Mitigating Ammonia and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Stored Pig Slurry Using Chemical Additives and Biochars

Slurry storage is a significant source of NH<sub>3</sub> and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The aim of this laboratory study was to assess the effects of different chemical additives and biochars on the emissions of NH<sub>3</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O, CO<sub>2&...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: José L. S. Pereira, Adelaide Perdigão, Francisco Marques, Dulcineia F. Wessel, Henrique Trindade, David Fangueiro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-11-01
Series:Agronomy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/11/2744
_version_ 1797469408704069632
author José L. S. Pereira
Adelaide Perdigão
Francisco Marques
Dulcineia F. Wessel
Henrique Trindade
David Fangueiro
author_facet José L. S. Pereira
Adelaide Perdigão
Francisco Marques
Dulcineia F. Wessel
Henrique Trindade
David Fangueiro
author_sort José L. S. Pereira
collection DOAJ
description Slurry storage is a significant source of NH<sub>3</sub> and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The aim of this laboratory study was to assess the effects of different chemical additives and biochars on the emissions of NH<sub>3</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O, CO<sub>2</sub>, and CH<sub>4</sub> during the short-term storage of pig slurry. The experiment was performed using Kilner jars filled with raw slurry as control and six treatment additives (5% <i>w</i>/<i>w</i>): acidified slurry, alkalinized slurry, neutralized slurry, agroforestry biochar, cardoon biochar, and elderberry biochar. The gas emissions were measured for 30 days, and the composition of the slurries was determined. During short-term storage, the results of this laboratory study indicated that the NH<sub>3</sub> emissions were reduced by 58% by acidification and by 20% by the biochars (Agroforestry, Cardoon, and Elderberry treatments), while neutralization reduced this loss by only 12%. Nitrous oxide emissions were not reduced by the chemical additives (Acidified, Alkalinized, and Neutralized treatments), while this loss was increased by 12% by the biochars. Carbon dioxide, CH<sub>4</sub>, and global warming potential emissions were not affected by the chemical additives and biochars. Furthermore, the absence of differences between the biochars may be related to their similar composition. Regarding the influence of the studied additives on NH<sub>3</sub> losses, it can be concluded that acidification was the best mitigation measure and the biochars were quite similar due to their composition. Furthermore, neutralization had the advantage of sanitizing the slurry, but only had a mild impact on NH<sub>3</sub> preservation.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T19:21:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5883869f75df4633be919406966c04a9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4395
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T19:21:00Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Agronomy
spelling doaj.art-5883869f75df4633be919406966c04a92023-11-24T03:21:36ZengMDPI AGAgronomy2073-43952022-11-011211274410.3390/agronomy12112744Mitigating Ammonia and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Stored Pig Slurry Using Chemical Additives and BiocharsJosé L. S. Pereira0Adelaide Perdigão1Francisco Marques2Dulcineia F. Wessel3Henrique Trindade4David Fangueiro5Agrarian School of Viseu, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, Quinta da Alagoa, 3500-606 Viseu, PortugalAgrarian School of Viseu, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, Quinta da Alagoa, 3500-606 Viseu, PortugalAgrarian School of Viseu, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, Quinta da Alagoa, 3500-606 Viseu, PortugalAgrarian School of Viseu, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, Quinta da Alagoa, 3500-606 Viseu, PortugalCentre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), Inov4Agro, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, PortugalLEAF, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisboa, PortugalSlurry storage is a significant source of NH<sub>3</sub> and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The aim of this laboratory study was to assess the effects of different chemical additives and biochars on the emissions of NH<sub>3</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O, CO<sub>2</sub>, and CH<sub>4</sub> during the short-term storage of pig slurry. The experiment was performed using Kilner jars filled with raw slurry as control and six treatment additives (5% <i>w</i>/<i>w</i>): acidified slurry, alkalinized slurry, neutralized slurry, agroforestry biochar, cardoon biochar, and elderberry biochar. The gas emissions were measured for 30 days, and the composition of the slurries was determined. During short-term storage, the results of this laboratory study indicated that the NH<sub>3</sub> emissions were reduced by 58% by acidification and by 20% by the biochars (Agroforestry, Cardoon, and Elderberry treatments), while neutralization reduced this loss by only 12%. Nitrous oxide emissions were not reduced by the chemical additives (Acidified, Alkalinized, and Neutralized treatments), while this loss was increased by 12% by the biochars. Carbon dioxide, CH<sub>4</sub>, and global warming potential emissions were not affected by the chemical additives and biochars. Furthermore, the absence of differences between the biochars may be related to their similar composition. Regarding the influence of the studied additives on NH<sub>3</sub> losses, it can be concluded that acidification was the best mitigation measure and the biochars were quite similar due to their composition. Furthermore, neutralization had the advantage of sanitizing the slurry, but only had a mild impact on NH<sub>3</sub> preservation.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/11/2744animal slurrybiocharchemical additivegaseous emissionsmitigation measureslurry additive
spellingShingle José L. S. Pereira
Adelaide Perdigão
Francisco Marques
Dulcineia F. Wessel
Henrique Trindade
David Fangueiro
Mitigating Ammonia and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Stored Pig Slurry Using Chemical Additives and Biochars
Agronomy
animal slurry
biochar
chemical additive
gaseous emissions
mitigation measure
slurry additive
title Mitigating Ammonia and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Stored Pig Slurry Using Chemical Additives and Biochars
title_full Mitigating Ammonia and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Stored Pig Slurry Using Chemical Additives and Biochars
title_fullStr Mitigating Ammonia and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Stored Pig Slurry Using Chemical Additives and Biochars
title_full_unstemmed Mitigating Ammonia and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Stored Pig Slurry Using Chemical Additives and Biochars
title_short Mitigating Ammonia and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Stored Pig Slurry Using Chemical Additives and Biochars
title_sort mitigating ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from stored pig slurry using chemical additives and biochars
topic animal slurry
biochar
chemical additive
gaseous emissions
mitigation measure
slurry additive
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/11/2744
work_keys_str_mv AT joselspereira mitigatingammoniaandgreenhousegasemissionsfromstoredpigslurryusingchemicaladditivesandbiochars
AT adelaideperdigao mitigatingammoniaandgreenhousegasemissionsfromstoredpigslurryusingchemicaladditivesandbiochars
AT franciscomarques mitigatingammoniaandgreenhousegasemissionsfromstoredpigslurryusingchemicaladditivesandbiochars
AT dulcineiafwessel mitigatingammoniaandgreenhousegasemissionsfromstoredpigslurryusingchemicaladditivesandbiochars
AT henriquetrindade mitigatingammoniaandgreenhousegasemissionsfromstoredpigslurryusingchemicaladditivesandbiochars
AT davidfangueiro mitigatingammoniaandgreenhousegasemissionsfromstoredpigslurryusingchemicaladditivesandbiochars