delayed Caplacizumab: A US Hospital Database StudyAlix Arnaud MS0Samantha Schilsky PhD, MPH1Jackie Lucia BS2Marta Maia MS3Fernando Laredo MS4Ana Paula Marques MD5Hikaru Okada MD, PhD6Andrew W. Roberts PharmD, PhD7 Sanofi, Boston, MA, USA Aetion, Inc., New York, NY, USA Aetion, Inc., New York, NY, USA , Lisbon, Portugal Sanofi, São Paulo, Brazil Sanofi, São Paulo, Brazil Sanofi K.K., Tokyo, Japan Aetion, Inc., New York, NY, USAEuropean real-world data indicate that front-line treatment with caplacizumab is associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with delayed caplacizumab treatment. The objective of the study was to describe the characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes in hospitalized patients with an immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) episode treated with front-line versus delayed caplacizumab in the US. This retrospective cohort analysis of a US hospital database included adult patients (≥18 years) with an acute iTTP episode (a diagnosis of thrombotic microangiopathy and ≥1 therapeutic plasma exchange [TPE] procedure) from January 21, 2019, to February 28, 2021. Unadjusted baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs were compared between patients who received front-line versus delayed (<2 vs ≥2 days after TPE initiation) caplacizumab treatment. Out of 39 patients, 16 (41.0%) received front-line and 23 (59.0%) received delayed treatment with caplacizumab. Baseline characteristics and symptoms were similar between the two groups. Patients who received front-line caplacizumab treatment had significantly fewer TPE administrations (median: 5.0 vs 12.0); and a significantly shorter hospital stay (median: 9.0 days vs 16.0 days) than patients receiving delayed caplacizumab therapy. Both of these were significantly lower in comparison of means (t-test P < .01). Median inpatient costs (inclusive of caplacizumab costs) were 54% higher in the delayed treated patients than in the front-line treated patients (median: $112 711 vs $73 318). TPE-specific cost was lower in the front-line treated cohort (median: $6 989 vs $10 917). In conclusion, front-line treatment with caplacizumab had shorter hospitalizations, lower healthcare resource utilization, and lower costs than delayed caplacizumab treatment after TPE therapy.https://doi.org/10.1177/10760296241241525 |
spellingShingle | Alix Arnaud MS Samantha Schilsky PhD, MPH Jackie Lucia BS Marta Maia MS Fernando Laredo MS Ana Paula Marques MD Hikaru Okada MD, PhD Andrew W. Roberts PharmD, PhD Outcomes and Costs in Patients with Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Receiving Front-Line Versus Delayed Caplacizumab: A US Hospital Database Study Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis |
title | Outcomes and Costs in Patients with Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Receiving Front-Line Versus Delayed Caplacizumab: A US Hospital Database Study |
title_full | Outcomes and Costs in Patients with Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Receiving Front-Line Versus Delayed Caplacizumab: A US Hospital Database Study |
title_fullStr | Outcomes and Costs in Patients with Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Receiving Front-Line Versus Delayed Caplacizumab: A US Hospital Database Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes and Costs in Patients with Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Receiving Front-Line Versus Delayed Caplacizumab: A US Hospital Database Study |
title_short | Outcomes and Costs in Patients with Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Receiving Front-Line Versus Delayed Caplacizumab: A US Hospital Database Study |
title_sort | outcomes and costs in patients with immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura receiving front line versus delayed caplacizumab a us hospital database study |
url | https://doi.org/10.1177/10760296241241525 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alixarnaudms outcomesandcostsinpatientswithimmunethromboticthrombocytopenicpurpurareceivingfrontlineversusdelayedcaplacizumabaushospitaldatabasestudy AT samanthaschilskyphdmph outcomesandcostsinpatientswithimmunethromboticthrombocytopenicpurpurareceivingfrontlineversusdelayedcaplacizumabaushospitaldatabasestudy AT jackieluciabs outcomesandcostsinpatientswithimmunethromboticthrombocytopenicpurpurareceivingfrontlineversusdelayedcaplacizumabaushospitaldatabasestudy AT martamaiams outcomesandcostsinpatientswithimmunethromboticthrombocytopenicpurpurareceivingfrontlineversusdelayedcaplacizumabaushospitaldatabasestudy AT fernandolaredoms outcomesandcostsinpatientswithimmunethromboticthrombocytopenicpurpurareceivingfrontlineversusdelayedcaplacizumabaushospitaldatabasestudy AT anapaulamarquesmd outcomesandcostsinpatientswithimmunethromboticthrombocytopenicpurpurareceivingfrontlineversusdelayedcaplacizumabaushospitaldatabasestudy AT hikaruokadamdphd outcomesandcostsinpatientswithimmunethromboticthrombocytopenicpurpurareceivingfrontlineversusdelayedcaplacizumabaushospitaldatabasestudy AT andrewwrobertspharmdphd outcomesandcostsinpatientswithimmunethromboticthrombocytopenicpurpurareceivingfrontlineversusdelayedcaplacizumabaushospitaldatabasestudy |