Are patients improving during and after a psychiatric hospitalisation? Continuity of care outcomes of compulsory and voluntary admissions to an Italian psychiatric ward

Background: To compare the characteristics of compulsory admissions (CAs) and voluntary admissions (VAs) in a General Hospital Psychiatric Unit (GHPU), and to assess whether CA and VA patients’ outcomes improved during hospitalisation and follow-up in mental health services (MHS) based on community...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giulio Castelpietra, Silvia Guadagno, Livia Pischiutta, Davide Tossut, Elisa Maso, Umberto Albert, Matteo Balestrieri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-08-01
Series:Journal of Public Health Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jphres.org/index.php/jphres/article/view/2382
_version_ 1797968770801598464
author Giulio Castelpietra
Silvia Guadagno
Livia Pischiutta
Davide Tossut
Elisa Maso
Umberto Albert
Matteo Balestrieri
author_facet Giulio Castelpietra
Silvia Guadagno
Livia Pischiutta
Davide Tossut
Elisa Maso
Umberto Albert
Matteo Balestrieri
author_sort Giulio Castelpietra
collection DOAJ
description Background: To compare the characteristics of compulsory admissions (CAs) and voluntary admissions (VAs) in a General Hospital Psychiatric Unit (GHPU), and to assess whether CA and VA patients’ outcomes improved during hospitalisation and follow-up in mental health services (MHS) based on community continuity of care. Design and Method: Observational longitudinal study comparing 19 CAs and 83 VAs consecutively admitted to GHPU of Udine, Italy, and followed up for six months by MHS. Five psychometric scales assessed psychosocial and clinical characteristics for each patient at admission (T0), discharge (T1) and follow-up (T2). Statistical analyses were performed using: multivariate logistic regression for comparing CA and VA; Friedman χ2 and Mann-Whitney tests for outcomes’ improvement. Results: Being hospitalised for a psychotic crisis was the most significant predictor of CA (OR = 5.07). An outcomes’ improvement was observed from T0 to T1 in almost all psychometric tests, while from T1 to T2 only for PSP-A (useful social activities), CGI-S (severity of illness) and CGI-EI (drug’s efficacy related to side effects). CA was associated to lower performances in all scales at T0, in GAF and CGI-S at T1, while no difference with VA was observed at T2. Conclusion: CA and VA patients improved to a same extent during hospitalisation and follow-up, particularly in relation to social functioning. This fosters the hypothesis that community-based MHS using a longitudinal continuity of care model might achieve recovery in a long-term perspective. Future research may benefit by considering patients’ subjective experiences and assessing long-term improvement in those who received person-centred interventions.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T02:51:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-59036f2811344ac687f471dca56ee7d0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2279-9028
2279-9036
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T02:51:53Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of Public Health Research
spelling doaj.art-59036f2811344ac687f471dca56ee7d02023-01-02T16:17:31ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Public Health Research2279-90282279-90362021-08-0110.4081/jphr.2021.2382Are patients improving during and after a psychiatric hospitalisation? Continuity of care outcomes of compulsory and voluntary admissions to an Italian psychiatric wardGiulio Castelpietra0Silvia Guadagno1Livia Pischiutta2Davide Tossut3Elisa Maso4Umberto Albert5Matteo Balestrieri6Outpatient and Inpatient Care Service, Central Health Directorate, Friuli Venezia Giulia Region, TriesteUdine Nord Community Mental Health Centre, Mental Health Department, Friuli Centrale Healthcare Agency, UdineDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of TriesteWelfare Area, Giuliano Isontina Healthcare Agency, Palmanova (UD)Psychiatric Unit, Mental Health Department, Friuli Centrale Healthcare Agency, UdineDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of TriesteUnit of Psychiatry, Deaprtment of Medicine (DAME), University of UdineBackground: To compare the characteristics of compulsory admissions (CAs) and voluntary admissions (VAs) in a General Hospital Psychiatric Unit (GHPU), and to assess whether CA and VA patients’ outcomes