Leadership Styles and Employees’ Job Performance at Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria

The study examined leadership styles and employees’ job performance in the Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria (FRIN). A total of 120 employees were chosen at random from among the 900 FRIN employees. Percentages, means, standard deviation and regression were used for the analysis. Results showe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kamilu Kolade Bolarinwa, Simeon Ajayi, Oyinade Adenuga, Elijah Obayelu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Agricultural Extension Society of Nigeria 2023-04-01
Series:Journal of Agricultural Extension
Subjects:
Online Access:http://aesonnigeria.org/ajm/index.php/jae/article/view/3382
_version_ 1797846546473025536
author Kamilu Kolade Bolarinwa
Simeon Ajayi
Oyinade Adenuga,
Elijah Obayelu
author_facet Kamilu Kolade Bolarinwa
Simeon Ajayi
Oyinade Adenuga,
Elijah Obayelu
author_sort Kamilu Kolade Bolarinwa
collection DOAJ
description The study examined leadership styles and employees’ job performance in the Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria (FRIN). A total of 120 employees were chosen at random from among the 900 FRIN employees. Percentages, means, standard deviation and regression were used for the analysis. Results showed that the majority (89.2%) of the employees displayed transformational leadership styles while 87.5% of the employees were democratic in their leadership styles. Indicators of autocratic leadership style include: superiors telling subordinates what to do, how to do it, and when they want it done ( =3.6). Indicators of laissez-faire leadership style include employees responsible for defining his or her own job ( = 3.01). Aspects of job performance influenced by the leadership styles of employees include: efficiently managing information and data (  = 4.10) and achieving deadlines ( = 4.10).  Transformational (78.5%) and democratic styles (54.3%) caused (variations in employee job performance. The organization made used of transformational and democratic leadership styles more than other leadership styles. The organisation should encourage the use of the two styles and mix it with other leadership styles where necessary in order to improve the administrative strength and achievement of organisational goals
first_indexed 2024-04-09T17:56:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-58bf5a45e2eb4d9e9c6aa7cc0d8c89a8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1119-944X
2408-6851
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T17:56:45Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher Agricultural Extension Society of Nigeria
record_format Article
series Journal of Agricultural Extension
spelling doaj.art-58bf5a45e2eb4d9e9c6aa7cc0d8c89a82023-04-14T16:19:21ZengAgricultural Extension Society of NigeriaJournal of Agricultural Extension1119-944X2408-68512023-04-01272Leadership Styles and Employees’ Job Performance at Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria Kamilu Kolade Bolarinwa0Simeon AjayiOyinade Adenuga, 1Elijah Obayelu2Federal University of Agriculture AbeokutaDepartment of Agricultural Administration Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta Ogun State NigeriaDepartment of Agricultural Economic and Farm Management Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta Ogun State Nigeria The study examined leadership styles and employees’ job performance in the Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria (FRIN). A total of 120 employees were chosen at random from among the 900 FRIN employees. Percentages, means, standard deviation and regression were used for the analysis. Results showed that the majority (89.2%) of the employees displayed transformational leadership styles while 87.5% of the employees were democratic in their leadership styles. Indicators of autocratic leadership style include: superiors telling subordinates what to do, how to do it, and when they want it done ( =3.6). Indicators of laissez-faire leadership style include employees responsible for defining his or her own job ( = 3.01). Aspects of job performance influenced by the leadership styles of employees include: efficiently managing information and data (  = 4.10) and achieving deadlines ( = 4.10).  Transformational (78.5%) and democratic styles (54.3%) caused (variations in employee job performance. The organization made used of transformational and democratic leadership styles more than other leadership styles. The organisation should encourage the use of the two styles and mix it with other leadership styles where necessary in order to improve the administrative strength and achievement of organisational goals http://aesonnigeria.org/ajm/index.php/jae/article/view/3382Leadership styleemployeejob performance
spellingShingle Kamilu Kolade Bolarinwa
Simeon Ajayi
Oyinade Adenuga,
Elijah Obayelu
Leadership Styles and Employees’ Job Performance at Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria
Journal of Agricultural Extension
Leadership style
employee
job performance
title Leadership Styles and Employees’ Job Performance at Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria
title_full Leadership Styles and Employees’ Job Performance at Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria
title_fullStr Leadership Styles and Employees’ Job Performance at Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria
title_full_unstemmed Leadership Styles and Employees’ Job Performance at Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria
title_short Leadership Styles and Employees’ Job Performance at Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria
title_sort leadership styles and employees job performance at forestry research institute of nigeria
topic Leadership style
employee
job performance
url http://aesonnigeria.org/ajm/index.php/jae/article/view/3382
work_keys_str_mv AT kamilukoladebolarinwa leadershipstylesandemployeesjobperformanceatforestryresearchinstituteofnigeria
AT simeonajayi leadershipstylesandemployeesjobperformanceatforestryresearchinstituteofnigeria
AT oyinadeadenuga leadershipstylesandemployeesjobperformanceatforestryresearchinstituteofnigeria
AT elijahobayelu leadershipstylesandemployeesjobperformanceatforestryresearchinstituteofnigeria