Considerations on Logical Consequence and Natural Language
In a recent article, “Logical Consequence and Natural Language,” Michael Glanzberg claims that there is no relation of logical consequence in natural language (2015). The present paper counters that claim. I shall discuss Glanzberg’s arguments and show why they don’t hold. I further show how Glanzb...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Philosophie.ch
2022-11-01
|
| Series: | Dialectica |
| Online Access: | https://dialectica.philosophie.ch/dialectica/article/view/17 |
| Summary: | In a recent article, “Logical Consequence and Natural Language,” Michael Glanzberg claims that there is no relation of logical consequence in natural language (2015). The present paper counters that claim. I shall discuss Glanzberg’s arguments and show why they don’t hold. I further show how Glanzberg’s claims may be used to rather support the existence of logical consequence in natural language.
|
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0012-2017 1746-8361 |