Individualized Contrast Media Application Based on Body Weight and Contrast Enhancement in Computed Tomography of Livers without Steatosis
This study analyzes the homogeneity in liver attenuation of a body-weight-based protocol compared to a semi-fixed protocol. Patients undergoing abdominal multiphase computed tomography received 0.500 g of iodine (gI) per kilogram of body weight. Liver attenuation and enhancement were determined usin...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-06-01
|
Series: | Diagnostics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/12/7/1551 |
_version_ | 1797440058054148096 |
---|---|
author | Daan J. de Jong Véronique V. van Cooten Wouter B. Veldhuis Pim A. de Jong Madeleine Kok |
author_facet | Daan J. de Jong Véronique V. van Cooten Wouter B. Veldhuis Pim A. de Jong Madeleine Kok |
author_sort | Daan J. de Jong |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This study analyzes the homogeneity in liver attenuation of a body-weight-based protocol compared to a semi-fixed protocol. Patients undergoing abdominal multiphase computed tomography received 0.500 g of iodine (gI) per kilogram of body weight. Liver attenuation and enhancement were determined using regions of interest on scans in the pre-contrast and portal venous phases. The outcomes were analyzed for interpatient uniformity in weight groups. The subjective image quality was scored using a four-point Likert scale (excellent, good, moderate, and nondiagnostic). A total of 80 patients were included (56.3% male, 64 years, 78.0 kg) and were compared to 80 propensity-score-matched patients (62.5% male, 63 years, 81.7 kg). The liver attenuation values for different weight groups of the TBW-based protocol were not significantly different (<i>p</i> = 0.331): 109.1 ± 13.8 HU (≤70 kg), 104.6 ± 9.70 HU (70–90 kg), and 105.1 ± 11.6 HU (≥90 kg). For the semi-fixed protocol, there was a significant difference between the weight groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001): 121.1 ± 12.1 HU (≤70 kg), 108.9 ± 11.0 HU (70–90 kg), and 105.0 ± 9.8 HU (≥90 kg). For the TBW-based protocol, the enhancement was not significantly different between the weight groups (<i>p</i> = 0.064): 46.2 ± 15.1 HU (≤70 kg), 59.3 ± 6.8 HU (70–90 kg), and 52.1 ± 11.7 HU (≥90 kg). Additionally, for the semi-fixed protocol, the enhancement was not significantly different between the weight groups (<i>p</i> = 0.069): 59.4 ± 11.0 HU (≤70 kg), 53.0 ± 10.3 HU (70–90 kg), and 52.4 ± 7.5 HU (≥90 kg). The mean administered amount of iodine per kilogram was less for the TBW-based protocol compared to the semi-fixed protocol: 0.499 ± 0.012 and 0.528 ± 0.079, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Of the TBW-based protocol, 17.5% of the scans scored excellent enhancement quality, 76.3% good, and 6.3% moderate. Of the semi-fixed protocol, 70.0% scored excellent quality, 21.3% scored good, and 8.8% scored moderate. In conclusion, the TBW-based protocol increased the interpatient uniformity of liver attenuation but not the enhancement in the portal venous phase compared to the semi-fixed protocol, using an overall lower amount of contrast media and maintaining good subjective image quality. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T12:01:37Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-58e4bd4408e34c9e8cc8faeb58667389 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2075-4418 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T12:01:37Z |
publishDate | 2022-06-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Diagnostics |
spelling | doaj.art-58e4bd4408e34c9e8cc8faeb586673892023-11-30T23:02:39ZengMDPI AGDiagnostics2075-44182022-06-01127155110.3390/diagnostics12071551Individualized Contrast Media Application Based on Body Weight and Contrast Enhancement in Computed Tomography of Livers without SteatosisDaan J. de Jong0Véronique V. van Cooten1Wouter B. Veldhuis2Pim A. de Jong3Madeleine Kok4Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The NetherlandsThis study analyzes the homogeneity in liver attenuation of a body-weight-based protocol compared to a semi-fixed protocol. Patients undergoing abdominal multiphase computed tomography received 0.500 g of iodine (gI) per kilogram of body weight. Liver attenuation and enhancement were determined