Treatment response in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who had inadequate response to prior secukinumab

Background/Objective: Secukinumab is an effective treatment for psoriasis, and it has been reported to be effective in patients who failed on multiple prior biologics. However, treatment failure of secukinumab is possible and the alternative management in these patients remains poorly studied. Metho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tai-Siang Chiu, Tsen-Fang Tsai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Dermatologica Sinica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.dermsinica.org/article.asp?issn=1027-8117;year=2019;volume=37;issue=3;spage=129;epage=133;aulast=Chiu
_version_ 1818353198732148736
author Tai-Siang Chiu
Tsen-Fang Tsai
author_facet Tai-Siang Chiu
Tsen-Fang Tsai
author_sort Tai-Siang Chiu
collection DOAJ
description Background/Objective: Secukinumab is an effective treatment for psoriasis, and it has been reported to be effective in patients who failed on multiple prior biologics. However, treatment failure of secukinumab is possible and the alternative management in these patients remains poorly studied. Methods: We reviewed the treatment efficacy of all patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who used secukinumab as monotherapy and did not reach Psoriasis Area Severity Index 75 (PASI 75) response at week 16 (primary failure) or later (secondary failure). The treatment response of these patients during subsequent treatments was recorded. Optimal PASI improvement between weeks 12 and 20 and at the end of observation period was recorded. Results: Traditional systemic treatment (n = 4), etanercept (n = 1), adalimumab (n = 6), secukinumab weekly reloading (n = 2), or ustekinumab (n = 4) was administered in 16 patients (one with both ustekinumab and adalimumab). Six patients reached PASI 75 at week 16, including three (50%) with adalimumab. PASI 75 response was maintained in four patients at the end of observation period. Two (50%) of them used adalimumab, one used methotrexate plus acitretin, and the other used secukinumab. Conclusion: Adalimumab demonstrates better response in patients with refractory psoriasis to secukinumab. Traditional systemic medication and re-loading of secukinumab can also provide some benefits.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T19:05:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-58cbf8ddfe8a448f81d3fff2f8962bcb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1027-8117
2223-330X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T19:05:43Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Dermatologica Sinica
spelling doaj.art-58cbf8ddfe8a448f81d3fff2f8962bcb2022-12-21T23:34:33ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsDermatologica Sinica1027-81172223-330X2019-01-0137312913310.4103/ds.ds_36_18Treatment response in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who had inadequate response to prior secukinumabTai-Siang ChiuTsen-Fang TsaiBackground/Objective: Secukinumab is an effective treatment for psoriasis, and it has been reported to be effective in patients who failed on multiple prior biologics. However, treatment failure of secukinumab is possible and the alternative management in these patients remains poorly studied. Methods: We reviewed the treatment efficacy of all patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who used secukinumab as monotherapy and did not reach Psoriasis Area Severity Index 75 (PASI 75) response at week 16 (primary failure) or later (secondary failure). The treatment response of these patients during subsequent treatments was recorded. Optimal PASI improvement between weeks 12 and 20 and at the end of observation period was recorded. Results: Traditional systemic treatment (n = 4), etanercept (n = 1), adalimumab (n = 6), secukinumab weekly reloading (n = 2), or ustekinumab (n = 4) was administered in 16 patients (one with both ustekinumab and adalimumab). Six patients reached PASI 75 at week 16, including three (50%) with adalimumab. PASI 75 response was maintained in four patients at the end of observation period. Two (50%) of them used adalimumab, one used methotrexate plus acitretin, and the other used secukinumab. Conclusion: Adalimumab demonstrates better response in patients with refractory psoriasis to secukinumab. Traditional systemic medication and re-loading of secukinumab can also provide some benefits.http://www.dermsinica.org/article.asp?issn=1027-8117;year=2019;volume=37;issue=3;spage=129;epage=133;aulast=ChiuAdalimumabpsoriasissecukinumab
spellingShingle Tai-Siang Chiu
Tsen-Fang Tsai
Treatment response in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who had inadequate response to prior secukinumab
Dermatologica Sinica
Adalimumab
psoriasis
secukinumab
title Treatment response in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who had inadequate response to prior secukinumab
title_full Treatment response in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who had inadequate response to prior secukinumab
title_fullStr Treatment response in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who had inadequate response to prior secukinumab
title_full_unstemmed Treatment response in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who had inadequate response to prior secukinumab
title_short Treatment response in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who had inadequate response to prior secukinumab
title_sort treatment response in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis who had inadequate response to prior secukinumab
topic Adalimumab
psoriasis
secukinumab
url http://www.dermsinica.org/article.asp?issn=1027-8117;year=2019;volume=37;issue=3;spage=129;epage=133;aulast=Chiu
work_keys_str_mv AT taisiangchiu treatmentresponseinpatientswithmoderatetoseverepsoriasiswhohadinadequateresponsetopriorsecukinumab
AT tsenfangtsai treatmentresponseinpatientswithmoderatetoseverepsoriasiswhohadinadequateresponsetopriorsecukinumab