Physician agreement on the diagnosis of sepsis in the intensive care unit: estimation of concordance and analysis of underlying factors in a multicenter cohort

Abstract Background Differentiating sepsis from the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in critical care patients is challenging, especially before serious organ damage is evident, and with variable clinical presentations of patients and variable training and experience of attending physi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bert K. Lopansri, Russell R. Miller III, John P. Burke, Mitchell Levy, Steven Opal, Richard E. Rothman, Franco R. D’Alessio, Venkataramana K. Sidhaye, Robert Balk, Jared A. Greenberg, Mark Yoder, Gourang P. Patel, Emily Gilbert, Majid Afshar, Jorge P. Parada, Greg S. Martin, Annette M. Esper, Jordan A. Kempker, Mangala Narasimhan, Adey Tsegaye, Stella Hahn, Paul Mayo, Leo McHugh, Antony Rapisarda, Dayle Sampson, Roslyn A. Brandon, Therese A. Seldon, Thomas D. Yager, Richard B. Brandon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-02-01
Series:Journal of Intensive Care
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40560-019-0368-2
_version_ 1830359219435470848
author Bert K. Lopansri
Russell R. Miller III
John P. Burke
Mitchell Levy
Steven Opal
Richard E. Rothman
Franco R. D’Alessio
Venkataramana K. Sidhaye
Robert Balk
Jared A. Greenberg
Mark Yoder
Gourang P. Patel
Emily Gilbert
Majid Afshar
Jorge P. Parada
Greg S. Martin
Annette M. Esper
Jordan A. Kempker
Mangala Narasimhan
Adey Tsegaye
Stella Hahn
Paul Mayo
Leo McHugh
Antony Rapisarda
Dayle Sampson
Roslyn A. Brandon
Therese A. Seldon
Thomas D. Yager
Richard B. Brandon
author_facet Bert K. Lopansri
Russell R. Miller III
John P. Burke
Mitchell Levy
Steven Opal
Richard E. Rothman
Franco R. D’Alessio
Venkataramana K. Sidhaye
Robert Balk
Jared A. Greenberg
Mark Yoder
Gourang P. Patel
Emily Gilbert
Majid Afshar
Jorge P. Parada
Greg S. Martin
Annette M. Esper
Jordan A. Kempker
Mangala Narasimhan
Adey Tsegaye
Stella Hahn
Paul Mayo
Leo McHugh
Antony Rapisarda
Dayle Sampson
Roslyn A. Brandon
Therese A. Seldon
Thomas D. Yager
Richard B. Brandon
author_sort Bert K. Lopansri
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Differentiating sepsis from the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in critical care patients is challenging, especially before serious organ damage is evident, and with variable clinical presentations of patients and variable training and experience of attending physicians. Our objective was to describe and quantify physician agreement in diagnosing SIRS or sepsis in critical care patients as a function of available clinical information, infection site, and hospital setting. Methods We conducted a post hoc analysis of previously collected data from a prospective, observational trial (N = 249 subjects) in intensive care units at seven US hospitals, in which physicians at different stages of patient care were asked to make diagnostic calls of either SIRS, sepsis, or indeterminate, based on varying amounts of available clinical information (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02127502). The overall percent agreement and the free-marginal, inter-observer agreement statistic kappa (κ free) were used to quantify agreement between evaluators (attending physicians, site investigators, external expert panelists). Logistic regression and machine learning techniques were used to search for significant variables that could explain heterogeneity within the indeterminate and SIRS patient subgroups. Results Free-marginal kappa decreased between the initial impression of the attending physician and (1) the initial impression of the site investigator (κ free 0.68), (2) the consensus discharge diagnosis of the site investigators (κ free 0.62), and (3) the consensus diagnosis of the external expert panel (κ free 0.58). In contrast, agreement was greatest between the consensus discharge impression of site investigators and the consensus diagnosis of the external