using regions of interest on scans in the pre-contrast and portal venous phases. The outcomes were analyzed for interpatient uniformity in weight groups. The subjective image quality was scored using a four-point Likert scale (excellent, good, moderate, and nondiagnostic). A total of 80 patients were included (56.3% male, 64 years, 78.0 kg) and were compared to 80 propensity-score-matched patients (62.5% male, 63 years, 81.7 kg). The liver attenuation values for different weight groups of the TBW-based protocol were not significantly different (<i>p</i> = 0.331): 109.1 ± 13.8 HU (≤70 kg), 104.6 ± 9.70 HU (70–90 kg), and 105.1 ± 11.6 HU (≥90 kg). For the semi-fixed protocol, there was a significant difference between the weight groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001): 121.1 ± 12.1 HU (≤70 kg), 108.9 ± 11.0 HU (70–90 kg), and 105.0 ± 9.8 HU (≥90 kg). For the TBW-based protocol, the enhancement was not significantly different between the weight groups (<i>p</i> = 0.064): 46.2 ± 15.1 HU (≤70 kg), 59.3 ± 6.8 HU (70–90 kg), and 52.1 ± 11.7 HU (≥90 kg). Additionally, for the semi-fixed protocol, the enhancement was not significantly different between the weight groups (<i>p</i> = 0.069): 59.4 ± 11.0 HU (≤70 kg), 53.0 ± 10.3 HU (70–90 kg), and 52.4 ± 7.5 HU (≥90 kg). The mean administered amount of iodine per kilogram was less for the TBW-based protocol compared to the semi-fixed protocol: 0.499 ± 0.012 and 0.528 ± 0.079, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Of the TBW-based protocol, 17.5% of the scans scored excellent enhancement quality, 76.3% good, and 6.3% moderate. Of the semi-fixed protocol, 70.0% scored excellent quality, 21.3% scored good, and 8.8% scored moderate. In conclusion, the TBW-based protocol increased the interpatient uniformity of liver attenuation but not the enhancement in the portal venous phase compared to the semi-fixed protocol, using an overall lower amount of contrast media and maintaining good subjective image quality.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/12/7/1551computed tomographyliver attenuationcontrast mediapersonalized care |
spellingShingle | Daan J. de Jong Véronique V. van Cooten Wouter B. Veldhuis Pim A. de Jong Madeleine Kok Individualized Contrast Media Application Based on Body Weight and Contrast Enhancement in Computed Tomography of Livers without Steatosis Diagnostics computed tomography liver attenuation contrast media personalized care |
title | Individualized Contrast Media Application Based on Body Weight and Contrast Enhancement in Computed Tomography of Livers without Steatosis |
title_full | Individualized Contrast Media Application Based on Body Weight and Contrast Enhancement in Computed Tomography of Livers without Steatosis |
title_fullStr | Individualized Contrast Media Application Based on Body Weight and Contrast Enhancement in Computed Tomography of Livers without Steatosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Individualized Contrast Media Application Based on Body Weight and Contrast Enhancement in Computed Tomography of Livers without Steatosis |
title_short | Individualized Contrast Media Application Based on Body Weight and Contrast Enhancement in Computed Tomography of Livers without Steatosis |
title_sort | individualized contrast media application based on body weight and contrast enhancement in computed tomography of livers without steatosis |
topic | computed tomography liver attenuation contrast media personalized care |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/12/7/1551 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daanjdejong individualizedcontrastmediaapplicationbasedonbodyweightandcontrastenhancementincomputedtomographyofliverswithoutsteatosis AT veroniquevvancooten individualizedcontrastmediaapplicationbasedonbodyweightandcontrastenhancementincomputedtomographyofliverswithoutsteatosis AT wouterbveldhuis individualizedcontrastmediaapplicationbasedonbodyweightandcontrastenhancementincomputedtomographyofliverswithoutsteatosis AT pimadejong individualizedcontrastmediaapplicationbasedonbodyweightandcontrastenhancementincomputedtomographyofliverswithoutsteatosis AT madeleinekok individualizedcontrastmediaapplicationbasedonbodyweightandcontrastenhancementincomputedtomographyofliverswithoutsteatosis |