Deep Brain Stimulation Does Not Modulate Auditory-Motor Integration of Speech in Parkinson's Disease

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has significant effects on motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD), but existing studies on the effect of DBS on speech are rather inconclusive. It is assumed that deficits in auditory-motor integration strongly contribute to Parkinsonian speech pathology. The ai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bahne H. Bahners, Esther Florin, Julian Rohrhuber, Holger Krause, Jan Hirschmann, Ruben van de Vijver, Alfons Schnitzler, Markus Butz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Neurology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2020.00655/full
_version_ 1818061357448167424
author Bahne H. Bahners
Esther Florin
Julian Rohrhuber
Holger Krause
Jan Hirschmann
Ruben van de Vijver
Alfons Schnitzler
Alfons Schnitzler
Markus Butz
author_facet Bahne H. Bahners
Esther Florin
Julian Rohrhuber
Holger Krause
Jan Hirschmann
Ruben van de Vijver
Alfons Schnitzler
Alfons Schnitzler
Markus Butz
author_sort Bahne H. Bahners
collection DOAJ
description Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has significant effects on motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD), but existing studies on the effect of DBS on speech are rather inconclusive. It is assumed that deficits in auditory-motor integration strongly contribute to Parkinsonian speech pathology. The aim of the present study was to assess whether subthalamic DBS can modulate these deficits. Twenty PD patients (15 male, 5 female; 62.4 ± 6.7 years) with subthalamic DBS were exposed to pitch-shifted acoustic feedback during vowel vocalization and subsequent listening. Voice and brain activity were measured ON and OFF stimulation using magnetoencephalography (MEG). Vocal responses and auditory evoked responses time locked to the onset of pitch-shifted feedback were examined. A positive correlation between vocal response magnitude and pitch variability was observed for both, stimulation ON and OFF (ON: r = 0.722, p < 0.001, OFF: r = 0.746, p < 0.001). However, no differences of vocal responses to pitch-shifted feedback between the stimulation conditions were found [t(19) = −0.245, p = 0.809, d = −0.055]. P200m amplitudes of event related fields (ERF) of left and right auditory cortex (AC) and superior temporal gyrus (STG) were significantly larger during listening [left AC P200m: F(1, 19) = 10.241, p = 0.005, f = 0.734; right STG P200m: F(1, 19) = 8.393, p = 0.009, f = 0.664]. Subthalamic DBS appears to have no substantial effect on vocal compensations, although it has been suggested that auditory-motor integration deficits contribute to higher vocal response magnitudes in pitch perturbation experiments with PD patients. Thus, DBS seems to be limited in modulating auditory-motor integration of speech in PD.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T13:47:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-59086f2433fa44c0a43ed66a9c2860a3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-2295
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T13:47:02Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neurology
spelling doaj.art-59086f2433fa44c0a43ed66a9c2860a32022-12-22T01:46:21ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952020-07-011110.3389/fneur.2020.00655547739Deep Brain Stimulation Does Not Modulate Auditory-Motor Integration of Speech in Parkinson's DiseaseBahne H. Bahners0Esther Florin1Julian Rohrhuber2Holger Krause3Jan Hirschmann4Ruben van de Vijver5Alfons Schnitzler6Alfons Schnitzler7Markus Butz8Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, GermanyInstitute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, GermanyCenter for Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation, Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, GermanyInstitute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, GermanyInstitute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, GermanyInstitute of Linguistics and Information Science, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, GermanyInstitute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, GermanyDepartment of Neurology, Center for Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, GermanyInstitute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, GermanyDeep brain stimulation (DBS) has significant effects on motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD), but existing studies on the effect of DBS on speech are rather inconclusive. It is assumed that deficits in auditory-motor integration strongly contribute to Parkinsonian speech pathology. The aim of the present study was to assess whether subthalamic DBS can modulate these deficits. Twenty PD patients (15 male, 5 female; 62.4 ± 6.7 years) with subthalamic DBS were exposed to pitch-shifted acoustic feedback during vowel vocalization and subsequent listening. Voice and brain activity were measured ON and OFF stimulation using magnetoencephalography (MEG). Vocal responses and auditory evoked responses time locked to the onset of pitch-shifted feedback were examined. A positive correlation between vocal response magnitude and pitch variability was observed for both, stimulation ON and OFF (ON: r = 0.722, p < 0.001, OFF: r = 0.746, p < 0.001). However, no differences of vocal responses to pitch-shifted feedback between the stimulation conditions were found [t(19) = −0.245, p = 0.809, d = −0.055]. P200m amplitudes of event related fields (ERF) of left and right auditory cortex (AC) and superior temporal gyrus (STG) were significantly larger during listening [left AC P200m: F(1, 19) = 10.241, p = 0.005, f = 0.734; right STG P200m: F(1, 19) = 8.393, p = 0.009, f = 0.664]. Subthalamic DBS appears to have no substantial effect on vocal compensations, although it has been suggested that auditory-motor integration deficits contribute to higher vocal response magnitudes in pitch perturbation experiments with PD patients. Thus, DBS seems to be limited in modulating auditory-motor integration of speech in PD.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2020.00655/fullauditory feedbacksubthalamic nucleusauditory cortexevent related fieldsmagnetoencephalography (MEG)artifacts
spellingShingle Bahne H. Bahners
Esther Florin
Julian Rohrhuber
Holger Krause
Jan Hirschmann
Ruben van de Vijver
Alfons Schnitzler
Alfons Schnitzler
Markus Butz
Deep Brain Stimulation Does Not Modulate Auditory-Motor Integration of Speech in Parkinson's Disease
Frontiers in Neurology
auditory feedback
subthalamic nucleus
auditory cortex
event related fields
magnetoencephalography (MEG)
artifacts
title Deep Brain Stimulation Does Not Modulate Auditory-Motor Integration of Speech in Parkinson's Disease
title_full Deep Brain Stimulation Does Not Modulate Auditory-Motor Integration of Speech in Parkinson's Disease
title_fullStr Deep Brain Stimulation Does Not Modulate Auditory-Motor Integration of Speech in Parkinson's Disease
title_full_unstemmed Deep Brain Stimulation Does Not Modulate Auditory-Motor Integration of Speech in Parkinson's Disease
title_short Deep Brain Stimulation Does Not Modulate Auditory-Motor Integration of Speech in Parkinson's Disease
title_sort deep brain stimulation does not modulate auditory motor integration of speech in parkinson s disease
topic auditory feedback
subthalamic nucleus
auditory cortex
event related fields
magnetoencephalography (MEG)
artifacts
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fneur.2020.00655/full
work_keys_str_mv AT bahnehbahners deepbrainstimulationdoesnotmodulateauditorymotorintegrationofspeechinparkinsonsdisease
AT estherflorin deepbrainstimulationdoesnotmodulateauditorymotorintegrationofspeechinparkinsonsdisease
AT julianrohrhuber deepbrainstimulationdoesnotmodulateauditorymotorintegrationofspeechinparkinsonsdisease
AT holgerkrause deepbrainstimulationdoesnotmodulateauditorymotorintegrationofspeechinparkinsonsdisease
AT janhirschmann deepbrainstimulationdoesnotmodulateauditorymotorintegrationofspeechinparkinsonsdisease
AT rubenvandevijver deepbrainstimulationdoesnotmodulateauditorymotorintegrationofspeechinparkinsonsdisease
AT alfonsschnitzler deepbrainstimulationdoesnotmodulateauditorymotorintegrationofspeechinparkinsonsdisease
AT alfonsschnitzler deepbrainstimulationdoesnotmodulateauditorymotorintegrationofspeechinparkinsonsdisease
AT markusbutz deepbrainstimulationdoesnotmodulateauditorymotorintegrationofspeechinparkinsonsdisease