Individualized Contrast Media Application Based on Body Weight and Contrast Enhancement in Computed Tomography of Livers without Steatosis

This study analyzes the homogeneity in liver attenuation of a body-weight-based protocol compared to a semi-fixed protocol. Patients undergoing abdominal multiphase computed tomography received 0.500 g of iodine (gI) per kilogram of body weight. Liver attenuation and enhancement were determined usin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daan J. de Jong, Véronique V. van Cooten, Wouter B. Veldhuis, Pim A. de Jong, Madeleine Kok
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-06-01
Series:Diagnostics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/12/7/1551
_version_ 1797440058054148096
author Daan J. de Jong
Véronique V. van Cooten
Wouter B. Veldhuis
Pim A. de Jong
Madeleine Kok
author_facet Daan J. de Jong
Véronique V. van Cooten
Wouter B. Veldhuis
Pim A. de Jong
Madeleine Kok
author_sort Daan J. de Jong
collection DOAJ
description This study analyzes the homogeneity in liver attenuation of a body-weight-based protocol compared to a semi-fixed protocol. Patients undergoing abdominal multiphase computed tomography received 0.500 g of iodine (gI) per kilogram of body weight. Liver attenuation and enhancement were determined using regions of interest on scans in the pre-contrast and portal venous phases. The outcomes were analyzed for interpatient uniformity in weight groups. The subjective image quality was scored using a four-point Likert scale (excellent, good, moderate, and nondiagnostic). A total of 80 patients were included (56.3% male, 64 years, 78.0 kg) and were compared to 80 propensity-score-matched patients (62.5% male, 63 years, 81.7 kg). The liver attenuation values for different weight groups of the TBW-based protocol were not significantly different (<i>p</i> = 0.331): 109.1 ± 13.8 HU (≤70 kg), 104.6 ± 9.70 HU (70–90 kg), and 105.1 ± 11.6 HU (≥90 kg). For the semi-fixed protocol, there was a significant difference between the weight groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001): 121.1 ± 12.1 HU (≤70 kg), 108.9 ± 11.0 HU (70–90 kg), and 105.0 ± 9.8 HU (≥90 kg). For the TBW-based protocol, the enhancement was not significantly different between the weight groups (<i>p</i> = 0.064): 46.2 ± 15.1 HU (≤70 kg), 59.3 ± 6.8 HU (70–90 kg), and 52.1 ± 11.7 HU (≥90 kg). Additionally, for the semi-fixed protocol, the enhancement was not significantly different between the weight groups (<i>p</i> = 0.069): 59.4 ± 11.0 HU (≤70 kg), 53.0 ± 10.3 HU (70–90 kg), and 52.4 ± 7.5 HU (≥90 kg). The mean administered amount of iodine per kilogram was less for the TBW-based protocol compared to the semi-fixed protocol: 0.499 ± 0.012 and 0.528 ± 0.079, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Of the TBW-based protocol, 17.5% of the scans scored excellent enhancement quality, 76.3% good, and 6.3% moderate. Of the semi-fixed protocol, 70.0% scored excellent quality, 21.3% scored good, and 8.8% scored moderate. In conclusion, the TBW-based protocol increased the interpatient uniformity of liver attenuation but not the enhancement in the portal venous phase compared to the semi-fixed protocol, using an overall lower amount of contrast media and maintaining good subjective image quality.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T12:01:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-58e4bd4408e34c9e8cc8faeb58667389
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4418
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T12:01:37Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Diagnostics
spelling doaj.art-58e4bd4408e34c9e8cc8faeb586673892023-11-30T23:02:39ZengMDPI AGDiagnostics2075-44182022-06-01127155110.3390/diagnostics12071551Individualized Contrast Media Application Based on Body Weight and Contrast Enhancement in Computed Tomography of Livers without SteatosisDaan J. de Jong0Véronique V. van Cooten1Wouter B. Veldhuis2Pim A. de Jong3Madeleine Kok4Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The NetherlandsThis study analyzes the homogeneity in liver attenuation of a body-weight-based protocol compared to a semi-fixed protocol. Patients undergoing abdominal multiphase computed tomography received 0.500 g of iodine (gI) per