Comparison of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Devices in Aortic Stenosis: A Network Meta-Analysis of 42,105 Patients

<i>Background:</i> In recent years, trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as an excellent alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Currently, there are several approved devices on the market, yet comparisons among them are scarce. We aimed to compare...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ala Abu Dogosh, Ahlam Adawi, Aref El Nasasra, Carlos Cafri, Orit Barrett, Gal Tsaban, Rami Barashi, Edward Koifman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-09-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/18/5299
_version_ 1797486695400079360
author Ala Abu Dogosh
Ahlam Adawi
Aref El Nasasra
Carlos Cafri
Orit Barrett
Gal Tsaban
Rami Barashi
Edward Koifman
author_facet Ala Abu Dogosh
Ahlam Adawi
Aref El Nasasra
Carlos Cafri
Orit Barrett
Gal Tsaban
Rami Barashi
Edward Koifman
author_sort Ala Abu Dogosh
collection DOAJ
description <i>Background:</i> In recent years, trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as an excellent alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Currently, there are several approved devices on the market, yet comparisons among them are scarce. We aimed to compare the various devices via a network meta-analysis. <i>Methods:</i> We performed a network meta-analysis including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity-matched studies that provide comparisons of either a single TAVI with SAVR or two different TAVI devices and report clinical outcomes. <i>Results:</i> We included 12 RCT and 13 propensity-matched studies comprising 42,105 patients, among whom 27,134 underwent TAVI using various valve systems (Sapien & Sapien XT, Sapien 3, Corvalve, Evolut & Evolut Pro, Acurate Neo, Portico). The mean follow-up time was 23.4 months. Sapien 3 was superior over SAVR in the reduction of all-cause mortality (OR = 0.53; 95%CrI 0.31–0.91), while no significant difference existed between other devices and SAVR. Aortic regurgitation was more frequent among TAVI devices compared to SAVR. There was no significant difference between the various THVs and SAVR in cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, NYHA class III-IV, and endocarditis. <i>Conclusions:</i> Newer generation TAVI devices, especially Sapien 3 and Evolut R/Pro are associated with improved outcomes compared to SAVR and other devices of the older generation.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T23:36:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-58c78e931a9b411abe2e741c5b6073f9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T23:36:56Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-58c78e931a9b411abe2e741c5b6073f92023-11-23T16:58:23ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832022-09-011118529910.3390/jcm11185299Comparison of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Devices in Aortic Stenosis: A Network Meta-Analysis of 42,105 PatientsAla Abu Dogosh0Ahlam Adawi1Aref El Nasasra2Carlos Cafri3Orit Barrett4Gal Tsaban5Rami Barashi6Edward Koifman7Soroka Medical Center, Heart Institute, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84101, IsraelSoroka Medical Center, Heart Institute, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84101, IsraelSoroka Medical Center, Heart Institute, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84101, IsraelSoroka Medical Center, Heart Institute, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84101, IsraelSoroka Medical Center, Heart Institute, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84101, IsraelSoroka Medical Center, Heart Institute, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84101, IsraelMeir Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6423906, IsraelMeir Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6423906, Israel<i>Background:</i> In recent years, trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as an excellent alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Currently, there are several approved devices on the market, yet comparisons among them are scarce. We aimed to compare the various devices via a network meta-analysis. <i>Methods:</i> We performed a network meta-analysis including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity-matched studies that provide comparisons of either a single TAVI with SAVR or two different TAVI devices and report clinical outcomes. <i>Results:</i> We included 12 RCT and 13 propensity-matched studies comprising 42,105 patients, among whom 27,134 underwent TAVI using various valve systems (Sapien & Sapien XT, Sapien 3, Corvalve, Evolut & Evolut Pro, Acurate Neo, Portico). The mean follow-up time was 23.4 months. Sapien 3 was superior over SAVR in the reduction of all-cause mortality (OR = 0.53; 95%CrI 0.31–0.91), while no significant difference existed between other devices and SAVR. Aortic regurgitation was more frequent among TAVI devices compared to SAVR. There was no significant difference between the various THVs and SAVR in cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, NYHA class III-IV, and endocarditis. <i>Conclusions:</i> Newer generation TAVI devices, especially Sapien 3 and Evolut R/Pro are associated with improved outcomes compared to SAVR and other devices of the older generation.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/18/5299aortic valve diseaseTAVIall-cause mortality
spellingShingle Ala Abu Dogosh
Ahlam Adawi
Aref El Nasasra
Carlos Cafri
Orit Barrett
Gal Tsaban
Rami Barashi
Edward Koifman
Comparison of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Devices in Aortic Stenosis: A Network Meta-Analysis of 42,105 Patients
Journal of Clinical Medicine
aortic valve disease
TAVI
all-cause mortality
title Comparison of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Devices in Aortic Stenosis: A Network Meta-Analysis of 42,105 Patients
title_full Comparison of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Devices in Aortic Stenosis: A Network Meta-Analysis of 42,105 Patients
title_fullStr Comparison of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Devices in Aortic Stenosis: A Network Meta-Analysis of 42,105 Patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Devices in Aortic Stenosis: A Network Meta-Analysis of 42,105 Patients
title_short Comparison of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Devices in Aortic Stenosis: A Network Meta-Analysis of 42,105 Patients
title_sort comparison of transcatheter aortic valve implantation devices in aortic stenosis a network meta analysis of 42 105 patients
topic aortic valve disease
TAVI
all-cause mortality
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/18/5299
work_keys_str_mv AT alaabudogosh comparisonoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationdevicesinaorticstenosisanetworkmetaanalysisof42105patients
AT ahlamadawi comparisonoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationdevicesinaorticstenosisanetworkmetaanalysisof42105patients
AT arefelnasasra comparisonoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationdevicesinaorticstenosisanetworkmetaanalysisof42105patients
AT carloscafri comparisonoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationdevicesinaorticstenosisanetworkmetaanalysisof42105patients
AT oritbarrett comparisonoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationdevicesinaorticstenosisanetworkmetaanalysisof42105patients
AT galtsaban comparisonoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationdevicesinaorticstenosisanetworkmetaanalysisof42105patients
AT ramibarashi comparisonoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationdevicesinaorticstenosisanetworkmetaanalysisof42105patients
AT edwardkoifman comparisonoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationdevicesinaorticstenosisanetworkmetaanalysisof42105patients