4464 Effect of Surface Topography on In Vitro and Mechanical Performance of 3D Printed Titanium

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The goal of the study is to understand how changing the surface roughness of 3D printed Titanium either by processing printed samples or artificially printing rough topography impacts the mechanical and biological properties of the Titanium. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Titanium dog b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bijan Abar, Cambre Kelly, Anh Pham, Nicholas Allen, Helena Barber, Alexander Kelly, Ken Gall, Samuel Adams
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2020-06-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866120003866/type/journal_article
_version_ 1811155097269305344
author Bijan Abar
Cambre Kelly
Anh Pham
Nicholas Allen
Helena Barber
Alexander Kelly
Ken Gall
Samuel Adams
author_facet Bijan Abar
Cambre Kelly
Anh Pham
Nicholas Allen
Helena Barber
Alexander Kelly
Ken Gall
Samuel Adams
author_sort Bijan Abar
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The goal of the study is to understand how changing the surface roughness of 3D printed Titanium either by processing printed samples or artificially printing rough topography impacts the mechanical and biological properties of the Titanium. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Titanium dog bones and discs were printed via laser powder bed fusion. groups were defined as 1. polished, 2.blasted, 4.as built, 4.sprouts and 5.rough sprouts. Roughness was measured with line measurement using a confocal microscope. Tensile testing of dog bones produced stress strain curves. MC3T3 preosteoblast were seeded on discs. Samples were analyzed at 0, 2, and 4 weeks. A cell viability assay and confocal fluorescent microscopy assessed cell growth. Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) assay and Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) examined cell differentiation. Extracellular matrix (ECM) was stained for collagen and calcium. Scanning Electron Microcopy (SEM) was done on sputter coated discs. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Measured roughness defined by Rz, maximum peak to valley distance of the sample profile ranged from 2.6-65.1 µm. The addition of printed roughness in the sprouts and rough sprouts group significantly diminished ductility resulting in early strain to failure during tensile testing. Cells adhered and proliferated on discs regardless of roughness group. There was no statistical difference in ALP activity, but qPCR showed that rough groups (sprouts and rough sprouts) had diminished Osteocalcin gene expression at week 2 and 4. The ECM in the rough groups was more resistant to repeated washes and was more extensive with SEM. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Printing roughness diminished mechanical properties without clear benefit to cell growth. Roughness features were on mesoscale, unlike samples in literature on microscale that increase cell activity. Printed topography may aid in implant fixation and not osseous integration as hypothesized. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DESCRIPTION: Dr. Samual Adams, Dr. Ken Gall and Cambre Kelly own stock and/or stock options in restor3d, Inc.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:28:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-583f3aa95d5f4ff787fcbc21410ae1c1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2059-8661
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:28:29Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
spelling doaj.art-583f3aa95d5f4ff787fcbc21410ae1c12023-03-10T08:51:34ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Clinical and Translational Science2059-86612020-06-01413013010.1017/cts.2020.3864464 Effect of Surface Topography on In Vitro and Mechanical Performance of 3D Printed TitaniumBijan Abar0Cambre Kelly1Anh Pham2Nicholas Allen3Helena Barber4Alexander Kelly5Ken Gall6Samuel Adams7Duke UniversityDuke UniversityDuke UniversityDuke UniversityDuke UniversityDuke UniversityDuke UniversityDuke UniversityOBJECTIVES/GOALS: The goal of the study is to understand how changing the surface roughness of 3D printed Titanium either by processing printed samples or artificially printing rough topography impacts the mechanical and biological properties of the Titanium. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Titanium dog bones and discs were printed via laser powder bed fusion. groups were defined as 1. polished, 2.blasted, 4.as built, 4.sprouts and 5.rough sprouts. Roughness was measured with line measurement using a confocal microscope. Tensile testing of dog bones produced stress strain curves. MC3T3 preosteoblast were seeded on discs. Samples were analyzed at 0, 2, and 4 weeks. A cell viability assay and confocal fluorescent microscopy assessed cell growth. Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) assay and Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) examined cell differentiation. Extracellular matrix (ECM) was stained for collagen and calcium. Scanning Electron Microcopy (SEM) was done on sputter coated discs. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Measured roughness defined by Rz, maximum peak to valley distance of the sample profile ranged from 2.6-65.1 µm. The addition of printed roughness in the sprouts and rough sprouts group significantly diminished ductility resulting in early strain to failure during tensile testing. Cells adhered and proliferated on discs regardless of roughness group. There was no statistical difference in ALP activity, but qPCR showed that rough groups (sprouts and rough sprouts) had diminished Osteocalcin gene expression at week 2 and 4. The ECM in the rough groups was more resistant to repeated washes and was more extensive with SEM. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Printing roughness diminished mechanical properties without clear benefit to cell growth. Roughness features were on mesoscale, unlike samples in literature on microscale that increase cell activity. Printed topography may aid in implant fixation and not osseous integration as hypothesized. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DESCRIPTION: Dr. Samual Adams, Dr. Ken Gall and Cambre Kelly own stock and/or stock options in restor3d, Inc.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866120003866/type/journal_article
spellingShingle Bijan Abar
Cambre Kelly
Anh Pham
Nicholas Allen
Helena Barber
Alexander Kelly
Ken Gall
Samuel Adams
4464 Effect of Surface Topography on In Vitro and Mechanical Performance of 3D Printed Titanium
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
title 4464 Effect of Surface Topography on In Vitro and Mechanical Performance of 3D Printed Titanium
title_full 4464 Effect of Surface Topography on In Vitro and Mechanical Performance of 3D Printed Titanium
title_fullStr 4464 Effect of Surface Topography on In Vitro and Mechanical Performance of 3D Printed Titanium
title_full_unstemmed 4464 Effect of Surface Topography on In Vitro and Mechanical Performance of 3D Printed Titanium
title_short 4464 Effect of Surface Topography on In Vitro and Mechanical Performance of 3D Printed Titanium
title_sort 4464 effect of surface topography on in vitro and mechanical performance of 3d printed titanium
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866120003866/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT bijanabar 4464effectofsurfacetopographyoninvitroandmechanicalperformanceof3dprintedtitanium
AT cambrekelly 4464effectofsurfacetopographyoninvitroandmechanicalperformanceof3dprintedtitanium
AT anhpham 4464effectofsurfacetopographyoninvitroandmechanicalperformanceof3dprintedtitanium
AT nicholasallen 4464effectofsurfacetopographyoninvitroandmechanicalperformanceof3dprintedtitanium
AT helenabarber 4464effectofsurfacetopographyoninvitroandmechanicalperformanceof3dprintedtitanium
AT alexanderkelly 4464effectofsurfacetopographyoninvitroandmechanicalperformanceof3dprintedtitanium
AT kengall 4464effectofsurfacetopographyoninvitroandmechanicalperformanceof3dprintedtitanium
AT samueladams 4464effectofsurfacetopographyoninvitroandmechanicalperformanceof3dprintedtitanium