Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook
Abstract Background Assessing the risk of bias (RoB) in included studies is one of the key methodological aspects of systematic reviews. Cochrane systematic reviews appraise RoB of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with the Cochrane RoB tool. Detailed instructions for using the Cochrane RoB tool a...
Main Authors: | Ognjen Barcot, Matija Boric, Tina Poklepovic Pericic, Marija Cavar, Svjetlana Dosenovic, Ivana Vuka, Livia Puljak |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-08-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-019-0804-y |
Similar Items
-
Adequacy of risk of bias assessment in surgical vs non-surgical trials in Cochrane reviews: a methodological study
by: Ognjen Barcot, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01) -
Assessing the risk of performance and detection bias in Cochrane reviews as a joint domain is less accurate compared to two separate domains
by: Ognjen Barcot, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01) -
The judgement of biases included in the category “other bias” in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic survey
by: Andrija Babic, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01) -
Assessments of attrition bias in Cochrane systematic reviews are highly inconsistent and thus hindering trial comparability
by: Andrija Babic, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01) -
Assessing the magnitude of changes from protocol to publication—a survey on Cochrane and non-Cochrane Systematic Reviews
by: Maximilian Siebert, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01)