Gamma irradiation does not induce detectable changes in DNA methylation directly following exposure of human cells.

Environmental chemicals and radiation have often been implicated in producing alterations of the epigenome thus potentially contributing to cancer and other diseases. Ionizing radiation, released during accidents at nuclear power plants or after atomic bomb explosions, is a potentially serious healt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christoph Lahtz, Steven E Bates, Yong Jiang, Arthur X Li, Xiwei Wu, Maria A Hahn, Gerd P Pfeifer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3443085?pdf=render
_version_ 1811271835998748672
author Christoph Lahtz
Steven E Bates
Yong Jiang
Arthur X Li
Xiwei Wu
Maria A Hahn
Gerd P Pfeifer
author_facet Christoph Lahtz
Steven E Bates
Yong Jiang
Arthur X Li
Xiwei Wu
Maria A Hahn
Gerd P Pfeifer
author_sort Christoph Lahtz
collection DOAJ
description Environmental chemicals and radiation have often been implicated in producing alterations of the epigenome thus potentially contributing to cancer and other diseases. Ionizing radiation, released during accidents at nuclear power plants or after atomic bomb explosions, is a potentially serious health threat for the exposed human population. This type of high-energy radiation causes DNA damage including single- and double-strand breaks and induces chromosomal rearrangements and mutations, but it is not known if ionizing radiation directly induces changes in the epigenome of irradiated cells. We treated normal human fibroblasts and normal human bronchial epithelial cells with different doses of γ-radiation emitted from a cesium 137 ((137)Cs) radiation source. After a seven-day recovery period, we analyzed global DNA methylation patterns in the irradiated and control cells using the methylated-CpG island recovery assay (MIRA) in combination with high-resolution microarrays. Bioinformatics analysis revealed only a small number of potential methylation changes with low fold-difference ratios in the irradiated cells. These minor methylation differences seen on the microarrays could not be verified by COBRA (combined bisulfite restriction analysis) or bisulfite sequencing of selected target loci. Our study shows that acute γ-radiation treatment of two types of human cells had no appreciable direct effect on DNA cytosine methylation patterns in exposed cells.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T22:28:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-582dc89845924027962f4059e400fd1e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T22:28:14Z
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-582dc89845924027962f4059e400fd1e2022-12-22T03:14:03ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0179e4485810.1371/journal.pone.0044858Gamma irradiation does not induce detectable changes in DNA methylation directly following exposure of human cells.Christoph LahtzSteven E BatesYong JiangArthur X LiXiwei WuMaria A HahnGerd P PfeiferEnvironmental chemicals and radiation have often been implicated in producing alterations of the epigenome thus potentially contributing to cancer and other diseases. Ionizing radiation, released during accidents at nuclear power plants or after atomic bomb explosions, is a potentially serious health threat for the exposed human population. This type of high-energy radiation causes DNA damage including single- and double-strand breaks and induces chromosomal rearrangements and mutations, but it is not known if ionizing radiation directly induces changes in the epigenome of irradiated cells. We treated normal human fibroblasts and normal human bronchial epithelial cells with different doses of γ-radiation emitted from a cesium 137 ((137)Cs) radiation source. After a seven-day recovery period, we analyzed global DNA methylation patterns in the irradiated and control cells using the methylated-CpG island recovery assay (MIRA) in combination with high-resolution microarrays. Bioinformatics analysis revealed only a small number of potential methylation changes with low fold-difference ratios in the irradiated cells. These minor methylation differences seen on the microarrays could not be verified by COBRA (combined bisulfite restriction analysis) or bisulfite sequencing of selected target loci. Our study shows that acute γ-radiation treatment of two types of human cells had no appreciable direct effect on DNA cytosine methylation patterns in exposed cells.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3443085?pdf=render
spellingShingle Christoph Lahtz
Steven E Bates
Yong Jiang
Arthur X Li
Xiwei Wu
Maria A Hahn
Gerd P Pfeifer
Gamma irradiation does not induce detectable changes in DNA methylation directly following exposure of human cells.
PLoS ONE
title Gamma irradiation does not induce detectable changes in DNA methylation directly following exposure of human cells.
title_full Gamma irradiation does not induce detectable changes in DNA methylation directly following exposure of human cells.
title_fullStr Gamma irradiation does not induce detectable changes in DNA methylation directly following exposure of human cells.
title_full_unstemmed Gamma irradiation does not induce detectable changes in DNA methylation directly following exposure of human cells.
title_short Gamma irradiation does not induce detectable changes in DNA methylation directly following exposure of human cells.
title_sort gamma irradiation does not induce detectable changes in dna methylation directly following exposure of human cells
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3443085?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT christophlahtz gammairradiationdoesnotinducedetectablechangesindnamethylationdirectlyfollowingexposureofhumancells
AT stevenebates gammairradiationdoesnotinducedetectablechangesindnamethylationdirectlyfollowingexposureofhumancells
AT yongjiang gammairradiationdoesnotinducedetectablechangesindnamethylationdirectlyfollowingexposureofhumancells
AT arthurxli gammairradiationdoesnotinducedetectablechangesindnamethylationdirectlyfollowingexposureofhumancells
AT xiweiwu gammairradiationdoesnotinducedetectablechangesindnamethylationdirectlyfollowingexposureofhumancells
AT mariaahahn gammairradiationdoesnotinducedetectablechangesindnamethylationdirectlyfollowingexposureofhumancells
AT gerdppfeifer gammairradiationdoesnotinducedetectablechangesindnamethylationdirectlyfollowingexposureofhumancells