The Activity and Stability of p56Lck and TCR Signaling Do Not Depend on the Co-Chaperone Cdc37

Lymphocyte-specific protein tyrosine kinase (Lck) is a pivotal tyrosine kinase involved in T cell receptor (TCR) signaling. Because of its importance, the activity of Lck is regulated at different levels including phosphorylation of tyrosine residues, protein–protein interactions, and localization....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah Kowallik, Andreas Kritikos, Matthias Kästle, Christoph Thurm, Burkhart Schraven, Luca Simeoni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-12-01
Series:International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/22/1/126
_version_ 1797543562957553664
author Sarah Kowallik
Andreas Kritikos
Matthias Kästle
Christoph Thurm
Burkhart Schraven
Luca Simeoni
author_facet Sarah Kowallik
Andreas Kritikos
Matthias Kästle
Christoph Thurm
Burkhart Schraven
Luca Simeoni
author_sort Sarah Kowallik
collection DOAJ
description Lymphocyte-specific protein tyrosine kinase (Lck) is a pivotal tyrosine kinase involved in T cell receptor (TCR) signaling. Because of its importance, the activity of Lck is regulated at different levels including phosphorylation of tyrosine residues, protein–protein interactions, and localization. It has been proposed that the co-chaperone Cdc37, which assists the chaperone heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) in the folding of client proteins, is also involved in the regulation of the activity/stability of Lck. Nevertheless, the available experimental data do not clearly support this conclusion. Thus, we assessed whether or not Cdc37 regulates Lck. We performed experiments in which the expression of Cdc37 was either augmented or suppressed in Jurkat T cells. The results of our experiments indicated that neither the overexpression nor the suppression of Cdc37 affected Lck stability and activity. Moreover, TCR signaling proceeded normally in T cells in which Cdc37 expression was either augmented or suppressed. Finally, we demonstrated that also under stress conditions Cdc37 was dispensable for the regulation of Lck activity/stability. In conclusion, our data do not support the idea that Lck is a Cdc37 client.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T13:47:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-58f6ad4a64be448788a27dd9333e62df
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1661-6596
1422-0067
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T13:47:22Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series International Journal of Molecular Sciences
spelling doaj.art-58f6ad4a64be448788a27dd9333e62df2023-11-21T02:29:23ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences1661-65961422-00672020-12-0122112610.3390/ijms22010126The Activity and Stability of p56Lck and TCR Signaling Do Not Depend on the Co-Chaperone Cdc37Sarah Kowallik0Andreas Kritikos1Matthias Kästle2Christoph Thurm3Burkhart Schraven4Luca Simeoni5Institute of Molecular and Clinical Immunology, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39120 Magdeburg, GermanyInstitute of Molecular and Clinical Immunology, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39120 Magdeburg, GermanyInstitute of Molecular and Clinical Immunology, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39120 Magdeburg, GermanyInstitute of Molecular and Clinical Immunology, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39120 Magdeburg, GermanyInstitute of Molecular and Clinical Immunology, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39120 Magdeburg, GermanyInstitute of Molecular and Clinical Immunology, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39120 Magdeburg, GermanyLymphocyte-specific protein tyrosine kinase (Lck) is a pivotal tyrosine kinase involved in T cell receptor (TCR) signaling. Because of its importance, the activity of Lck is regulated at different levels including phosphorylation of tyrosine residues, protein–protein interactions, and localization. It has been proposed that the co-chaperone Cdc37, which assists the chaperone heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) in the folding of client proteins, is also involved in the regulation of the activity/stability of Lck. Nevertheless, the available experimental data do not clearly support this conclusion. Thus, we assessed whether or not Cdc37 regulates Lck. We performed experiments in which the expression of Cdc37 was either augmented or suppressed in Jurkat T cells. The results of our experiments indicated that neither the overexpression nor the suppression of Cdc37 affected Lck stability and activity. Moreover, TCR signaling proceeded normally in T cells in which Cdc37 expression was either augmented or suppressed. Finally, we demonstrated that also under stress conditions Cdc37 was dispensable for the regulation of Lck activity/stability. In conclusion, our data do not support the idea that Lck is a Cdc37 client.https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/22/1/126Cdc37co-chaperoneLcktyrosine kinaseTCR signalingheat shock protein 90 (Hsp90)
spellingShingle Sarah Kowallik
Andreas Kritikos
Matthias Kästle
Christoph Thurm
Burkhart Schraven
Luca Simeoni
The Activity and Stability of p56Lck and TCR Signaling Do Not Depend on the Co-Chaperone Cdc37
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Cdc37
co-chaperone
Lck
tyrosine kinase
TCR signaling
heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90)
title The Activity and Stability of p56Lck and TCR Signaling Do Not Depend on the Co-Chaperone Cdc37
title_full The Activity and Stability of p56Lck and TCR Signaling Do Not Depend on the Co-Chaperone Cdc37
title_fullStr The Activity and Stability of p56Lck and TCR Signaling Do Not Depend on the Co-Chaperone Cdc37
title_full_unstemmed The Activity and Stability of p56Lck and TCR Signaling Do Not Depend on the Co-Chaperone Cdc37
title_short The Activity and Stability of p56Lck and TCR Signaling Do Not Depend on the Co-Chaperone Cdc37
title_sort activity and stability of p56lck and tcr signaling do not depend on the co chaperone cdc37
topic Cdc37
co-chaperone
Lck
tyrosine kinase
TCR signaling
heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90)
url https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/22/1/126
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahkowallik theactivityandstabilityofp56lckandtcrsignalingdonotdependonthecochaperonecdc37
AT andreaskritikos theactivityandstabilityofp56lckandtcrsignalingdonotdependonthecochaperonecdc37
AT matthiaskastle theactivityandstabilityofp56lckandtcrsignalingdonotdependonthecochaperonecdc37
AT christophthurm theactivityandstabilityofp56lckandtcrsignalingdonotdependonthecochaperonecdc37
AT burkhartschraven theactivityandstabilityofp56lckandtcrsignalingdonotdependonthecochaperonecdc37
AT lucasimeoni theactivityandstabilityofp56lckandtcrsignalingdonotdependonthecochaperonecdc37
AT sarahkowallik activityandstabilityofp56lckandtcrsignalingdonotdependonthecochaperonecdc37
AT andreaskritikos activityandstabilityofp56lckandtcrsignalingdonotdependonthecochaperonecdc37
AT matthiaskastle activityandstabilityofp56lckandtcrsignalingdonotdependonthecochaperonecdc37
AT christophthurm activityandstabilityofp56lckandtcrsignalingdonotdependonthecochaperonecdc37
AT burkhartschraven activityandstabilityofp56lckandtcrsignalingdonotdependonthecochaperonecdc37
AT lucasimeoni activityandstabilityofp56lckandtcrsignalingdonotdependonthecochaperonecdc37