expert panel (κ free 0.79). When stratified by infection site, κ free for agreement between initial and later diagnoses had a mean value + 0.24 (range − 0.29 to + 0.39) for respiratory infections, compared to + 0.70 (range + 0.42 to + 0.88) for abdominal + urinary + other infections. Bioinformatics analysis failed to clearly resolve the indeterminate diagnoses and also failed to explain why 60% of SIRS patients were treated with antibiotics. Conclusions Considerable uncertainty surrounds the differential clinical diagnosis of sepsis vs. SIRS, especially before organ damage has become highly evident, and for patients presenting with respiratory clinical signs. Our findings underscore the need to provide physicians with accurate, timely diagnostic information in evaluating possible sepsis.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T02:55:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-58b777a2daf346e396ec3874647a0467
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2052-0492
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T02:55:39Z
publishDate 2019-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Intensive Care
spelling doaj.art-58b777a2daf346e396ec3874647a04672022-12-21T19:55:55ZengBMCJournal of Intensive Care2052-04922019-02-017111710.1186/s40560-019-0368-2Physician agreement on the diagnosis of sepsis in the intensive care unit: estimation of concordance and analysis of underlying factors in a multicenter cohortBert K. Lopansri0Russell R. Miller III1John P. Burke2Mitchell Levy3Steven Opal4Richard E. Rothman5Franco R. D’Alessio6Venkataramana K. Sidhaye7Robert Balk8Jared A. Greenberg9Mark Yoder10Gourang P. Patel11Emily Gilbert12Majid Afshar13Jorge P. Parada14Greg S. Martin15Annette M. Esper16Jordan A. Kempker17Mangala Narasimhan18Adey Tsegaye19Stella Hahn20Paul Mayo21Leo McHugh22Antony Rapisarda23Dayle Sampson24Roslyn A. Brandon25Therese A. Seldon26Thomas D. Yager27Richard B. Brandon28Division of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Epidemiology, Intermountain Medical CenterDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Intermountain Medical CenterDivision of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Epidemiology, Intermountain Medical CenterBrown UniversityBrown UniversityJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineRush Medical College and Rush University Medical CenterRush Medical College and Rush University Medical CenterRush Medical College and Rush University Medical CenterRush Medical College and Rush University Medical CenterLoyola University Medical CenterLoyola University Medical CenterLoyola University Medical CenterGrady Memorial Hospital and Emory University School of MedicineGrady Memorial Hospital and Emory University School of MedicineGrady Memorial Hospital and Emory University School of MedicineNorthwell HealthcareNorthwell HealthcareNorthwell HealthcareNorthwell HealthcareImmunexpress IncImmunexpress IncImmunexpress IncImmunexpress IncImmunexpress IncImmunexpress IncImmunexpress IncAbstract Background Differentiating sepsis from the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in critical care patients is challenging, especially before serious organ damage is evident, and with variable clinical presentations of patients and variable training and experience of attending physicians. Our objective was to describe and quantify physician agreement in diagnosing SIRS or sepsis in critical care patients as a function of available clinical information, infection site, and hospital setting. Methods We conducted a post hoc analysis of previously collected data from a prospective, observational trial (N = 249 subjects) in intensive care units at seven US hospitals, in which physicians at different stages of patient care were asked to make diagnostic calls of either SIRS, sepsis, or indeterminate, based on varying amounts of available clinical information (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02127502). The overall percent agreement and the free-marginal, inter-observer