Construction of educational proficiency in academia: peer review of educational merits in academic recruitment in Sweden
Little is known about the nature of educational proficiency in evaluation practices in academia. This is unfortunate, since excellence in teaching is increasingly seen as significant for the prosperity of contemporary higher education institutions. This study explores the meaning ascribed to educati...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Education Inquiry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1843234 |
_version_ | 1818700277436383232 |
---|---|
author | Sara Levander |
author_facet | Sara Levander |
author_sort | Sara Levander |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Little is known about the nature of educational proficiency in evaluation practices in academia. This is unfortunate, since excellence in teaching is increasingly seen as significant for the prosperity of contemporary higher education institutions. This study explores the meaning ascribed to educational proficiency in the recruitment of academic teachers, and draws on data from a comprehensive research-intensive university in Sweden offering educational programmes within a broad range of scientific domains. The data consists of 100 evaluation reports derived from 54 appointments. A thematic analysis and an analysis of reviewers’ strategies of intertextuality are carried out. The findings show that (1) although qualitatively distinct aspects are attributed to educational proficiency, the principal meaning ascribed to it is the mere act and experience of teaching; and (2) reviewers draw on the application files using distinct textual strategies that have significant consequences for their construction of educational proficiency. These strategies involve referring to existing information in the file in different ways (quoting/listing, paraphrasing/summarising, commenting/assessing), stressing the absence of information in the file (wanting), and disregarding information in the file (withdrawing). Reviewers’ dominant use of paraphrasing or summarising as a strategy of intertextuality is consistent with educational proficiency primarily being conceptualised as a matter of quantity. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-17T15:02:23Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-58bd9f8d0bda4b90aab79261db5d6e06 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2000-4508 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-17T15:02:23Z |
publishDate | 2020-12-01 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
record_format | Article |
series | Education Inquiry |
spelling | doaj.art-58bd9f8d0bda4b90aab79261db5d6e062022-12-21T21:43:51ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEducation Inquiry2000-45082020-12-010011810.1080/20004508.2020.18432341843234Construction of educational proficiency in academia: peer review of educational merits in academic recruitment in SwedenSara Levander0Uppsala UniversityLittle is known about the nature of educational proficiency in evaluation practices in academia. This is unfortunate, since excellence in teaching is increasingly seen as significant for the prosperity of contemporary higher education institutions. This study explores the meaning ascribed to educational proficiency in the recruitment of academic teachers, and draws on data from a comprehensive research-intensive university in Sweden offering educational programmes within a broad range of scientific domains. The data consists of 100 evaluation reports derived from 54 appointments. A thematic analysis and an analysis of reviewers’ strategies of intertextuality are carried out. The findings show that (1) although qualitatively distinct aspects are attributed to educational proficiency, the principal meaning ascribed to it is the mere act and experience of teaching; and (2) reviewers draw on the application files using distinct textual strategies that have significant consequences for their construction of educational proficiency. These strategies involve referring to existing information in the file in different ways (quoting/listing, paraphrasing/summarising, commenting/assessing), stressing the absence of information in the file (wanting), and disregarding information in the file (withdrawing). Reviewers’ dominant use of paraphrasing or summarising as a strategy of intertextuality is consistent with educational proficiency primarily being conceptualised as a matter of quantity.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1843234academic recruitmentassessmenteducational proficiencyintertextualitypeer reviewteaching excellencetenure and promotion |
spellingShingle | Sara Levander Construction of educational proficiency in academia: peer review of educational merits in academic recruitment in Sweden Education Inquiry academic recruitment assessment educational proficiency intertextuality peer review teaching excellence tenure and promotion |
title | Construction of educational proficiency in academia: peer review of educational merits in academic recruitment in Sweden |
title_full | Construction of educational proficiency in academia: peer review of educational merits in academic recruitment in Sweden |
title_fullStr | Construction of educational proficiency in academia: peer review of educational merits in academic recruitment in Sweden |
title_full_unstemmed | Construction of educational proficiency in academia: peer review of educational merits in academic recruitment in Sweden |
title_short | Construction of educational proficiency in academia: peer review of educational merits in academic recruitment in Sweden |
title_sort | construction of educational proficiency in academia peer review of educational merits in academic recruitment in sweden |
topic | academic recruitment assessment educational proficiency intertextuality peer review teaching excellence tenure and promotion |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1843234 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saralevander constructionofeducationalproficiencyinacademiapeerreviewofeducationalmeritsinacademicrecruitmentinsweden |