Functional outcomes after resections for low rectal tumors: comparison of Transanal with laparoscopic Total Mesorectal excision

Abstract Background Aim of this study was to evaluate functional outcomes of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) in comparison to conventional laparoscopic approach (LaTME) in terms of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Methods Forty-six patients who underwent total mesorectal excision...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mateusz Rubinkiewicz, Piotr Zarzycki, Jan Witowski, Magdalena Pisarska, Natalia Gajewska, Grzegorz Torbicz, Michał Nowakowski, Piotr Major, Andrzej Budzyński, Michał Pędziwiatr
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-07-01
Series:BMC Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12893-019-0550-4
_version_ 1818521690785710080
author Mateusz Rubinkiewicz
Piotr Zarzycki
Jan Witowski
Magdalena Pisarska
Natalia Gajewska
Grzegorz Torbicz
Michał Nowakowski
Piotr Major
Andrzej Budzyński
Michał Pędziwiatr
author_facet Mateusz Rubinkiewicz
Piotr Zarzycki
Jan Witowski
Magdalena Pisarska
Natalia Gajewska
Grzegorz Torbicz
Michał Nowakowski
Piotr Major
Andrzej Budzyński
Michał Pędziwiatr
author_sort Mateusz Rubinkiewicz
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Aim of this study was to evaluate functional outcomes of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) in comparison to conventional laparoscopic approach (LaTME) in terms of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Methods Forty-six patients who underwent total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer between 2013 and 2017 were enrolled. Primary outcome was the severity of faecal incontinence, assessed both before the treatment and 6 months after ileostomy reversal. LARS score and Jorge-Wexner scale were utilized to analyze its severity. Results Twenty (87%) from TaTME and 21 (91%) from LaTME group developed LARS postoperatively. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of LARS occurrence (p = 0.63) and severity. The median Wexner score was comparable in both groups (8 [IQR: 4–12] vs 7 [3–11], p = 0.83). Univariate analysis revealed that postoperative complications were a risk factor for LARS development (p = 0.02). Perioperative outcomes, including operative time, blood loss and intraoperative adverse events did not differ significantly between groups either. Five TaTME patients developed postoperative complications, while there were morbidity 6 cases in LaTME group. Quality of mesorectal excision was comparable with 20 and 19 complete cases in TaTME and LaTME groups, respectively. Conclusions TaTME provided comparable outcomes in terms of functional outcomes in comparison to LaTME for total mesorectal excision in low rectal cancers. Having said that, LARS prevalence is still high and requires further evaluation of the technique.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T01:54:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-58d276c1df6a4a939a7283768200457e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2482
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T01:54:47Z
publishDate 2019-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Surgery
spelling doaj.art-58d276c1df6a4a939a7283768200457e2022-12-22T01:24:39ZengBMCBMC Surgery1471-24822019-07-011911610.1186/s12893-019-0550-4Functional outcomes after resections for low rectal tumors: comparison of Transanal with laparoscopic Total Mesorectal excisionMateusz Rubinkiewicz0Piotr Zarzycki1Jan Witowski2Magdalena Pisarska3Natalia Gajewska4Grzegorz Torbicz5Michał Nowakowski6Piotr Major7Andrzej Budzyński8Michał Pędziwiatr92nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical CollegeAbstract Background Aim of this study was to evaluate functional outcomes of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) in comparison to conventional laparoscopic approach (LaTME) in terms of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Methods Forty-six patients who underwent total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer between 2013 and 2017 were enrolled. Primary outcome was the severity of faecal incontinence, assessed both before the treatment and 6 months after ileostomy reversal. LARS score and Jorge-Wexner scale were utilized to analyze its severity. Results Twenty (87%) from TaTME and 21 (91%) from LaTME group developed LARS postoperatively. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of LARS occurrence (p = 0.63) and severity. The median Wexner score was comparable in both groups (8 [IQR: 4–12] vs 7 [3–11], p = 0.83). Univariate analysis revealed that postoperative complications were a risk factor for LARS development (p = 0.02). Perioperative outcomes, including operative time, blood loss and intraoperative adverse events did not differ significantly between groups either. Five TaTME patients developed postoperative complications, while there were morbidity 6 cases in LaTME group. Quality of mesorectal excision was comparable with 20 and 19 complete cases in TaTME and LaTME groups, respectively. Conclusions TaTME provided comparable outcomes in terms of functional outcomes in comparison to LaTME for total mesorectal excision in low rectal cancers. Having said that, LARS prevalence is still high and requires further evaluation of the technique.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12893-019-0550-4Functional outcomesFaecal incontinenceTransanal approachLow anterior resection syndromeTotal mesorectal excision
spellingShingle Mateusz Rubinkiewicz
Piotr Zarzycki
Jan Witowski
Magdalena Pisarska
Natalia Gajewska
Grzegorz Torbicz
Michał Nowakowski
Piotr Major
Andrzej Budzyński
Michał Pędziwiatr
Functional outcomes after resections for low rectal tumors: comparison of Transanal with laparoscopic Total Mesorectal excision
BMC Surgery
Functional outcomes
Faecal incontinence
Transanal approach
Low anterior resection syndrome
Total mesorectal excision
title Functional outcomes after resections for low rectal tumors: comparison of Transanal with laparoscopic Total Mesorectal excision
title_full Functional outcomes after resections for low rectal tumors: comparison of Transanal with laparoscopic Total Mesorectal excision
title_fullStr Functional outcomes after resections for low rectal tumors: comparison of Transanal with laparoscopic Total Mesorectal excision
title_full_unstemmed Functional outcomes after resections for low rectal tumors: comparison of Transanal with laparoscopic Total Mesorectal excision
title_short Functional outcomes after resections for low rectal tumors: comparison of Transanal with laparoscopic Total Mesorectal excision
title_sort functional outcomes after resections for low rectal tumors comparison of transanal with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision
topic Functional outcomes
Faecal incontinence
Transanal approach
Low anterior resection syndrome
Total mesorectal excision
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12893-019-0550-4
work_keys_str_mv AT mateuszrubinkiewicz functionaloutcomesafterresectionsforlowrectaltumorscomparisonoftransanalwithlaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcision
AT piotrzarzycki functionaloutcomesafterresectionsforlowrectaltumorscomparisonoftransanalwithlaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcision
AT janwitowski functionaloutcomesafterresectionsforlowrectaltumorscomparisonoftransanalwithlaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcision
AT magdalenapisarska functionaloutcomesafterresectionsforlowrectaltumorscomparisonoftransanalwithlaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcision
AT nataliagajewska functionaloutcomesafterresectionsforlowrectaltumorscomparisonoftransanalwithlaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcision
AT grzegorztorbicz functionaloutcomesafterresectionsforlowrectaltumorscomparisonoftransanalwithlaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcision
AT michałnowakowski functionaloutcomesafterresectionsforlowrectaltumorscomparisonoftransanalwithlaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcision
AT piotrmajor functionaloutcomesafterresectionsforlowrectaltumorscomparisonoftransanalwithlaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcision
AT andrzejbudzynski functionaloutcomesafterresectionsforlowrectaltumorscomparisonoftransanalwithlaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcision
AT michałpedziwiatr functionaloutcomesafterresectionsforlowrectaltumorscomparisonoftransanalwithlaparoscopictotalmesorectalexcision