agreement statistic kappa (κ free) were used to quantify agreement between evaluators (attending physicians, site investigators, external expert panelists). Logistic regression and machine learning techniques were used to search for significant variables that could explain heterogeneity within the indeterminate and SIRS patient subgroups. Results Free-marginal kappa decreased between the initial impression of the attending physician and (1) the initial impression of the site investigator (κ free 0.68), (2) the consensus discharge diagnosis of the site investigators (κ free 0.62), and (3) the consensus diagnosis of the external expert panel (κ free 0.58). In contrast, agreement was greatest between the consensus discharge impression of site investigators and the consensus diagnosis of the external expert panel (κ free 0.79). When stratified by infection site, κ free for agreement between initial and later diagnoses had a mean value + 0.24 (range − 0.29 to + 0.39) for respiratory infections, compared to + 0.70 (range + 0.42 to + 0.88) for abdominal + urinary + other infections. Bioinformatics analysis failed to clearly resolve the indeterminate diagnoses and also failed to explain why 60% of SIRS patients were treated with antibiotics. Conclusions Considerable uncertainty surrounds the differential clinical diagnosis of sepsis vs. SIRS, especially before organ damage has become highly evident, and for patients presenting with respiratory clinical signs. Our findings underscore the need to provide physicians with accurate, timely diagnostic information in evaluating possible sepsis.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40560-019-0368-2SepsisDiagnosisInter-observer agreementIntensive care
spellingShingle Bert K. Lopansri
Russell R. Miller III
John P. Burke
Mitchell Levy
Steven Opal
Richard E. Rothman
Franco R. D’Alessio
Venkataramana K. Sidhaye
Robert Balk
Jared A. Greenberg
Mark Yoder
Gourang P. Patel
Emily Gilbert
Majid Afshar
Jorge P. Parada
Greg S. Martin
Annette M. Esper
Jordan A. Kempker
Mangala Narasimhan
Adey Tsegaye
Stella Hahn
Paul Mayo
Leo McHugh
Antony Rapisarda
Dayle Sampson
Roslyn A. Brandon
Therese A. Seldon
Thomas D. Yager
Richard B. Brandon
Physician agreement on the diagnosis of sepsis in the intensive care unit: estimation of concordance and analysis of underlying factors in a multicenter cohort
Journal of Intensive Care
Sepsis
Diagnosis
Inter-observer agreement
Intensive care
title Physician agreement on the diagnosis of sepsis in the intensive care unit: estimation of concordance and analysis of underlying factors in a multicenter cohort
title_full Physician agreement on the diagnosis of sepsis in the intensive care unit: estimation of concordance and analysis of underlying factors in a multicenter cohort
title_fullStr Physician agreement on the diagnosis of sepsis in the intensive care unit: estimation of concordance and analysis of underlying factors in a multicenter cohort
title_full_unstemmed Physician agreement on the diagnosis of sepsis in the intensive care unit: estimation of concordance and analysis of underlying factors in a multicenter cohort
title_short Physician agreement on the diagnosis of sepsis in the intensive care unit: estimation of concordance and analysis of underlying factors in a multicenter cohort
title_sort physician agreement on the diagnosis of sepsis in the intensive care unit estimation of concordance and analysis of underlying factors in a multicenter cohort
topic Sepsis
Diagnosis
Inter-observer agreement
Intensive care
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40560-019-0368-2
work_keys_str_mv AT bertklopansri physicianagreementonthediagnosisofsepsisintheintensivecareunitestimationofconcordanceandanalysisofunderlyingfactorsinamulticentercohort
AT russellrmilleriii physicianagreementonthediagnosisofsepsisintheintensivecareunitestimationofconcordanceandanalysisofunderlyingfactorsinamulticentercohort
AT johnpburke physicianagreementonthediagnosisofsepsisintheintensivecareunitestimationofconcordanceandanalysisofunderlyingfactorsinamulticentercohort