improved during hospitalisation and follow-up in mental health services (MHS) based on community continuity of care. Design and Method: Observational longitudinal study comparing 19 CAs and 83 VAs consecutively admitted to GHPU of Udine, Italy, and followed up for six months by MHS. Five psychometric scales assessed psychosocial and clinical characteristics for each patient at admission (T0), discharge (T1) and follow-up (T2). Statistical analyses were performed using: multivariate logistic regression for comparing CA and VA; Friedman χ2 and Mann-Whitney tests for outcomes’ improvement. Results: Being hospitalised for a psychotic crisis was the most significant predictor of CA (OR = 5.07). An outcomes’ improvement was observed from T0 to T1 in almost all psychometric tests, while from T1 to T2 only for PSP-A (useful social activities), CGI-S (severity of illness) and CGI-EI (drug’s efficacy related to side effects). CA was associated to lower performances in all scales at T0, in GAF and CGI-S at T1, while no difference with VA was observed at T2. Conclusion: CA and VA patients improved to a same extent during hospitalisation and follow-up, particularly in relation to social functioning. This fosters the hypothesis that community-based MHS using a longitudinal continuity of care model might achieve recovery in a long-term perspective. Future research may benefit by considering patients’ subjective experiences and assessing long-term improvement in those who received person-centred interventions.https://www.jphres.org/index.php/jphres/article/view/2382Compulsory admissionVoluntary admissionMental health serviceOutcomeContinuity of care
spellingShingle Giulio Castelpietra
Silvia Guadagno
Livia Pischiutta
Davide Tossut
Elisa Maso
Umberto Albert
Matteo Balestrieri
Are patients improving during and after a psychiatric hospitalisation? Continuity of care outcomes of compulsory and voluntary admissions to an Italian psychiatric ward
Journal of Public Health Research
Compulsory admission
Voluntary admission
Mental health service
Outcome
Continuity of care
title Are patients improving during and after a psychiatric hospitalisation? Continuity of care outcomes of compulsory and voluntary admissions to an Italian psychiatric ward
title_full Are patients improving during and after a psychiatric hospitalisation? Continuity of care outcomes of compulsory and voluntary admissions to an Italian psychiatric ward
title_fullStr Are patients improving during and after a psychiatric hospitalisation? Continuity of care outcomes of compulsory and voluntary admissions to an Italian psychiatric ward
title_full_unstemmed Are patients improving during and after a psychiatric hospitalisation? Continuity of care outcomes of compulsory and voluntary admissions to an Italian psychiatric ward
title_short Are patients improving during and after a psychiatric hospitalisation? Continuity of care outcomes of compulsory and voluntary admissions to an Italian psychiatric ward
title_sort are patients improving during and after a psychiatric hospitalisation continuity of care outcomes of compulsory and voluntary admissions to an italian psychiatric ward
topic Compulsory admission
Voluntary admission
Mental health service
Outcome
Continuity of care
url https://www.jphres.org/index.php/jphres/article/view/2382
work_keys_str_mv AT giuliocastelpietra arepatientsimprovingduringandafterapsychiatrichospitalisationcontinuityofcareoutcomesofcompulsoryandvoluntaryadmissionstoanitalianpsychiatricward
AT silviaguadagno arepatientsimprovingduringandafterapsychiatrichospitalisationcontinuityofcareoutcomesofcompulsoryandvoluntaryadmissionstoanitalianpsychiatricward
AT liviapischiutta arepatientsimprovingduringandafterapsychiatrichospitalisationcontinuityofcareoutcomesofcompulsoryandvoluntaryadmissionstoanitalianpsychiatricward
AT davidetossut arepatientsimprovingduringandafterapsychiatrichospitalisationcontinuityofcareoutcomesofcompulsoryandvoluntaryadmissionstoanitalianpsychiatricward
AT elisamaso arepatientsimprovingduringandafterapsychiatrichospitalisationcontinuityofcareoutcomesofcompulsoryandvoluntaryadmissionstoanitalianpsychiatricward
AT umbertoalbert arepatientsimprovingduringandafterapsychiatrichospitalisationcontinuityofcareoutcomesofcompulsoryandvoluntaryadmissionstoanitalianpsychiatricward
AT matteobalestrieri arepatientsimprovingduringandafterapsychiatrichospitalisationcontinuityofcareoutcomesofcompulsoryandvoluntaryadmissionstoanitalianpsychiatricward