Heteronormative biases and distinctive experiences with prostate cancer among men who have sex with men: a qualitative focus group study

Abstract Background Men who have sex with men (MSM) face many challenges and biases in healthcare. Within urology there is a need to better understand how prostate cancer impacts MSM given the unique ways in which side effects that accompany treatment may affect this population. The goal of this stu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Evan Panken, Noah Frydenlund, Neil Mistry, Rahul Prabhu, Jeffrey Wong, Shilajit Kundu, David Victorson, Channa Amarasekera
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-01-01
Series:BMC Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01398-0
_version_ 1827388133010833408
author Evan Panken
Noah Frydenlund
Neil Mistry
Rahul Prabhu
Jeffrey Wong
Shilajit Kundu
David Victorson
Channa Amarasekera
author_facet Evan Panken
Noah Frydenlund
Neil Mistry
Rahul Prabhu
Jeffrey Wong
Shilajit Kundu
David Victorson
Channa Amarasekera
author_sort Evan Panken
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Men who have sex with men (MSM) face many challenges and biases in healthcare. Within urology there is a need to better understand how prostate cancer impacts MSM given the unique ways in which side effects that accompany treatment may affect this population. The goal of this study is to explore the experience of MSM with prostate cancer to advance the existing literature in this area and inform implementation and delivery of clinical practice and policy guidelines. Methods Four focus groups were conducted with a semi-structured interview guide. Using a phenomenological qualitative approach consistent with grounded theory [1] and naturalistic inquiry principles we sought to better understand the direct experiences of MSM with prostate cancer. Audio transcriptions were thematically analyzed to identify themes that impact MSM throughout their prostate cancer journey. An iterative, team-wide classification process was used to identify, organize, and group common codes into higher-order categories and themes. Results Patient’s choice of provider and their interactions with the healthcare system were strongly impacted by their sexual identities. Participants commented on navigating the heteronormative healthcare environment and the impact of assumptions they encountered. MSM experienced the sexual side effects of prostate cancer treatment in unique ways. Issues with erectile dysfunction and ejaculatory dysfunction had significant impacts on patient’s sexual experience, with some describing being forced to explore new modes of sexual expression. Anejaculation was a theme that was distressing for many participants. The emotional impact of a prostate cancer diagnosis was significant in the men interviewed. Common themes included loss of identity and fear for future relationships. Conclusions MSM have unique concerns after prostate cancer treatment that differ from men who don’t identify as MSM. It is critical that providers familiarize themselves with the concerns of this patient population regarding prostate cancer treatment. An important step toward reducing heteronormative bias in prostate cancer care is to better understand the goals, identity, and sexual practices of MSM and to provide informed anticipatory guidance.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T16:13:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5848f96b11f143e5bf343f4a89cb61a0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2490
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T16:13:16Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Urology
spelling doaj.art-5848f96b11f143e5bf343f4a89cb61a02024-01-07T12:48:50ZengBMCBMC Urology1471-24902024-01-0124111010.1186/s12894-023-01398-0Heteronormative biases and distinctive experiences with prostate cancer among men who have sex with men: a qualitative focus group studyEvan Panken0Noah Frydenlund1Neil Mistry2Rahul Prabhu3Jeffrey Wong4Shilajit Kundu5David Victorson6Channa Amarasekera7Department of Urology, Northwestern UniversityDepartment of Urology, Northwestern UniversityDepartment of Urology, Northwestern UniversityDepartment of Urology, Northwestern UniversityUniversity of Colorado School of MedicineDepartment of Urology, Northwestern UniversityDepartment of Urology, Northwestern UniversityDepartment of Urology, Northwestern UniversityAbstract Background Men who have sex with men (MSM) face many challenges and biases in healthcare. Within urology there is a need to better understand how prostate cancer impacts MSM given the unique ways in which side effects that accompany treatment may affect this