AT mitchelllevy physicianagreementonthediagnosisofsepsisintheintensivecareunitestimationofconcordanceandanalysisofunderlyingfactorsinamulticentercohort
AT stevenopal physicianagreementonthediagnosisofsepsisintheintensivecareunitestimationofconcordanceandanalysisofunderlyingfactorsinamulticentercohort
AT richarderothman physicianagreementonthediagnosisofsepsisintheintensivecareunitestimationofconcordanceandanalysisofunderlyingfactorsinamulticentercohort
AT francordalessio physicianagreementonthediagnosisofsepsisintheintensivecareunitestimationofconcordanceandanalysisofunderlyingfactorsinamulticentercohort
AT venkataramanaksidhaye physicianagreementonthediagnosisofsepsisintheintensivecareunitestimationofconcordanceandanalysisofunderlyingfactorsinamulticentercohort
AT robertbalk physicianagreementonthediagnosisofsepsisintheintensivecareunitestimationofconcordanceandanalysisofunderlyingfactorsinamulticentercohort
AT jaredagreenberg physicianagreementonthediagnosisofsepsisintheintensivecareunitestimationofconcordanceandanalysisofunderlyingfactorsinamulticentercohort
AT markyoder physicianagreementonthediagnosisofsepsisintheintensivecareunitestimationofconcordanceandanalysisofunderlyingfactorsinamulticentercohort
AT gourangppatel physicianagreementonthediagnosisofsepsisintheintensivecareunitestimationofconcordanceandanalysisofunderlyingfactorsinamulticentercohort
AT emilygilbert physicianagreementonthediagnosisofsepsisintheintensivecareunitestimationofconcordanceandanalysisofunderlyingfactorsinamulticentercohort
AT majidafshar physicianagreementonthediagnosisofsepsisintheintensivecareunitestimationofconcordanceandanalysisofunderlyingfactorsinamulticentercohort
AT jorgepparada physicianagreementonthediagnosisofsepsisintheintensivecareunitestimationofconcordanceandanalysisofunderlyingfactorsinamulticentercohort
AT gregsmartin physicianagreementonthediagnosisofsepsisintheintensivecareunitestimationofconcordanceandanalysisofunderlyingfactorsinamulticentercohort
AT annettemesper physicianagreementonthediagnosisofsepsisintheintensivecareunitestimationofconcordanceandanalysisofunderlyingfactorsinamulticentercohort
AT jordanakempker physicianagreementonthediagnosisofsepsisintheintensivecareunitestimationofconcordanceandanalysisofunderlyingfactorsinamulticentercohort
AT mangalanarasimhan physicianagreementonthediagnosisofsepsisintheintensivecareunitestimationofconcordanceandanalysisofunderlyingfactorsinamulticentercohort
AT adeytsegaye physicianagreementonthediagnosisofsepsisintheintensivecareunitestimationofconcordanceandanalysisofunderlyingfactorsinamulticentercohort
AT stellahahn physicianagreementonthediagnosisofsepsisintheintensivecareunitestimationofconcordanceandanalysisofunderlyingfactorsinamulticentercohort
AT paulmayo physicianagreementonthediagnosisofsepsisintheintensivecareunitestimationofconcordanceandanalysisofunderlyingfactorsinamulticentercohort
AT leomchugh physicianagreementonthediagnosisofsepsisintheintensivecareunitestimationofconcordanceandanalysisofunderlyingfactorsinamulticentercohort
AT antonyrapisarda physicianagreementonthediagnosisofsepsisintheintensivecareunitestimationofconcordanceandanalysisofunderlyingfactorsinamulticentercohort
AT daylesampson physicianagreementonthediagnosisofsepsisintheintensivecareunitestimationofconcordanceandanalysisofunderlyingfactorsinamulticentercohort
AT roslynabrandon physicianagreementonthediagnosisofsepsisintheintensivecareunitestimationofconcordanceandanalysisofunderlyingfactorsinamulticentercohort
AT thereseaseldon physicianagreementonthediagnosisofsepsisintheintensivecareunitestimationofconcordanceandanalysisofunderlyingfactorsinamulticentercohort
AT thomasdyager physicianagreementonthediagnosisofsepsisintheintensivecareunitestimationofconcordanceandanalysisofunderlyingfactorsinamulticentercohort
AT richardbbrandon physicianagreementonthediagnosisofsepsisintheintensivecareunitestimationofconcordanceandanalysisofunderlyingfactorsinamulticentercohort