Comparison between Parametric and Non-Parametric Supervised Land Cover Classifications of Sentinel-2 MSI and Landsat-8 OLI Data

The present research aims at verifying whether there are significant differences between Land Use/Land Cover (LULC) classifications performed using Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) and Sentinel-2 Multispectral Instrument (MSI) data—abbreviated as L8 and S2. To comprehend the degree of accurac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giuseppe Mancino, Antonio Falciano, Rodolfo Console, Maria Lucia Trivigno
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-01-01
Series:Geographies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7086/3/1/5
_version_ 1797611528622440448
author Giuseppe Mancino
Antonio Falciano
Rodolfo Console
Maria Lucia Trivigno
author_facet Giuseppe Mancino
Antonio Falciano
Rodolfo Console
Maria Lucia Trivigno
author_sort Giuseppe Mancino
collection DOAJ
description The present research aims at verifying whether there are significant differences between Land Use/Land Cover (LULC) classifications performed using Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) and Sentinel-2 Multispectral Instrument (MSI) data—abbreviated as L8 and S2. To comprehend the degree of accuracy between these classifications, both L8 and S2 scenes covering the study area located in the Basilicata region (Italy) and acquired within a couple of days in August 2017 were considered. Both images were geometrically and atmospherically corrected and then resampled at 30 m. To identify the ground truth for training and validation, a LULC map and a forest map realized by the Basilicata region were used as references. Then, each point was verified through photo-interpretation using the orthophoto AGEA 2017 (spatial resolution of 20 cm) as a ground truth image and, only in doubtful cases, a direct GPS field survey. MLC and SVM supervised classifications were applied to both types of images and an error matrix was computed using the same reference points (ground truth) to evaluate the classification accuracy of different LULC classes. The contribution of S2′s red-edge bands in improving classifications was also verified. Definitively, ML classifications show better performance than SVM, and Landsat data provide higher accuracy than Sentinel-2.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T06:29:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-58f1b74f759549c7973038b0e5882dcd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-7086
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T06:29:01Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Geographies
spelling doaj.art-58f1b74f759549c7973038b0e5882dcd2023-11-17T11:19:18ZengMDPI AGGeographies2673-70862023-01-01318210910.3390/geographies3010005Comparison between Parametric and Non-Parametric Supervised Land Cover Classifications of Sentinel-2 MSI and Landsat-8 OLI DataGiuseppe Mancino0Antonio Falciano1Rodolfo Console2Maria Lucia Trivigno3Centro di Geomorfologia Integrata per l’Area del Mediterraneo (CGIAM), Via F. Baracca 175, 85100 Potenza, ItalyCentro di Geomorfologia Integrata per l’Area del Mediterraneo (CGIAM), Via F. Baracca 175, 85100 Potenza, ItalyCentro di Geomorfologia Integrata per l’Area del Mediterraneo (CGIAM), Via F. Baracca 175, 85100 Potenza, ItalyCentro di Geomorfologia Integrata per l’Area del Mediterraneo (CGIAM), Via F. Baracca 175, 85100 Potenza, ItalyThe present research aims at verifying whether there are significant differences between Land Use/Land Cover (LULC) classifications performed using Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) and Sentinel-2 Multispectral Instrument (MSI) data—abbreviated as L8 and S2. To comprehend the degree of accuracy between these classifications, both L8 and S2 scenes covering the study area located in the Basilicata region (Italy) and acquired within a couple of days in August 2017 were considered. Both images were geometrically and atmospherically corrected and then resampled at 30 m. To identify the ground truth for training and validation, a LULC map and a forest map realized by the Basilicata region were used as references. Then, each point was verified through photo-interpretation using the orthophoto AGEA 2017 (spatial resolution of 20 cm) as a ground truth image and, only in doubtful cases, a direct GPS field survey. MLC and SVM supervised classifications were applied to both types of images and an error matrix was computed using the same reference points (ground truth) to evaluate the classification accuracy of different LULC classes. The contribution of S2′s red-edge bands in improving classifications was also verified. Definitively, ML classifications show better performance than SVM, and Landsat data provide higher accuracy than Sentinel-2.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7086/3/1/5Landsat 8 OLISentinel-2mappingLand Use/Land Cover classificationMaximum Likelihood ClassificationSupport Vector Machine
spellingShingle Giuseppe Mancino
Antonio Falciano
Rodolfo Console
Maria Lucia Trivigno
Comparison between Parametric and Non-Parametric Supervised Land Cover Classifications of Sentinel-2 MSI and Landsat-8 OLI Data
Geographies
Landsat 8 OLI
Sentinel-2
mapping
Land Use/Land Cover classification
Maximum Likelihood Classification
Support Vector Machine
title Comparison between Parametric and Non-Parametric Supervised Land Cover Classifications of Sentinel-2 MSI and Landsat-8 OLI Data
title_full Comparison between Parametric and Non-Parametric Supervised Land Cover Classifications of Sentinel-2 MSI and Landsat-8 OLI Data
title_fullStr Comparison between Parametric and Non-Parametric Supervised Land Cover Classifications of Sentinel-2 MSI and Landsat-8 OLI Data
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Parametric and Non-Parametric Supervised Land Cover Classifications of Sentinel-2 MSI and Landsat-8 OLI Data
title_short Comparison between Parametric and Non-Parametric Supervised Land Cover Classifications of Sentinel-2 MSI and Landsat-8 OLI Data
title_sort comparison between parametric and non parametric supervised land cover classifications of sentinel 2 msi and landsat 8 oli data
topic Landsat 8 OLI
Sentinel-2
mapping
Land Use/Land Cover classification
Maximum Likelihood Classification
Support Vector Machine
url https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7086/3/1/5
work_keys_str_mv AT giuseppemancino comparisonbetweenparametricandnonparametricsupervisedlandcoverclassificationsofsentinel2msiandlandsat8olidata
AT antoniofalciano comparisonbetweenparametricandnonparametricsupervisedlandcoverclassificationsofsentinel2msiandlandsat8olidata
AT rodolfoconsole comparisonbetweenparametricandnonparametricsupervisedlandcoverclassificationsofsentinel2msiandlandsat8olidata
AT marialuciatrivigno comparisonbetweenparametricandnonparametricsupervisedlandcoverclassificationsofsentinel2msiandlandsat8olidata