Regenerate the urban space as a common/generate commons through urban space: a reflection on the comparison of urban commoning tools in France and Italy
Abstract In the rich and complex framework that today define the debate about urban commons, our contribution focuses on the relations between commoning processes and urban regeneration. In the last 5 years, we can see emerging different experimental public policies and urban transformation processe...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SpringerOpen
2022-06-01
|
| Series: | City, Territory and Architecture |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-022-00157-2 |
| _version_ | 1811229996389236736 |
|---|---|
| author | Teresa Carlone Federica Gatta Cécile Léonardi Ianira Vassallo |
| author_facet | Teresa Carlone Federica Gatta Cécile Léonardi Ianira Vassallo |
| author_sort | Teresa Carlone |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract In the rich and complex framework that today define the debate about urban commons, our contribution focuses on the relations between commoning processes and urban regeneration. In the last 5 years, we can see emerging different experimental public policies and urban transformation processes that aim not only to give citizens the possibility to manage public properties in a common interest, but also to encourage private groups to take charge of the architectural transformation of public buildings. This paper focuses on the extents and limits of the comparison between two European countries, Italy and France, more precisely between the cities of Turin, Bologna and Grenoble. In the three cities we find similar case studies in terms of actors, stakes and urban impacts. To enquire on those similarities needs a methodology that can highlight the way in which those apparently sporadic cases challenge the existing knowledge on urban commons. Our objective is to question not only the impacts of commons on city governance, but also on how spaces are reshaped and redesigned by commoning practices. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T10:21:20Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-57f82c7dbd764023b726c338f6bd4d59 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2195-2701 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T10:21:20Z |
| publishDate | 2022-06-01 |
| publisher | SpringerOpen |
| record_format | Article |
| series | City, Territory and Architecture |
| spelling | doaj.art-57f82c7dbd764023b726c338f6bd4d592022-12-22T03:37:04ZengSpringerOpenCity, Territory and Architecture2195-27012022-06-019111110.1186/s40410-022-00157-2Regenerate the urban space as a common/generate commons through urban space: a reflection on the comparison of urban commoning tools in France and ItalyTeresa Carlone0Federica Gatta1Cécile Léonardi2Ianira Vassallo3Department of Sociology and Business Law, University of BolognaPACTE, University Grenoble AlpesNational School of Architecture, Research unity AE&CC, University Grenoble-AlpesInteruniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning, Polytechnic of TurinAbstract In the rich and complex framework that today define the debate about urban commons, our contribution focuses on the relations between commoning processes and urban regeneration. In the last 5 years, we can see emerging different experimental public policies and urban transformation processes that aim not only to give citizens the possibility to manage public properties in a common interest, but also to encourage private groups to take charge of the architectural transformation of public buildings. This paper focuses on the extents and limits of the comparison between two European countries, Italy and France, more precisely between the cities of Turin, Bologna and Grenoble. In the three cities we find similar case studies in terms of actors, stakes and urban impacts. To enquire on those similarities needs a methodology that can highlight the way in which those apparently sporadic cases challenge the existing knowledge on urban commons. Our objective is to question not only the impacts of commons on city governance, but also on how spaces are reshaped and redesigned by commoning practices.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-022-00157-2ToolsUrban regenerationComparison methodologyItalian and French case studiesAusterity urbanismCommoning processes |
| spellingShingle | Teresa Carlone Federica Gatta Cécile Léonardi Ianira Vassallo Regenerate the urban space as a common/generate commons through urban space: a reflection on the comparison of urban commoning tools in France and Italy City, Territory and Architecture Tools Urban regeneration Comparison methodology Italian and French case studies Austerity urbanism Commoning processes |
| title | Regenerate the urban space as a common/generate commons through urban space: a reflection on the comparison of urban commoning tools in France and Italy |
| title_full | Regenerate the urban space as a common/generate commons through urban space: a reflection on the comparison of urban commoning tools in France and Italy |
| title_fullStr | Regenerate the urban space as a common/generate commons through urban space: a reflection on the comparison of urban commoning tools in France and Italy |
| title_full_unstemmed | Regenerate the urban space as a common/generate commons through urban space: a reflection on the comparison of urban commoning tools in France and Italy |
| title_short | Regenerate the urban space as a common/generate commons through urban space: a reflection on the comparison of urban commoning tools in France and Italy |
| title_sort | regenerate the urban space as a common generate commons through urban space a reflection on the comparison of urban commoning tools in france and italy |
| topic | Tools Urban regeneration Comparison methodology Italian and French case studies Austerity urbanism Commoning processes |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-022-00157-2 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT teresacarlone regeneratetheurbanspaceasacommongeneratecommonsthroughurbanspaceareflectiononthecomparisonofurbancommoningtoolsinfranceanditaly AT federicagatta regeneratetheurbanspaceasacommongeneratecommonsthroughurbanspaceareflectiononthecomparisonofurbancommoningtoolsinfranceanditaly AT cecileleonardi regeneratetheurbanspaceasacommongeneratecommonsthroughurbanspaceareflectiononthecomparisonofurbancommoningtoolsinfranceanditaly AT ianiravassallo regeneratetheurbanspaceasacommongeneratecommonsthroughurbanspaceareflectiononthecomparisonofurbancommoningtoolsinfranceanditaly |