Validation of Analytical Procedures: Graphic and Calculated Criteria for Assessment of Methods Linearity in Practice

Introduction. «Linearity» is one of the required characteristics when validating analytical procedures. The issues of the validation of linearity procedures are still relevant.Aim. To consider the main graphical and calculated criteria for confirmation of the linearity of analytical procedures and t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: N. A. Epshtein
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: LLC Center of Pharmaceutical Analytics (LLC «CPHA») 2019-05-01
Series:Разработка и регистрация лекарственных средств
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.pharmjournal.ru/jour/article/view/692
_version_ 1797874957900840960
author N. A. Epshtein
author_facet N. A. Epshtein
author_sort N. A. Epshtein
collection DOAJ
description Introduction. «Linearity» is one of the required characteristics when validating analytical procedures. The issues of the validation of linearity procedures are still relevant.Aim. To consider the main graphical and calculated criteria for confirmation of the linearity of analytical procedures and their restrictions, as well as to give recommendations.Materials and methods. Statistical calculations were performed using MS Excel. Experimental data were obtained by HPLC.Results and discussion. The main criteria for proving/confirming the linearity of analytical procedures and their restrictions are considered in detail. It is shown that these criteria cannot always give a reliable assessment of the linearity of the procedure, the possible reasons for this are indicated and recommendations are given.Conclusion. When validating the procedures, it is necessary to prove/confirm their linearity by using two, and, more reliably, three criteria, one of which must be the linearity of the plot of measured response (Y) vs concentration of the tested substance (C). On the other hand, we demonstrate here that a formal approach should not be used for the estimation of non-linearity of the procedure when using graphical and calculation criteria based on mathematical statistics, since they do not take into account the possibility of practical insignificance of small deviations from the linear dependence of Y on C.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T01:40:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-58d330074dbe4b709445fbd60de0b25a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2305-2066
2658-5049
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-04-10T01:40:12Z
publishDate 2019-05-01
publisher LLC Center of Pharmaceutical Analytics (LLC «CPHA»)
record_format Article
series Разработка и регистрация лекарственных средств
spelling doaj.art-58d330074dbe4b709445fbd60de0b25a2023-03-13T09:14:00ZrusLLC Center of Pharmaceutical Analytics (LLC «CPHA»)Разработка и регистрация лекарственных средств2305-20662658-50492019-05-018212213010.33380/2305-2066-2019-8-2-122-130678Validation of Analytical Procedures: Graphic and Calculated Criteria for Assessment of Methods Linearity in PracticeN. A. Epshtein0Центр регистрации и разработки лекарственных средств ООО «ИРВИН 2»Introduction. «Linearity» is one of the required characteristics when validating analytical procedures. The issues of the validation of linearity procedures are still relevant.Aim. To consider the main graphical and calculated criteria for confirmation of the linearity of analytical procedures and their restrictions, as well as to give recommendations.Materials and methods. Statistical calculations were performed using MS Excel. Experimental data were obtained by HPLC.Results and discussion. The main criteria for proving/confirming the linearity of analytical procedures and their restrictions are considered in detail. It is shown that these criteria cannot always give a reliable assessment of the linearity of the procedure, the possible reasons for this are indicated and recommendations are given.Conclusion. When validating the procedures, it is necessary to prove/confirm their linearity by using two, and, more reliably, three criteria, one of which must be the linearity of the plot of measured response (Y) vs concentration of the tested substance (C). On the other hand, we demonstrate here that a formal approach should not be used for the estimation of non-linearity of the procedure when using graphical and calculation criteria based on mathematical statistics, since they do not take into account the possibility of practical insignificance of small deviations from the linear dependence of Y on C.https://www.pharmjournal.ru/jour/article/view/692валидациялинейностьметодикикритерии приемлемости
spellingShingle N. A. Epshtein
Validation of Analytical Procedures: Graphic and Calculated Criteria for Assessment of Methods Linearity in Practice
Разработка и регистрация лекарственных средств
валидация
линейность
методики
критерии приемлемости
title Validation of Analytical Procedures: Graphic and Calculated Criteria for Assessment of Methods Linearity in Practice
title_full Validation of Analytical Procedures: Graphic and Calculated Criteria for Assessment of Methods Linearity in Practice
title_fullStr Validation of Analytical Procedures: Graphic and Calculated Criteria for Assessment of Methods Linearity in Practice
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Analytical Procedures: Graphic and Calculated Criteria for Assessment of Methods Linearity in Practice
title_short Validation of Analytical Procedures: Graphic and Calculated Criteria for Assessment of Methods Linearity in Practice
title_sort validation of analytical procedures graphic and calculated criteria for assessment of methods linearity in practice
topic валидация
линейность
методики
критерии приемлемости
url https://www.pharmjournal.ru/jour/article/view/692
work_keys_str_mv AT naepshtein validationofanalyticalproceduresgraphicandcalculatedcriteriaforassessmentofmethodslinearityinpractice