Comparison of Lithium-Ion Anode Materials Using an Experimentally Verified Physics-Based Electrochemical Model

Researchers are in search of parameters inside Li-ion batteries that can be utilized to control their external behavior. Physics-based electrochemical model could bridge the gap between Li+ transportation and distribution inside battery and battery performance outside. In this paper, two commerciall...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rujian Fu, Xuan Zhou, Hengbin Fan, Douglas Blaisdell, Ajay Jagadale, Xi Zhang, Rui Xiong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-12-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/12/2174
_version_ 1817989861412438016
author Rujian Fu
Xuan Zhou
Hengbin Fan
Douglas Blaisdell
Ajay Jagadale
Xi Zhang
Rui Xiong
author_facet Rujian Fu
Xuan Zhou
Hengbin Fan
Douglas Blaisdell
Ajay Jagadale
Xi Zhang
Rui Xiong
author_sort Rujian Fu
collection DOAJ
description Researchers are in search of parameters inside Li-ion batteries that can be utilized to control their external behavior. Physics-based electrochemical model could bridge the gap between Li+ transportation and distribution inside battery and battery performance outside. In this paper, two commercially available Li-ion anode materials: graphite and Lithium titanate (Li4Ti5O12 or LTO) were selected and a physics-based electrochemical model was developed based on half-cell assembly and testing. It is found that LTO has a smaller diffusion coefficient (Ds) than graphite, which causes a larger overpotential, leading to a smaller capacity utilization and, correspondingly, a shorter duration of constant current charge or discharge. However, in large current applications, LTO performs better than graphite because its effective particle radius decreases with increasing current, leading to enhanced diffusion. In addition, LTO has a higher activation overpotential in its side reactions; its degradation rate is expected to be much smaller than graphite, indicating a longer life span.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T00:51:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-5900d55e5d2b4ccb88c847a044812c64
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T00:51:40Z
publishDate 2017-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-5900d55e5d2b4ccb88c847a044812c642022-12-22T02:21:46ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732017-12-011012217410.3390/en10122174en10122174Comparison of Lithium-Ion Anode Materials Using an Experimentally Verified Physics-Based Electrochemical ModelRujian Fu0Xuan Zhou1Hengbin Fan2Douglas Blaisdell3Ajay Jagadale4Xi Zhang5Rui Xiong6Independent Researcher, Novi, MI 48377, USADepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Kettering University, Flint, MI 48504, USADepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Kettering University, Flint, MI 48504, USADepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Kettering University, Flint, MI 48504, USADepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Kettering University, Flint, MI 48504, USASchool of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Rd., Shanghai 200240, ChinaNational Engineering Laboratory for Electric Vehicles and Collaborative Innovation Center of Electric Vehicles in Beijing, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, ChinaResearchers are in search of parameters inside Li-ion batteries that can be utilized to control their external behavior. Physics-based electrochemical model could bridge the gap between Li+ transportation and distribution inside battery and battery performance outside. In this paper, two commercially available Li-ion anode materials: graphite and Lithium titanate (Li4Ti5O12 or LTO) were selected and a physics-based electrochemical model was developed based on half-cell assembly and testing. It is found that LTO has a smaller diffusion coefficient (Ds) than graphite, which causes a larger overpotential, leading to a smaller capacity utilization and, correspondingly, a shorter duration of constant current charge or discharge. However, in large current applications, LTO performs better than graphite because its effective particle radius decreases with increasing current, leading to enhanced diffusion. In addition, LTO has a higher activation overpotential in its side reactions; its degradation rate is expected to be much smaller than graphite, indicating a longer life span.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/12/2174Li-ion batteryanode materialshalf-cell modeling
spellingShingle Rujian Fu
Xuan Zhou
Hengbin Fan
Douglas Blaisdell
Ajay Jagadale
Xi Zhang
Rui Xiong
Comparison of Lithium-Ion Anode Materials Using an Experimentally Verified Physics-Based Electrochemical Model
Energies
Li-ion battery
anode materials
half-cell modeling
title Comparison of Lithium-Ion Anode Materials Using an Experimentally Verified Physics-Based Electrochemical Model
title_full Comparison of Lithium-Ion Anode Materials Using an Experimentally Verified Physics-Based Electrochemical Model
title_fullStr Comparison of Lithium-Ion Anode Materials Using an Experimentally Verified Physics-Based Electrochemical Model
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Lithium-Ion Anode Materials Using an Experimentally Verified Physics-Based Electrochemical Model
title_short Comparison of Lithium-Ion Anode Materials Using an Experimentally Verified Physics-Based Electrochemical Model
title_sort comparison of lithium ion anode materials using an experimentally verified physics based electrochemical model
topic Li-ion battery
anode materials
half-cell modeling
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/12/2174
work_keys_str_mv AT rujianfu comparisonoflithiumionanodematerialsusinganexperimentallyverifiedphysicsbasedelectrochemicalmodel
AT xuanzhou comparisonoflithiumionanodematerialsusinganexperimentallyverifiedphysicsbasedelectrochemicalmodel
AT hengbinfan comparisonoflithiumionanodematerialsusinganexperimentallyverifiedphysicsbasedelectrochemicalmodel
AT douglasblaisdell comparisonoflithiumionanodematerialsusinganexperimentallyverifiedphysicsbasedelectrochemicalmodel
AT ajayjagadale comparisonoflithiumionanodematerialsusinganexperimentallyverifiedphysicsbasedelectrochemicalmodel
AT xizhang comparisonoflithiumionanodematerialsusinganexperimentallyverifiedphysicsbasedelectrochemicalmodel
AT ruixiong comparisonoflithiumionanodematerialsusinganexperimentallyverifiedphysicsbasedelectrochemicalmodel