Reinventing Formulas for Construction Project Delay Index Due to Management and Production
The objective of this study is to construct a precise formula for the management and production delay indicators that are integrated into Ms. Project's dashboard. Two simulation techniques, such as the manual formula computation and calculation integrated into the Ms. Project dashboard, were em...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Ital Publication
2023-12-01
|
| Series: | HighTech and Innovation Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hightechjournal.org/index.php/HIJ/article/view/548 |
| _version_ | 1797296137612296192 |
|---|---|
| author | Putri Lynna A. Luthan Nathanael Sitanggang Syafriandi Syafriandi |
| author_facet | Putri Lynna A. Luthan Nathanael Sitanggang Syafriandi Syafriandi |
| author_sort | Putri Lynna A. Luthan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The objective of this study is to construct a precise formula for the management and production delay indicators that are integrated into Ms. Project's dashboard. Two simulation techniques, such as the manual formula computation and calculation integrated into the Ms. Project dashboard, were employed. Due to management and the production team's tardiness, the data were obtained through trial-and-error methods. Excel was used to analyze the data, and Ms. Project was used to enter the calculations. The research showed that the Ms. Project dashboard formula gave more detailed information about the construction project, including: (1) contract value; (2) actual progress value during monitoring; (3) value of plan progress during monitoring; (4) progress deviation; (5) cause of delay; and (6) management delay index and production delay index. The novelty of this study is that project delays have traditionally been held against the production party (contractor), whereas implementation delays have never been taken against the management party (consultant). However, using this method makes it evident who is responsible for a project delay, whether it comes from management (a consultant) or the manufacturing side (a contractor).
Doi: 10.28991/HIJ-2023-04-04-06
Full Text: PDF |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T21:59:01Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-58408aebeae74e05b156cc4e3fc70afc |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2723-9535 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T21:59:01Z |
| publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
| publisher | Ital Publication |
| record_format | Article |
| series | HighTech and Innovation Journal |
| spelling | doaj.art-58408aebeae74e05b156cc4e3fc70afc2024-02-24T06:59:12ZengItal PublicationHighTech and Innovation Journal2723-95352023-12-014476877810.28991/HIJ-2023-04-04-06153Reinventing Formulas for Construction Project Delay Index Due to Management and ProductionPutri Lynna A. Luthan0Nathanael Sitanggang1Syafriandi Syafriandi2Department of Construction Management, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Medan, Medan 20221,Department of Building Engineering Science, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Medan, Medan 20221,Head of Project Scheduling Experts Indonesia (PAPPI), Padang 25133,The objective of this study is to construct a precise formula for the management and production delay indicators that are integrated into Ms. Project's dashboard. Two simulation techniques, such as the manual formula computation and calculation integrated into the Ms. Project dashboard, were employed. Due to management and the production team's tardiness, the data were obtained through trial-and-error methods. Excel was used to analyze the data, and Ms. Project was used to enter the calculations. The research showed that the Ms. Project dashboard formula gave more detailed information about the construction project, including: (1) contract value; (2) actual progress value during monitoring; (3) value of plan progress during monitoring; (4) progress deviation; (5) cause of delay; and (6) management delay index and production delay index. The novelty of this study is that project delays have traditionally been held against the production party (contractor), whereas implementation delays have never been taken against the management party (consultant). However, using this method makes it evident who is responsible for a project delay, whether it comes from management (a consultant) or the manufacturing side (a contractor). Doi: 10.28991/HIJ-2023-04-04-06 Full Text: PDFhttps://hightechjournal.org/index.php/HIJ/article/view/548formulaindex of delaymanagementproduction. |
| spellingShingle | Putri Lynna A. Luthan Nathanael Sitanggang Syafriandi Syafriandi Reinventing Formulas for Construction Project Delay Index Due to Management and Production HighTech and Innovation Journal formula index of delay management production. |
| title | Reinventing Formulas for Construction Project Delay Index Due to Management and Production |
| title_full | Reinventing Formulas for Construction Project Delay Index Due to Management and Production |
| title_fullStr | Reinventing Formulas for Construction Project Delay Index Due to Management and Production |
| title_full_unstemmed | Reinventing Formulas for Construction Project Delay Index Due to Management and Production |
| title_short | Reinventing Formulas for Construction Project Delay Index Due to Management and Production |
| title_sort | reinventing formulas for construction project delay index due to management and production |
| topic | formula index of delay management production. |
| url | https://hightechjournal.org/index.php/HIJ/article/view/548 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT putrilynnaaluthan reinventingformulasforconstructionprojectdelayindexduetomanagementandproduction AT nathanaelsitanggang reinventingformulasforconstructionprojectdelayindexduetomanagementandproduction AT syafriandisyafriandi reinventingformulasforconstructionprojectdelayindexduetomanagementandproduction |