Construction of educational proficiency in academia: peer review of educational merits in academic recruitment in Sweden

Little is known about the nature of educational proficiency in evaluation practices in academia. This is unfortunate, since excellence in teaching is increasingly seen as significant for the prosperity of contemporary higher education institutions. This study explores the meaning ascribed to educati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sara Levander
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-12-01
Series:Education Inquiry
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1843234
_version_ 1818700277436383232
author Sara Levander
author_facet Sara Levander
author_sort Sara Levander
collection DOAJ
description Little is known about the nature of educational proficiency in evaluation practices in academia. This is unfortunate, since excellence in teaching is increasingly seen as significant for the prosperity of contemporary higher education institutions. This study explores the meaning ascribed to educational proficiency in the recruitment of academic teachers, and draws on data from a comprehensive research-intensive university in Sweden offering educational programmes within a broad range of scientific domains. The data consists of 100 evaluation reports derived from 54 appointments. A thematic analysis and an analysis of reviewers’ strategies of intertextuality are carried out. The findings show that (1) although qualitatively distinct aspects are attributed to educational proficiency, the principal meaning ascribed to it is the mere act and experience of teaching; and (2) reviewers draw on the application files using distinct textual strategies that have significant consequences for their construction of educational proficiency. These strategies involve referring to existing information in the file in different ways (quoting/listing, paraphrasing/summarising, commenting/assessing), stressing the absence of information in the file (wanting), and disregarding information in the file (withdrawing). Reviewers’ dominant use of paraphrasing or summarising as a strategy of intertextuality is consistent with educational proficiency primarily being conceptualised as a matter of quantity.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T15:02:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-58bd9f8d0bda4b90aab79261db5d6e06
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2000-4508
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T15:02:23Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Education Inquiry
spelling doaj.art-58bd9f8d0bda4b90aab79261db5d6e062022-12-21T21:43:51ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEducation Inquiry2000-45082020-12-010011810.1080/20004508.2020.18432341843234Construction of educational proficiency in academia: peer review of educational merits in academic recruitment in SwedenSara Levander0Uppsala UniversityLittle is known about the nature of educational proficiency in evaluation practices in academia. This is unfortunate, since excellence in teaching is increasingly seen as significant for the prosperity of contemporary higher education institutions. This study explores the meaning ascribed to educational proficiency in the recruitment of academic teachers, and draws on data from a comprehensive research-intensive university in Sweden offering educational programmes within a broad range of scientific domains. The data consists of 100 evaluation reports derived from 54 appointments. A thematic analysis and an analysis of reviewers’ strategies of intertextuality are carried out. The findings show that (1) although qualitatively distinct aspects are attributed to educational proficiency, the principal meaning ascribed to it is the mere act and experience of teaching; and (2) reviewers draw on the application files using distinct textual strategies that have significant consequences for their construction of educational proficiency. These strategies involve referring to existing information in the file in different ways (quoting/listing, paraphrasing/summarising, commenting/assessing), stressing the absence of information in the file (wanting), and disregarding information in the file (withdrawing). Reviewers’ dominant use of paraphrasing or summarising as a strategy of intertextuality is consistent with educational proficiency primarily being conceptualised as a matter of quantity.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1843234academic recruitmentassessmenteducational proficiencyintertextualitypeer reviewteaching excellencetenure and promotion
spellingShingle Sara Levander
Construction of educational proficiency in academia: peer review of educational merits in academic recruitment in Sweden
Education Inquiry
academic recruitment
assessment
educational proficiency
intertextuality
peer review
teaching excellence
tenure and promotion
title Construction of educational proficiency in academia: peer review of educational merits in academic recruitment in Sweden
title_full Construction of educational proficiency in academia: peer review of educational merits in academic recruitment in Sweden
title_fullStr Construction of educational proficiency in academia: peer review of educational merits in academic recruitment in Sweden
title_full_unstemmed Construction of educational proficiency in academia: peer review of educational merits in academic recruitment in Sweden
title_short Construction of educational proficiency in academia: peer review of educational merits in academic recruitment in Sweden
title_sort construction of educational proficiency in academia peer review of educational merits in academic recruitment in sweden
topic academic recruitment
assessment
educational proficiency
intertextuality
peer review
teaching excellence
tenure and promotion
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1843234
work_keys_str_mv AT saralevander constructionofeducationalproficiencyinacademiapeerreviewofeducationalmeritsinacademicrecruitmentinsweden