Preoperative planning with three-dimensional CT vs. three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging does not change surgical management for shoulder instability

Background: This study aims to determine the effect of time and imaging modality (three-dimensional (3D) CT vs. 3D magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) on the surgical procedure indicated for shoulder instability. The hypothesis is there will be no clinical difference in procedure selection between tim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexandra V. Paul, MD, Imoh Udoh, BS, Ananyaa Bharadwaj, BS, Steven Bokshan, MD, Brett D. Owens, MD, William N. Levine, MD, Grant E. Garrigues, MD, Jeffrey S. Abrams, MD, Patrick J. McMahon, MD, Anthony Miniaci, MD, Sameer Nagda, MD, Jonathan P. Braman, MD, Peter MacDonald, MD, Jonathan C. Riboh, MD, Scott Kaar, MD, Brian Lau, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-03-01
Series:JSES International
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638323002190
_version_ 1797296205226573824
author Alexandra V. Paul, MD
Imoh Udoh, BS
Ananyaa Bharadwaj, BS
Steven Bokshan, MD
Brett D. Owens, MD
William N. Levine, MD
Grant E. Garrigues, MD
Jeffrey S. Abrams, MD
Patrick J. McMahon, MD
Anthony Miniaci, MD
Sameer Nagda, MD
Jonathan P. Braman, MD
Peter MacDonald, MD
Jonathan C. Riboh, MD
Scott Kaar, MD
Brian Lau, MD
author_facet Alexandra V. Paul, MD
Imoh Udoh, BS
Ananyaa Bharadwaj, BS
Steven Bokshan, MD
Brett D. Owens, MD
William N. Levine, MD
Grant E. Garrigues, MD
Jeffrey S. Abrams, MD
Patrick J. McMahon, MD
Anthony Miniaci, MD
Sameer Nagda, MD
Jonathan P. Braman, MD
Peter MacDonald, MD
Jonathan C. Riboh, MD
Scott Kaar, MD
Brian Lau, MD
author_sort Alexandra V. Paul, MD
collection DOAJ
description Background: This study aims to determine the effect of time and imaging modality (three-dimensional (3D) CT vs. 3D magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) on the surgical procedure indicated for shoulder instability. The hypothesis is there will be no clinical difference in procedure selection between time and imaging modality. Methods: Eleven shoulder surgeons were surveyed with the same ten shoulder instability clinical scenarios at three time points. All time points included history of present illness, musculoskeletal exam, radiographs, and standard two-dimensional MRI. To assess the effect of imaging modality, survey 1 included 3D MRI while survey 2 included a two-dimensional and 3D CT scan. To assess the effect of time, a retest was performed with survey 3 which was identical to survey 2. The outcome measured was whether surgeons made a “major” or “minor” surgical change between surveys. Results: The average major change rate was 14.1% (standard deviation: 7.6%). The average minor change rate was 12.6% (standard deviation: 7.5%). Between survey 1 to the survey 2, the major change rate was 15.2%, compared to 13.1% when going from the second to the third survey (P = .68). The minior change rate between the first and second surveys was 12.1% and between the second to third interview was 13.1% (P = .8). Discussion: The findings suggest that the major factor related to procedural changes was time between reviewing patient information. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that there remains significant intrasurgeon variability in selecting surgical procedures for shoulder instability. Lastly, the findings in this study suggest that 3D MRI is clinically equivalent to 3D CT in guiding shoulder instability surgical management. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that there is significant variability in surgical procedure selection driven by time alone in shoulder instability. Surgical decision making with 3D MRI was similar to 3D CT scans and may be used by surgeons for preoperative planning.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T22:00:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-58f57d347bcb4c93a7cb9ba4f0c989c5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-6383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T22:00:00Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series JSES International
spelling doaj.art-58f57d347bcb4c93a7cb9ba4f0c989c52024-02-24T04:55:35ZengElsevierJSES International2666-63832024-03-0182243249Preoperative planning with three-dimensional CT vs. three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging does not change surgical management for shoulder instabilityAlexandra V. Paul, MD0Imoh Udoh, BS1Ananyaa Bharadwaj, BS2Steven Bokshan, MD3Brett D. Owens, MD4William N. Levine, MD5Grant E. Garrigues, MD6Jeffrey S. Abrams, MD7Patrick J. McMahon, MD8Anthony Miniaci, MD9Sameer Nagda, MD10Jonathan P. Braman, MD11Peter MacDonald, MD12Jonathan C. Riboh, MD13Scott Kaar, MD14Brian Lau, MD15Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Corresponding author: Alexandra V. Paul, MD, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box 3000, Durham, NC 27710, USA.Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USADepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USADepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USAMidwest Orthopaedics at RUSH, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USAUniversity Medical Center at Princeton, Princeton, NJ, USAUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USAAnderson Orthopaedic Clinic, Arlington, VA, USADepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USAOrthopaedic Surgery, Pan Am Clinic, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, CanadaAtrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC, USADepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USADepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USABackground: This study aims to determine the effect of time and imaging modality (three-dimensional (3D) CT vs. 3D magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) on the surgical procedure indicated for shoulder instability. The hypothesis is there will be no clinical difference in procedure selection between time and imaging modality. Methods: Eleven shoulder surgeons were surveyed with the same ten shoulder instability clinical scenarios at three time points. All time points included history of present illness, musculoskeletal exam, radiographs, and standard two-dimensional MRI. To assess the effect of imaging modality, survey 1 included 3D MRI while survey 2 included a two-dimensional and 3D CT scan. To assess the effect of time, a retest was performed with survey 3 which was identical to survey 2. The outcome measured was whether surgeons made a “major” or “minor” surgical change between surveys. Results: The average major change rate was 14.1% (standard deviation: 7.6%). The average minor change rate was 12.6% (standard deviation: 7.5%). Between survey 1 to the survey 2, the major change rate was 15.2%, compared to 13.1% when going from the second to the third survey (P = .68). The minior change rate between the first and second surveys was 12.1% and between the second to third interview was 13.1% (P = .8). Discussion: The findings suggest that the major factor related to procedural changes was time between reviewing patient information. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that there remains significant intrasurgeon variability in selecting surgical procedures for shoulder instability. Lastly, the findings in this study suggest that 3D MRI is clinically equivalent to 3D CT in guiding shoulder instability surgical management. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that there is significant variability in surgical procedure selection driven by time alone in shoulder instability. Surgical decision making with 3D MRI was similar to 3D CT scans and may be used by surgeons for preoperative planning.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638323002190Shoulder instabilitySports medicineOrthopedic surgeryShoulder surgeryShoulder dislocationArthroscopy
spellingShingle Alexandra V. Paul, MD
Imoh Udoh, BS
Ananyaa Bharadwaj, BS
Steven Bokshan, MD
Brett D. Owens, MD
William N. Levine, MD
Grant E. Garrigues, MD
Jeffrey S. Abrams, MD
Patrick J. McMahon, MD
Anthony Miniaci, MD
Sameer Nagda, MD
Jonathan P. Braman, MD
Peter MacDonald, MD
Jonathan C. Riboh, MD
Scott Kaar, MD
Brian Lau, MD
Preoperative planning with three-dimensional CT vs. three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging does not change surgical management for shoulder instability
JSES International
Shoulder instability
Sports medicine
Orthopedic surgery
Shoulder surgery
Shoulder dislocation
Arthroscopy
title Preoperative planning with three-dimensional CT vs. three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging does not change surgical management for shoulder instability
title_full Preoperative planning with three-dimensional CT vs. three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging does not change surgical management for shoulder instability
title_fullStr Preoperative planning with three-dimensional CT vs. three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging does not change surgical management for shoulder instability
title_full_unstemmed Preoperative planning with three-dimensional CT vs. three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging does not change surgical management for shoulder instability
title_short Preoperative planning with three-dimensional CT vs. three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging does not change surgical management for shoulder instability
title_sort preoperative planning with three dimensional ct vs three dimensional magnetic resonance imaging does not change surgical management for shoulder instability
topic Shoulder instability
Sports medicine
Orthopedic surgery
Shoulder surgery
Shoulder dislocation
Arthroscopy
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638323002190
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandravpaulmd preoperativeplanningwiththreedimensionalctvsthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingdoesnotchangesurgicalmanagementforshoulderinstability
AT imohudohbs preoperativeplanningwiththreedimensionalctvsthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingdoesnotchangesurgicalmanagementforshoulderinstability
AT ananyaabharadwajbs preoperativeplanningwiththreedimensionalctvsthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingdoesnotchangesurgicalmanagementforshoulderinstability
AT stevenbokshanmd preoperativeplanningwiththreedimensionalctvsthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingdoesnotchangesurgicalmanagementforshoulderinstability
AT brettdowensmd preoperativeplanningwiththreedimensionalctvsthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingdoesnotchangesurgicalmanagementforshoulderinstability
AT williamnlevinemd preoperativeplanningwiththreedimensionalctvsthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingdoesnotchangesurgicalmanagementforshoulderinstability
AT grantegarriguesmd preoperativeplanningwiththreedimensionalctvsthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingdoesnotchangesurgicalmanagementforshoulderinstability
AT jeffreysabramsmd preoperativeplanningwiththreedimensionalctvsthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingdoesnotchangesurgicalmanagementforshoulderinstability
AT patrickjmcmahonmd preoperativeplanningwiththreedimensionalctvsthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingdoesnotchangesurgicalmanagementforshoulderinstability
AT anthonyminiacimd preoperativeplanningwiththreedimensionalctvsthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingdoesnotchangesurgicalmanagementforshoulderinstability
AT sameernagdamd preoperativeplanningwiththreedimensionalctvsthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingdoesnotchangesurgicalmanagementforshoulderinstability
AT jonathanpbramanmd preoperativeplanningwiththreedimensionalctvsthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingdoesnotchangesurgicalmanagementforshoulderinstability
AT petermacdonaldmd preoperativeplanningwiththreedimensionalctvsthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingdoesnotchangesurgicalmanagementforshoulderinstability
AT jonathancribohmd preoperativeplanningwiththreedimensionalctvsthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingdoesnotchangesurgicalmanagementforshoulderinstability
AT scottkaarmd preoperativeplanningwiththreedimensionalctvsthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingdoesnotchangesurgicalmanagementforshoulderinstability
AT brianlaumd preoperativeplanningwiththreedimensionalctvsthreedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingdoesnotchangesurgicalmanagementforshoulderinstability