population. The goal of this study is to explore the experience of MSM with prostate cancer to advance the existing literature in this area and inform implementation and delivery of clinical practice and policy guidelines. Methods Four focus groups were conducted with a semi-structured interview guide. Using a phenomenological qualitative approach consistent with grounded theory [1] and naturalistic inquiry principles we sought to better understand the direct experiences of MSM with prostate cancer. Audio transcriptions were thematically analyzed to identify themes that impact MSM throughout their prostate cancer journey. An iterative, team-wide classification process was used to identify, organize, and group common codes into higher-order categories and themes. Results Patient’s choice of provider and their interactions with the healthcare system were strongly impacted by their sexual identities. Participants commented on navigating the heteronormative healthcare environment and the impact of assumptions they encountered. MSM experienced the sexual side effects of prostate cancer treatment in unique ways. Issues with erectile dysfunction and ejaculatory dysfunction had significant impacts on patient’s sexual experience, with some describing being forced to explore new modes of sexual expression. Anejaculation was a theme that was distressing for many participants. The emotional impact of a prostate cancer diagnosis was significant in the men interviewed. Common themes included loss of identity and fear for future relationships. Conclusions MSM have unique concerns after prostate cancer treatment that differ from men who don’t identify as MSM. It is critical that providers familiarize themselves with the concerns of this patient population regarding prostate cancer treatment. An important step toward reducing heteronormative bias in prostate cancer care is to better understand the goals, identity, and sexual practices of MSM and to provide informed anticipatory guidance.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01398-0Men who have sex with menQualitativeFocus groupsProstate cancerSexual dysfunctionEjaculatory dysfunction
spellingShingle Evan Panken
Noah Frydenlund
Neil Mistry
Rahul Prabhu
Jeffrey Wong
Shilajit Kundu
David Victorson
Channa Amarasekera
Heteronormative biases and distinctive experiences with prostate cancer among men who have sex with men: a qualitative focus group study
BMC Urology
Men who have sex with men
Qualitative
Focus groups
Prostate cancer
Sexual dysfunction
Ejaculatory dysfunction
title Heteronormative biases and distinctive experiences with prostate cancer among men who have sex with men: a qualitative focus group study
title_full Heteronormative biases and distinctive experiences with prostate cancer among men who have sex with men: a qualitative focus group study
title_fullStr Heteronormative biases and distinctive experiences with prostate cancer among men who have sex with men: a qualitative focus group study
title_full_unstemmed Heteronormative biases and distinctive experiences with prostate cancer among men who have sex with men: a qualitative focus group study
title_short Heteronormative biases and distinctive experiences with prostate cancer among men who have sex with men: a qualitative focus group study
title_sort heteronormative biases and distinctive experiences with prostate cancer among men who have sex with men a qualitative focus group study
topic Men who have sex with men
Qualitative
Focus groups
Prostate cancer
Sexual dysfunction
Ejaculatory dysfunction
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01398-0
work_keys_str_mv AT evanpanken heteronormativebiasesanddistinctiveexperienceswithprostatecanceramongmenwhohavesexwithmenaqualitativefocusgroupstudy
AT noahfrydenlund heteronormativebiasesanddistinctiveexperienceswithprostatecanceramongmenwhohavesexwithmenaqualitativefocusgroupstudy
AT neilmistry heteronormativebiasesanddistinctiveexperienceswithprostatecanceramongmenwhohavesexwithmenaqualitativefocusgroupstudy
AT rahulprabhu heteronormativebiasesanddistinctiveexperienceswithprostatecanceramongmenwhohavesexwithmenaqualitativefocusgroupstudy
AT jeffreywong heteronormativebiasesanddistinctiveexperienceswithprostatecanceramongmenwhohavesexwithmenaqualitativefocusgroupstudy
AT shilajitkundu heteronormativebiasesanddistinctiveexperienceswithprostatecanceramongmenwhohavesexwithmenaqualitativefocusgroupstudy
AT davidvictorson heteronormativebiasesanddistinctiveexperienceswithprostatecanceramongmenwhohavesexwithmenaqualitativefocusgroupstudy
AT channaamarasekera heteronormativebiasesanddistinctiveexperienceswithprostatecanceramongmenwhohavesexwithmenaqualitativefocusgroupstudy