kilogram of body weight. Liver attenuation and enhancement were determined using regions of interest on scans in the pre-contrast and portal venous phases. The outcomes were analyzed for interpatient uniformity in weight groups. The subjective image quality was scored using a four-point Likert scale (excellent, good, moderate, and nondiagnostic). A total of 80 patients were included (56.3% male, 64 years, 78.0 kg) and were compared to 80 propensity-score-matched patients (62.5% male, 63 years, 81.7 kg). The liver attenuation values for different weight groups of the TBW-based protocol were not significantly different (<i>p</i> = 0.331): 109.1 ± 13.8 HU (≤70 kg), 104.6 ± 9.70 HU (70–90 kg), and 105.1 ± 11.6 HU (≥90 kg). For the semi-fixed protocol, there was a significant difference between the weight groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001): 121.1 ± 12.1 HU (≤70 kg), 108.9 ± 11.0 HU (70–90 kg), and 105.0 ± 9.8 HU (≥90 kg). For the TBW-based protocol, the enhancement was not significantly different between the weight groups (<i>p</i> = 0.064): 46.2 ± 15.1 HU (≤70 kg), 59.3 ± 6.8 HU (70–90 kg), and 52.1 ± 11.7 HU (≥90 kg). Additionally, for the semi-fixed protocol, the enhancement was not significantly different between the weight groups (<i>p</i> = 0.069): 59.4 ± 11.0 HU (≤70 kg), 53.0 ± 10.3 HU (70–90 kg), and 52.4 ± 7.5 HU (≥90 kg). The mean administered amount of iodine per kilogram was less for the TBW-based protocol compared to the semi-fixed protocol: 0.499 ± 0.012 and 0.528 ± 0.079, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Of the TBW-based protocol, 17.5% of the scans scored excellent enhancement quality, 76.3% good, and 6.3% moderate. Of the semi-fixed protocol, 70.0% scored excellent quality, 21.3% scored good, and 8.8% scored moderate. In conclusion, the TBW-based protocol increased the interpatient uniformity of liver attenuation but not the enhancement in the portal venous phase compared to the semi-fixed protocol, using an overall lower amount of contrast media and maintaining good subjective image quality.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/12/7/1551computed tomographyliver attenuationcontrast mediapersonalized care
spellingShingle Daan J. de Jong
Véronique V. van Cooten
Wouter B. Veldhuis
Pim A. de Jong
Madeleine Kok
Individualized Contrast Media Application Based on Body Weight and Contrast Enhancement in Computed Tomography of Livers without Steatosis
Diagnostics
computed tomography
liver attenuation
contrast media
personalized care
title Individualized Contrast Media Application Based on Body Weight and Contrast Enhancement in Computed Tomography of Livers without Steatosis
title_full Individualized Contrast Media Application Based on Body Weight and Contrast Enhancement in Computed Tomography of Livers without Steatosis
title_fullStr Individualized Contrast Media Application Based on Body Weight and Contrast Enhancement in Computed Tomography of Livers without Steatosis
title_full_unstemmed Individualized Contrast Media Application Based on Body Weight and Contrast Enhancement in Computed Tomography of Livers without Steatosis
title_short Individualized Contrast Media Application Based on Body Weight and Contrast Enhancement in Computed Tomography of Livers without Steatosis
title_sort individualized contrast media application based on body weight and contrast enhancement in computed tomography of livers without steatosis
topic computed tomography
liver attenuation
contrast media
personalized care
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/12/7/1551
work_keys_str_mv AT daanjdejong individualizedcontrastmediaapplicationbasedonbodyweightandcontrastenhancementincomputedtomographyofliverswithoutsteatosis
AT veroniquevvancooten individualizedcontrastmediaapplicationbasedonbodyweightandcontrastenhancementincomputedtomographyofliverswithoutsteatosis
AT wouterbveldhuis individualizedcontrastmediaapplicationbasedonbodyweightandcontrastenhancementincomputedtomographyofliverswithoutsteatosis
AT pimadejong individualizedcontrastmediaapplicationbasedonbodyweightandcontrastenhancementincomputedtomographyofliverswithoutsteatosis
AT madeleinekok individualizedcontrastmediaapplicationbasedonbodyweightandcontrastenhancementincomputedtomographyofliverswithoutsteatosis